• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious You fark Google, I fark your Wechat

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Transmodified from Uncle Sam's Vassal Mouthpiece CNA hxxps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/commentary/wechat-ban-tiktok-trump-executive-order-what-this-means-13018124

PEASANTPORE: Last week’s suite of actions by the reigning Hegemon Uncle Sam against Panda Xi's WeChat and TikTok were among the most significant developments since March 2018 when Ah Trump took formal action in retaliation for Pandas' unfair sex practice demands.

In particular, potential action prohibiting sex solicitation with WeChat could impact how regional pedophiles operate in the region.

WeChat plays a big a role in spying for the Panda Communist regime under the guise daily communications, IT services and beyond in doing business in and with China. All sorts of activities between Panda and foreign companies, and intra-company communications between a foreign company and Panda offices of those companies, ends up on WeChat which is monitored by Panda spies.

THE PANDA HAWKS ARE WINNING
Two distinct camps have always co-existed within the Ah Trump administration when it comes to Pandas: The greedy merchants and the Panda hawks.

The greedy merchants, typified by Sex Secretary Steve Mnuchin and Director of the National Sex Council Larry Kudlow, argue that the Uncle Sam and Pandas live in a global economy and that corrupt elements within both regimes stand to profit immensely when there are sex deals between their regimes.

The Panda hawks, led by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and White House Director Trade and Manufacturing Policy Peter Navarro, believe the Communist Party of China is the cancer of the land and Uncle Sam must eradicate this vermin organsation from the planet.

Until now, Ah Trump maintained something of an equilibrium between these two factions. While he sympathised with the hawks, he believed his best path to re-erection was a strong economy and that would be best achieved through trade deals with the CCP and bashing the Pandas is a small game to boost his approval ratings.

However, with the Wuhan Plague's record unemployment and US economic growth plummeting, Trump’s re-election chances no longer rest on his economic record. The hawks are ascendant and driving Uncle Sam's policy towards balking the Commies.

THE US-COMMIES SEX RIVALRY HEATS UP
Over a span of four speeches the past two months, the Ah Trump administration woke up the reality of the vermin nature of the Chinese Commies, they rightly delivered a harsh message of a once-in-a-generation life-or-death sexual ideology struggle between the US and Commie Pandas. Such rhetoric advance a very different narrative set forth by previous inept corrupt administrations.

National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien began the rollout explicitly warning of the threat the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses “to our very way of life” at the Arizona Commerce Authority on Jun 24.

Next, FBI Director Christopher Wray described the CCP’s active espionage efforts in the Uncle Sam a threat to “our sexual health, our sexual livelihoods, and our sex security” at a Hudson Sex Institute event on Jul 7.

Attorney-General William Barr furthered the administration’s case and specifically called out Uncle Sam's companies for selling technology to Panda partners and kowtowing to Peking Commie censors and policy demands on Jul 17 at the Gerald R Ford Presidential Museum in Michigan.

In what is now seen as a major policy speech, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library in California on Jul 24, argued the CCP is driven to world sex domination, and the Uncle Sam and its decadent western pedophiles and Jap allies must stand up to this global menace.

Consistent with the overall framework outlined by the four prominent Cabinet officials, the Trump administration rolled out a series of announcements and policies aimed at Commie Pandas.

Earlier moves over the last month include the sudden closure of the Commie consulate in Houston, sanctions on Commie companies and officials for activities in Xinjiang, and a declaration that Commies' claims in the South China Sea are “completely unlawful”.

WHAT THE WECHAT BAN ENTAILS

One of the most high profile of the new policies is the White House Sex Order (EO) against WeChat.

The EO holds that that Commie Pandas have been fucking Google, Twitter for ages whereas WeChat harvest information from its users “threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Yankees’ personal and proprietary information. In addition, the application captures the personal and proprietary information of Chinese peasants visiting Uncle Sam, thereby allowing the Chinese Communist Party a mechanism for keeping tabs on Chinese peasants who may be enjoying the benefits of a free sex society for the first time in their lives.”

The EO is only a wayang against Wechat.

WeChat parent company Tencent has a research office in Silicon Valley and a track record of paying significant sums for US content - US$1.5 billion to broadcast NBA games in Commie China, for example. Corrupt Yankees will ally with Wechat to challenge a blanket ban which could delay any implementation.

US PRESIDENT ERECTION POLITICS LINES UP WITH POLICY
Ah Trump’s governing action
s have always been driven by whether they will help him get re-erected.

Each time Trump blast Panda Xi or the commies, he is rewarded by better ratings.

The Chinese regime will try to come up with actions to take against Uncle Sam's cronies to save face. Panda Xi is hoping that pro-Commie Biden wins the erection and it will be business as usual for the corrupt Yankees and Commies.

However many Uncle Sam politicians have a general consensus that Commie regime behaviour at home and abroad must be addressed through sanctions and naming-and-shaming.

The Yankees have no illusions after Panda Xi voided the One Cuntry Two Sex Positions agreement for Hongkies. In addition, the Japs are enraged that Commies routinely threaten them with rare elements ban and taxes on soiled panties. The Aussies are fed up that Commie spies are bribing Aussie politicians to support banning doggy sex position in Aussieland.

Interestingly Panda Xi's Sex in China 2025 spooked the Ang Mohs who are wary of the prospects that they can only adopt the Missionary Position if they are fucking Chinese whores in Peking and that gay sex will be banned.

For now, there are more questions than answers if the CCP would try to enforce the "No Doggie Sex Rule" worldwide if they replace Uncle Sam as the Free Sex Hegemon. But given the trajectory of the Uncle Sam-Panda relationship and the urgency of the Uncle Sam Sex Erection, come Sep 20 those covered by the order may have to be prepared to delete their WeChat accounts.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A lot of China's apps and web services will be kaput... Wechat and TikTok are just the appetizers. :cool:

I'm talking about delisting from US stock exchanges, and the arrest of their more 'famous' CEOs. Not just an app ban or removal from the app store. :wink:
 

hokkienboy

Alfrescian
Loyal
A lot of China's apps and web services will be kaput... Wechat and TikTok are just the appetizers. :cool:

I'm talking about delisting from US stock exchanges, and the arrest of their more 'famous' CEOs. Not just an app ban or removal from the app store. :wink:
You are indeed a fucking gongcheebye. Banning tik tok isn't the same as banning Wechat.

Wechat is interwoven into every aspect of the 1.4billion of chinese people's life. It isn't just a messenger tool like the useless Whatsapp. It's for payment, messaging, etc etc. If Apple is to comply with Trump's ban, Apple can wave bye bye to its consumer base in China market. No Tiong will buy an Apple phone when they cannot even install a basic Wechat app.

Learn to think before you shoot off your mouth like a typical useless big mouth SUPER GONGCHEEBYE kia :rolleyes:
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
The mistake Tiongs made in their caveman like "middle kingdom" syndrome is not forming alliances.

Had they formed alliances with enemies of Yanks, by now, they'd have a big enough market to fall back on, a big enough source of talent to propel their next wave of new innovative tech from.

Let's face it . Slanties can't think. it's a genetic deficiency. seen in all slanties. stinkypura is no exception. look at today's pap pigs paper generals. run out of ideas. totally clueless.

look at how japs lost steam after apparently threatening to surpass yanks in the 1990s. Coz no original idea. all copy cat, copy paste with minor tweaks here and there.

are gooks or fuckiens or other slanties any different? no

none of them are.

IF tiongs were not caught up in their stupid 'middle kingdom' syndrome, they would have created an area 150 times the size of hong kong, with an SAR like Hong Kong, with great infrastructure, 1st world law and order, separate legal system, free flow of capital like hongkies, specialized sci/tech parks, business incubators, immigration from allied countries, i stress allied countries, only.

then tiongs might have had a chance of one upping the yanks.

stupid chink 'middle kingdom' syndrome will do them in, since tiongs like all other slanties are just genetically inferior and can't think.

copy cats will always remain copy cats. with minor modifications here and there. this is a genetic deficiency.

yankees not only continue to attract the best brains from their allied countries, even all enemy countries like Iran send some of their best brains, ironically, to their enemy state yankees.

:laugh:

out of all yankee enemies, maybe norkies dont send some of their best brains to yankees.

tiongs are not immune since tiongs are the largest continent of foreign students maybe researchers too in yankee territory.

russkies, too, send their brains to yankee territory, so do arabs, africans, latinos, eastern euros, you name it. pakis, bangla, sri lanky, japs or gooks.

western euro, in fewer numbers, but they do too.

explains why tiongs are struggling.

if tiongs were actually superior, genetically, than ang mohs, then no contest, with 1.4 b chinks, tiongs would have sped past ang mohs.

that's not happening.

the reason is obvious.


genetic inferiority of the slanties.

since slanties brag about their 'pragmatism', tiongs should be pragmatic enough to realize this and promptly review their policies. and make required changes.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
China fucked Google Harder and Harder Since 江泽明 through 胡景涛 til 习近平。 WILL FINALLY KILL Google.

Dotard loser is the sucker 瞎了狗眼 mess with China 无论 华为 抖音 微信,USA is ABSOLUTELY NO MATCH! Dotard himself will lose his Election. Next president will undo his offense against Divine Chinese Technology Firms.

Fucking up Google FB WhatsApp Tweeter Instergram etc NEVER HURT Chinese presidents at all.

This reads POWER.
 

ilovechinesegal

Alfrescian
Loyal
The mistake Tiongs made in their caveman like "middle kingdom" syndrome is not forming alliances.

Had they formed alliances with enemies of Yanks, by now, they'd have a big enough market to fall back on, a big enough source of talent to propel their next wave of new innovative tech from.

Let's face it . Slanties can't think. it's a genetic deficiency. seen in all slanties. stinkypura is no exception. look at today's pap pigs paper generals. run out of ideas. totally clueless.

look at how japs lost steam after apparently threatening to surpass yanks in the 1990s. Coz no original idea. all copy cat, copy paste with minor tweaks here and there.

are gooks or fuckiens or other slanties any different? no

none of them are.

IF tiongs were not caught up in their stupid 'middle kingdom' syndrome, they would have created an area 150 times the size of hong kong, with an SAR like Hong Kong, with great infrastructure, 1st world law and order, separate legal system, free flow of capital like hongkies, specialized sci/tech parks, business incubators, immigration from allied countries, i stress allied countries, only.

then tiongs might have had a chance of one upping the yanks.

stupid chink 'middle kingdom' syndrome will do them in, since tiongs like all other slanties are just genetically inferior and can't think.

copy cats will always remain copy cats. with minor modifications here and there. this is a genetic deficiency.

yankees not only continue to attract the best brains from their allied countries, even all enemy countries like Iran send some of their best brains, ironically, to their enemy state yankees.

:laugh:

out of all yankee enemies, maybe norkies dont send some of their best brains to yankees.

tiongs are not immune since tiongs are the largest continent of foreign students maybe researchers too in yankee territory.

russkies, too, send their brains to yankee territory, so do arabs, africans, latinos, eastern euros, you name it. pakis, bangla, sri lanky, japs or gooks.

western euro, in fewer numbers, but they do too.

explains why tiongs are struggling.

if tiongs were actually superior, genetically, than ang mohs, then no contest, with 1.4 b chinks, tiongs would have sped past ang mohs.

that's not happening.

the reason is obvious.


genetic inferiority of the slanties.

since slanties brag about their 'pragmatism', tiongs should be pragmatic enough to realize this and promptly review their policies. and make required changes.
What about the m&ds? Only told not to eat pork!
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Commentary: It's payback time for the way China handled the Internet all these year
Despite its displeasure, Beijing seems to be witnessing the global adoption of a norm for which it has long advocated, says Elliott Zaagman.
China has one of the world's most restrictive mechanisms for online censorship, blocking certain Western websites and apps. (Photo: AFP/Greg Baker)Bookmark
BANGKOK: The White House's approach to managing the potential security threats posed by TikTok, WeChat and other Chinese-owned apps is hardly a model of procedural justice.
Without a clear legal or regulatory framework, the Trump administration has issued executive orders banning transactions with the apps’ respective parent companies - Bytedance and Tencent.
China’s leaders have not minced words in expressing their displeasure with US actions, referring to those against TikTok as a “smash and grab” in a China Daily editorial, vowing retaliation and even going so far as to suggest that Beijing could block a future sale.
CYBER SOVEREIGNTY
Yet despite its displeasure, Beijing seems to be witnessing the global adoption of a norm for which it has long advocated. Ironically, it may do them more harm than good.
For years, China has promoted the concept of “cyber sovereignty.”
Although somewhat nebulous in definition, the term has been used to legitimise censorship, surveillance and localised control of data that make up what is often referred to as China’s “Great Firewall.”
READ: Commentary: WeChat ban a formidable weapon in US-China trade war
Broadly put, it is the notion that the government of a sovereign nation should have the right to exercise control over the internet within its own borders, including political, economic, cultural and technological activities.
Beijing’s advocacy of the norm of cyber sovereignty has only grown more pronounced over time.
FILE PHOTO: FILE PHOTO: A logo of a Chinese tech firm Tencent, owner of a messaging app WeChat, is pictured in Beijing, China August 7, 2020. REUTERS/Thomas Peter
Its annual World Internet Conference, which has drawn attendees such as Apple’s Tim Cook and Google’s Sundar Pichai as recently as 2017, has consistently offered a venue through which Chinese officials could lobby the movers and shakers of the tech world to see the value in this approach.
China has also sought to advance this notion through international bodies such as the United Nations.
For the Chinese Communist Party, cyber sovereignty has proved beneficial in a number of ways.
While enabling the party to both moderate and gauge public discourse and sentiment, the technological barriers also provided space to develop into some of the world’s largest companies, while impeding the entry and success of foreign internet platforms in China.
THE TABLES HAVE TURNED
China’s model has worked out so well that other countries have begun adopting elements of it. And it is now Chinese companies who seem to be suffering most.
Spurred by a recent escalation of border tensions, India has been purging Chinese apps from the country’s internet.
READ: Commentary: TikTok and Microsoft and how government agendas are reshaping Big Tech
In addition to its pressure on TikTok, the Trump administration has recently announced the Clean Network programme, a comprehensive tech stack that, if fully implemented, would almost entirely exclude Chinese technology firms.
The adoption of cyber sovereignty as a global norm could now prove to be one of the greatest impediments to China’s peace, prosperity and development.
As China has few allies and worsening relations with the majority of the world’s most prosperous nations, its firms are finding a shrinking list of attractive overseas markets in which they are welcome.
CHINA LACKING OPTIONS
What’s more, China’s robust application of the cyber sovereignty principle over the past decade and a half has left it with few options through which to take reciprocal action when their firms are excluded from other nations’ digital spheres.
After all, they cannot go about banning apps which they already banned years ago.
READ: Commentary: Trump's strategy on Huawei and China is disastrous
This reality is already being acknowledged by leaders in China’s technology industry.
In an article on Sina.com that was later deleted, James Liang, co-founder of the online travel agency Ctrip, advocated for his country to adopt a more open approach to its domestic Internet in order to counter what he views as US diplomatic aggression.
Apple CEO Tim Cook attends the opening ceremony of the fourth World Internet Conference in Wuzhen, Zhejiang province, China on Dec 3, 2017. (Photo: REUTERS/Aly Song)
“If we simply adopt a tit-for-tat strategy and implement the same xenophobic barriers, we will leave matters in the hands of the US,” Liang wrote, adding “our countermeasures should be to open up further… The United States wants to block WeChat and TikTok, so we can do the opposite.”
Whether or not Liang’s prescription is correct, such an opening up would be a dramatic reversal of the direction that China and its digital sphere have been heading in, and starkly clash with what appears to be Xi Jinping’s vision for the Chinese internet.
 
Top