• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Jacky Chan looked older than Bruce Lee?

Some people age faster than others. This is not unusual.
 
All Bruce Lee movies were rated B in uncensored originals with minor flashes of nudities. In Singapore, of course these minor scenes were censored off. I've wondered why he did that and my best guess was, the early 1970s was the peak of the liberalisation era and he played along with it to make himself look less conservative.

Maybe you should look ar Spore from outside rather than from inside/out :) While the rest of the world moves on, Spore is still a nanny state controlled by the dowager & her minions. Publications such as Cosmopolitan was at one time banned in Spore because it didn't reflect the values of Sporean:eek: Which is very funny because for many years Cosmopolitan was sold in Spore.
 
there is this chap that bears an uncanny resemblance to Bruce Lee.....the guy played the goalkeeper in Stephen Chow's movie Shaolin Football
 
Maybe you should look ar Spore from outside rather than from inside/out :) While the rest of the world moves on, Spore is still a nanny state controlled by the dowager & her minions. Publications such as Cosmopolitan was at one time banned in Spore because it didn't reflect the values of Sporean:eek: Which is very funny because for many years Cosmopolitan was sold in Spore.

In sec. sch., I had to arrange with US penpals to smuggle post Playboy and Penthouse magazines to me. Quite a profitable biz to sustain my sec. sch. lifestyle. :D
 
6e91fe21jw1dry8b467sxj.jpg
 
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Zcf-z8pUEAQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
there is this chap that bears an uncanny resemblance to Bruce Lee.....the guy played the goalkeeper in Stephen Chow's movie Shaolin Football


That's right. He was later selected to play Bruce Lee in a TV series based on the life of Bruce Lee. It was screened over Ch 8 or Ch U about 2 years ago. He acted very well in that series.
 
Bruce Lee movies are boring to watch. I love Jackie Chan movies, great stunts he performed.

Bruce Lee is a martial artist, Jackie Chan an entertainer. Cannot compare one.

I can understand why the uncles here all love Bruce Lee as my old man likes him too. LOL!

Bruce Lee's movies are boring? You got to be kidding! Every fight scene in his movies has been etched on the memories of those who watched them, whereas Jackie Chan's stunts are all the same old stuff that gets repeated in every movie, totally forgettable. And that's why when Bruce Lee died, everyone bemoaned the fact there will never be able to see such extraordinary fight scenes anymore, whereas Jackie Chan's movies simply went down the drain.
 
That's right. He was later selected to play Bruce Lee in a TV series based on the life of Bruce Lee. It was screened over Ch 8 or Ch U about 2 years ago. He acted very well in that series.

He was lucky as I was more handsome but refused to cut my ponytail, so couldn't play the role of Bruce. OK, OK, just joking. But seriously, a fight Bruce Lee and Wing Chun school is about speed and strength. Total opposite of the Taiji school, which is slow and steady and borrow strength.
 
He was lucky as I was more handsome but refused to cut my ponytail, so couldn't play the role of Bruce. OK, OK, just joking. But seriously, a fight Bruce Lee and Wing Chun school is about speed and strength. Total opposite of the Taiji school, which is slow and steady and borrow strength.

It's heartening to know that there's someone here on this forum who is so knowledgable about Bruce Lee's brand of martial art. What Bruce Lee developed and taught could be applied in any situation readily and effectively whereas other forms such as Taiji may not work under certain circumstances and therefore cannot be readily applied or effective.
 
Bruce Lee's movies are boring? You got to be kidding! Every fight scene in his movies has been etched on the memories of those who watched them, whereas Jackie Chan's stunts are all the same old stuff that gets repeated in every movie, totally forgettable. And that's why when Bruce Lee died, everyone bemoaned the fact there will never be able to see such extraordinary fight scenes anymore, whereas Jackie Chan's movies simply went down the drain.

No offense bro, but 一个打十个? No thanks, I'd rather read Uncle Ram's kopitiam tales in this forum.

It's the 70s afterall. I can understand. LOL
 
No offense bro, but 一个打十个? No thanks, I'd rather read Uncle Ram's kopitiam tales in this forum.

It's the 70s afterall. I can understand. LOL

No offense. I was born in the eighties so missed all the 70s and 80s stuff. Never too late to catch up on YouTube and DVDs. For old man like you who prefer that womanizer canafe, you are of course entitled to your opinion. :D
 
Last edited:
No offense bro, but 一个打十个? No thanks, I'd rather read Uncle Ram's kopitiam tales in this forum.

It's the 70s afterall. I can understand. LOL

No worries bro. Whatever Bruce Lee showed to the world with his fight scenes can be equally applied and as effective now as it was back then in the 70s.
 
No offense. I was born in the eighties so missed all the 70s and 80s stuff. Never too late to catch up on YouTube and DVDs. For old man like you who prefer that womanizer canafe, you are of course entitled to your opinion. :D

Born in the 80s? Hmm.... OK noted! Yep, we are entitled to our own opinions on movies and how they should be made.
 
No offense bro, but 一个打十个? No thanks, I'd rather read Uncle Ram's kopitiam tales in this forum.

It's the 70s afterall. I can understand. LOL

yes...during that time chrograph fighting movement is not taken seriously ...
 
No offense bro, but 一个打十个? No thanks, I'd rather read Uncle Ram's kopitiam tales in this forum.

It's the 70s afterall. I can understand. LOL

One versus ten is impossible to beat up and win unless you're above 20-year adult and the other 10 are below 5-year kids. Don't believe the movies. One versus five is already impossible regardless of how well trained you are, unless you're armed. That's why offence of rioting is set at five.
 
Last edited:
Care to explain this sentence?

It's about the inch punch. You don't swing your fist to punch. The action of swing gives your opponent the time to prepare defence.

To deliver that without swinging your fist, you need strength. I also think Bruce Lee overtraining contributed to his premature demise.

An inch punch when carried out is very swift and spectacular. You can't see the fighter swinging his fist at all and in split second, the opponent is down.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top