• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

What will the Workers Party do on 14 January 2013?

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
2,378
Points
113
Will the WP Parliamentarians be silent, reticent and fearful and not raise this AIM issue in Parliament? And will they continue to rely on their Vellama modus operandi, i.e. remain silent and let ordinary citizens, netizens and bloggers do the work, carry out the heavy lifting and take the risks on their behalf (even as these WP MPs enjoy the privileges, perks and benefits of being a $16,041/month MP)?

With all that have been published by bloggers and netizens, it is to be expected and simply a matter of time before the incorrigible Dauphin and his merry men latched on to something and revert back to what his father, he and his lackeys do best, i.e. threaten to sue or sue. Old habits die hard.

Parliamentary privilege is a legal immunity enjoyed by all MPs, including those from the Workers Party. The purpose of Parliamentary privilege is to allow MPs to speak freely during ordinary Parliamentary proceedings without any fear of legal action. Non-elected politicians, bloggers, netizens and the ordinary man in the street do not enjoy such a privilege. Notwithstanding this lack of privilege, these non-elected politicians, bloggers, netizens and the ordinary man in the street have spoken up on many and varied issues. To their credit, they have done a lot of work. They have carried out the heavy lifting. And they have courageously taken the risks in doing so.

The AIM issue directly affects the WP. The WP has a presence of 6 MPs and 2 NCMPS in Parliament. It is for the WP Parliamentarians to raise and pursue the AIM issue in Parliament.

Voters have also voiced their concern about the AIM issue. Voters have voted the WP into Parliament for a reason. To be their voices. It is the one of the primary duties and responsibilities of being an elected member of a First World Parliament to voice the concerns of your constituents and the electorate in Parliament.

In order to get to the bottom of this AIM issue once and for all, it is incumbent on the WP to raise and pursue this matter in Parliament when Parliament sits on 14 January 2013. If it does not but instead, expects non-elected politicians, bloggers, netizens and the ordinary man in the street to continue to raise and pursue the matter outside of Parliament, it will merely prove, once and yet again, all that have been said by skeptics and critics about the Workers Party and the pusillanimous leadership of the Workers Party.
 
Last edited:
WP was elected to parliament to represent the people not to reprsent themselves...

Parliament is the place for debates over policies .,.. not mindless politicking,.. you wan to see fights??

go to Ukraine.. their politiCAL leader is world heavey weight champ
 
A parliamentarian represents his constituency and as such also rep the country of which his constituent is a citizen of.

If WP think this issue is somethg that concerns the well being of their constituents they shld raise it right?
 
A parliamentarian represents his constituency and as such also rep the country of which his constituent is a citizen of.

If WP think this issue is somethg that concerns the well being of their constituents they shld raise it right?
 
Brother,I agree with you,it is now time for action.God bless,amen,上帝保佑,阿们。
 
"For Parliament to function effectively as a check on the Executive Government, it is necessary for the House to consist of elected Members from political parties
other than the ruling party
." Towards a First World Parliament, Manifesto 2011, Published by The Workers’ Party

How exactly does the WP "check on the Executive Government" if it remains silent, reticent and is fearful of raising this AIM issue in Parliament?
 
Last edited:
I find the development interesting.

It seems PAP supporters and SDP supporters had ganged up against WP.

Now i wonder, has WP become the common enemy?
 
I find the development interesting.
It seems PAP supporters and SDP supporters had ganged up against WP.
Now i wonder, has WP become the common enemy?

Every opposition party believes that they should be the people's choice of opposition party, however recent results have shown that the voters seem to favour Worker's Party over all the other opposition parties. Naturally, the other opposition parties, including SDP are feeling threatened by WP's success because with current momentum, the WP can possibly change the whole political scene into a two-party system and making all the other opposition parties virtually irrelevant. This explains why there is a lot of resentment over WP's success.
 
Last edited:
You didn't read the news?

Nope, but I did read what Low Thia Khiang had to say. This is what he declared:

"I welcome the Prime Minister's announcement to review the town councils' fundamentals as well as to investigate. I welcome the response to the issues the Workers' Party have raised to the attention of Singaporeans."

Whilst ordinary citizens, netizens and bloggers have pointed out the unacceptable and jarring conflict of interest in the Dauphin appointing MND which is headed by Khaw Boon Wan, Chairman of the PAP to look into a company set up by the PAP, the SG of the WP "welcomes" it.

As such, I wouldn't expect too much from the 6+2 WP MPs beyond their usual tokenism. It's MPs will continue to rake in their $16,041/month MP allowance and let unelected politicians, ordinary citizens, netizens and bloggers take all the risks and do all the hard work that these 6+2 have been elected as First World Parliamentarians to do.
 
Dear PT

I expect the report to be a whitewash, the question is a matter of politics, do u criticise a report before it is released as a whitewash or after. More a matter of style rather than substance in this regards.

The PM has clearly disarmed the issue for the next sitting of parliament .




Locke











Nope, but I did read what Low Thia Khiang had to say. This is what he declared:

"I welcome the Prime Minister's announcement to review the town councils' fundamentals as well as to investigate. I welcome the response to the issues the Workers' Party have raised to the attention of Singaporeans."

Whilst ordinary citizens, netizens and bloggers have pointed out the unacceptable and jarring conflict of interest in the Dauphin appointing MND which is headed by Khaw Boon Wan, Chairman of the PAP to look into a company set up by the PAP, the SG of the WP "welcomes" it.

As such, I wouldn't expect too much from the 6+2 WP MPs beyond their usual tokenism. It's MPs will continue to rake in their $16,041/month MP allowance and let unelected politicians, ordinary citizens, netizens and bloggers take all the risks and do all the hard work that these 6+2 have been elected as First World Parliamentarians to do.
 
Back
Top