• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Woman hit by bike wheel 'flung from 14th floor' dies

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]Woman hit by bike wheel 'flung from 14th floor' dies[/h]
PUBLISHED ON JUN 8, 2014 7:57 AM
2 8 0 0PRINTEMAIL



Madam Mahani (above) died in hospital last Friday after slipping into a coma last Tuesday. The 67-year-old was hit on the head by a bicycle wheel, allegedly thrown by a teenager from a block of flats in Eunos Crescent on May 16. -- PHOTOS: JASMAN ABDUL AZIZ, SHIN MIN DAILY






  • [*=left]
    [*=left]






BY HOE PEI SHAN

A 67-year-old woman, who was hit by a bicycle wheel allegedly thrown by a teenage boy from the 14th floor of an HDB block of flats in Eunos Crescent, died in hospital last Friday night.
Madam Mahani Abdullah had undergone emergency spinal surgery at the Singapore General Hospital after the wheel hit her on the head on May 16.
Last Tuesday, while she was in a high dependency ward following the operation, her heart stopped. Doctors managed to resuscitate her, but she slipped into a coma.
After state prosecutors learnt that Madam Mahani's condition had worsened, the charge of a rash act against teenager Abdul Hamid Rahmat, 16, was amended to one of grievous hurt last Friday.


- See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/si...14th-floor-dies-20140608#sthash.3fULOPNX.dpuf
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
For the good of society, all works out well.

A loser woman who ain't got enough inside her CPF and a m&d who is already a loser the moment he was born.

Two losers cancelling out each other. LoL
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This type of fucktard should be remand in prison for life.

We should simplify the penal code ....one sentence for all crimes, that is death penalty. You screw up, you die. Makes sinkapore a unique state and also get to prove that deterrent works.
 

blindswordsman

Alfrescian
Loyal
[h=1]....After state prosecutors learnt that Madam Mahani's condition had worsened, the charge of a rash act against teenager Abdul Hamid Rahmat, 16, was amended to one of grievous hurt last Friday.

This teenager should have been charged with manslaughter. Causing grievous hurt does not seem to be the appropriate indictment for his reckless and dangerous act. The AGC should amend the charge to send strong deterrent message to all high rise litter killers in SG. Pappies are really hopeless when dealing with crime.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This teenager should have been charged with manslaughter. Causing grievous hurt does not seem to be the appropriate indictment for his reckless and dangerous act. The AGC should amend the charge to send strong deterrent message to all high rise litter killers in SG. Pappies are really hopeless when dealing with crime.

Has new AG taken over?
 

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
This teenager should have been charged with manslaughter.....

Agreed. And sixteen years old is adult enough to realize the potential danger of such a rash act. I do not know how the courts will come to conclusion on this case, but I have gotten quite tired of hearing charges for minors be reduced because they are minors. A teenager has the ability to think and understand issue more complex than a two or three year old toddler.

Cheers!
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Actually such incidents should never occur if the HDB flats are better designed-example the walkways beneath all HDB blocks should be sheltered such that if anybody throw things down, it will hit the shelter, not pedestrians.
However the govt build sheltered walkways to connect blocks (and not in every block) only many years after occupation -as part of upgrading to win votes.
Yet Penang boy Khaw even preached about not turning elections into an auction between political parties promising voters as much “goodies” as they can-talk about flip flop!

No different from the safety barriers at above ground MRT stations that were built only after many casualties.

This is what happen when Ministers are in ivory towers preaching about integration with foreigners- while peasants suffer.
 
Last edited:

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Agreed. And sixteen years old is adult enough to realize the potential danger of such a rash act. I do not know how the courts will come to conclusion on this case, but I have gotten quite tired of hearing charges for minors be reduced because they are minors. A teenager has the ability to think and understand issue more complex than a two or three year old toddler.

Cheers!

The laws are too complex for people to understand. Just impose mandatory death sentence for every crime, then people will get it. You do the crime, you die. Simple to understand, simple to implement, simple all round.
 

escher

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The guy should have reserve the wheel for the PAP MPs.

This type of fucktard should be thrown down from top floor ...

... while those MIWs were having walkabout on ground floor :mad:

PAP MPs know how to siam very well. The wheel would likely hit one of the sycophantic CCC members following the MP around.


That bicycle tyre should fit on any of the PAPs and lighted up to make a bad PAP into a good PAP.
 

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
In actual cases, every crime needs to be investigated, every accused person deserves a fair trial and the motive(s) needs to be established before a fair or deserving punishment is meted out. Someone may be killed, but was it premeditated? Was it revenge? Self defence? It is not easy, and there may be cases the lawyer is very glib or screws up the whole case. If it was an accident and the accused just happened to be there and the thing happened, it is not right to label him/her a murderer. If you killed someone who attacked you, should you be sentenced to death? In this time and age, I think it should be innocent until proven guilty. It is not right to swap the page with a wide brush for every similar offence. It is not simple.

Cheers!

The laws are too complex for people to understand. Just impose mandatory death sentence for every crime, then people will get it. You do the crime, you die. Simple to understand, simple to implement, simple all round.
 
Top