Sorry. I didn't state clearly. My friend runs a tuition centre. So, my friend is the boss of this setup. He has to pay more now for every tutor he hires to teach at his centre..........but his tutors get lower income!!! ......if you can get happy with the paper gains in the CPF account of these tutors's cases, then I'm sorry I'd made a wrong statement.
There is a legal way to circumvent this. Anyway, with regards to your post, allow me to raise my views about it. CPF is a necessary step to secure the wages of staff for retirement and medical care. However, over the years, CPF savings has been used to manipulate the market forces. Let me raise a few points here:
1. Members can use CPF money to pay for housing
2. Members can use CPF to participate in investments and buy investment linked insurance
3. Members can use Medisave to co-pay medical expenses
However, you notice that CPF (employer and employee combined) has become a manipulator of market forces and used to further gabrament's political agenda because CPF now belongs to members BUT with various conditions attached to the monies.
Compounding this, Sinkiepore, which considers itself as a 1st world country, has no laws on Minimal Wage. This is totally unacceptable.
Putting it all together, I am for employer contributing to CPF but I am not for CPF for the manipulation capabilities it now has over market forces.
It is more than that actually, but it will take me a chapter to illustrate everything down here so I hope this post will just evoke some thoughts, that's all.