If anything happen, the PAP will pay themselves the CPF first, and then see how much is still leftover before distributing accordingly to your SES class. The lowest class will not see anything at all.Never depend on CPF for retirement.![]()
look, if you are anti-American, that is your business. I have been very lucky and fortunate in my life and I owe it to my country and America. I am happy with my situation. I think that is the major difference between you and I.i have never seen people type so much nonsense and stupidity and nothing relevant to the subject at all in a single post..........
email all the governments in the world and ask them to stop buying?u want other countries to stop buying ur bonds and lending u money?lol........
jealous of the current interest rates.......which is like currently less than 1% or close to zero?
u are damn right america is king at that......nvm interest rates are non existent.....the fed is busy printing like crazy......no wonder governments are dumping like crazy.....
not sure where u get that 317% number from........china debt to gdp ratio is nowhere near 300 percent.
edit: oh ok i found an article stating china's total corporate household and government debt is 300 percent of gdp......using that same retarded guage.......total USA total corporate household and government debt is 2000%........pretty damn kosher if u ask me.
it's actually a clash of civilization herelook, if you are anti-American, that is your business. I have been very lucky and fortunate in my life and I owe it to my country and America. I am happy with my situation. I think that is the major difference between you and I.
In my experience I have noticed some people whom are vehemently opposed to America - for whatever reason and in the end, after all is said and done - the root cause is always the same. People are jealous of America and everything they have achieved. So attack the king if you will because it wont change anything. They will still be there long after you and I are gone.
China is not your friend
what made you think US cannot go back on its promises ?this bond thingy is basically a. promise to pay ,an IOU by a soverign state ...it's like an IOU signed by a poor towkay living in a large mansion ..should he die ,the creditors can seize his estate in lieu of the IOU ..but what if US refuses to honour the treasury bills ?
the only presumption is that US cannot go back on its promises since a question of credibility arises as a soverign state to borrow further in future arises
but what if there is a legal loop hole ,that can set aside US legal obligation ?
helooop,that's exactly what I am saying ...read my post again pleasewhat made you think US cannot go back on its promises ?
the nation will have to start a war with US if they go back on its promises and which nation dare or have such capability ?
this bond thingy is basically a. promise to pay ,an IOU by a soverign state ...it's like an IOU signed by a poor towkay living in a large mansion ..should he die ,the creditors can seize his estate in lieu of the IOU ..but what if US refuses to honour the treasury bills ?
the only presumption is that US cannot go back on its promises since a question of credibility arises as a soverign state to borrow further in future arises
but what if there is a legal loop hole ,that can set aside US legal obligation ?
well said and well argued but whatever you thus says applies under normal circumstances ...meaning even in a normal contractual obligation the force major is a clause that nulls and void it legally ,or without losing further credibility so as to speakEven if there's a legal loophole,defaulting on ur bonds is destroying people's trust in u,and that beyond anything is the most important.
Once u lose that,u lose the ability to borrow,and our economies today are construed upon debt,mountains of it......without the ability to borrow,any civilisation is finished.even a high percent of interest is enough to destroy u.....in the history of borrowing any companies issuing bonds with high interests are often on its last legs.
well said and well argued but whatever you thus says applies under normal circumstances ...meaning even in a normal contractual obligation the force major is a clause that nulls and void it legally ,or without losing further credibility so as to speak
even where say a country falls short of its payment and the loaning country knows very well that the borrowing country is quite unable to pay ..usually the loan is written off and not pushed to pay where the question of crediblity to borrow further will arise as you argued ...simply put reset all over again
the question here whether US is unable to pay arises out of liquidity problem since a soverign guranteed is backed by the asset of the entire country....in short, should US sell say the city of New York to a willing buyer than the entire loan would be paid ...as an individual that would be the recourse but not as a soverignity
so ,it's a very touchy subject we are talking about .
is there such a guarantee?that a country's bonds is backed by the assets of the country?i think theres nothing backing it and they are free to default whenever they like no?just that in future if they wish to issue any bonds,it would be much harder to find buyers and the interest rates would be much higher.....like different sources of credit,borrowing from bank vs borrowing from loan shark....if ur credit is so bad banks refuse to deal with u.......
unless we are thinking of china's debt traps......i think those are loans made to poor countries that we know are extremely likely to default on their obligations,but there are specific clauses and obligations included that demand they
the assumption is all soverign loans as bonds carry a soverign gurantee if not what is the security for such loans ?is there such a guarantee?that a country's bonds is backed by the assets of the country?i think theres nothing backing it and they are free to default whenever they like no?just that in future if they wish to issue any bonds,it would be much harder to find buyers and the interest rates would be much higher.....like different sources of credit,borrowing from bank vs borrowing from loan shark....if ur credit is so bad banks refuse to deal with u.......
unless we are thinking of china's debt traps......i think those are loans made to poor countries that we know are extremely likely to default on their obligations,but there are specific clauses and obligations included that demand they hand over certain assets or lands should they default.......
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_default
One thing people don’t realise is there are 4 types of debts: Government Debt, Household Debt, Financial Sector Debt and Non Financial Sector Debt. The 310% of China is Total Debt which is the sum of all 4. The 117% of US is the Government Debt, the China equivalent is 55%. Now, Singapore Government Debt is higher than US.https://www.thebalance.com/national-debt-by-year-compared-to-gdp-and-major-events-3306287
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-debt-and-deficit-projections-hit-records/
Still, the U.S. is destined for much higher levels of debt when the contagion passes. In a worst-case scenario, the CRFB predicts debt could reach 117% of GDP by 2025, easily exceeding the record of 106% set in 1946.
The point is not who has what debt. All nations in the world has debt. Singapore actually has quite a bit.helooop,that's exactly what I am saying ...read my post again please
After I buy my house finished liao knnNever depend on CPF for retirement.![]()
After I buy my house finished liao knn