These guys are however great for chess. Really hard to beat them. You can see them think literally.
Maybe he is a future candidate for the opposition?
Maybe he is a future candidate for the opposition?
Tell that to the maths geek who became our PM.
Like I say before I like to give good advice to the SDP so you motherfuckers out there better listen up.
I think you're a little too sensitive. Sometimes I even wonder if you're too sensitive about Scroobal.
This is an internet forum. Nothing much is sacred. I don't take my views to be sacred. Yes, I think about what I write, but a lot of people also do that. Sometimes you have to defend your point of view - that is part and parcel of any kind of debate. If it comes across as driving too hard you can always close your browser.
I wasn't even criticising Jeremy Chen. My main point was that yellowarse, in choosing that particular article to highlight SDP in this place, wasn't being very wise. People have criticised SDP for other things and I'm just being precise about it - because after all they're about to come upon a critical juncture that will determine their future.
Yeh? I thought that you had a problem with him because he was cunning, manipulative play the two sides two faced snake.
Personally I don't have problems with arrogant pompous infallible put everybody else down behaviour.
In fact I don't even mind old fart that much.
What is fucking disgusting about Scroobal is how he behaves to those who disagree with him or those he ascertains are not with him, and on the other hand tries to be Mr Popular among all the others who agree with him and go along with him. Something like Sinkies inherited or acquired behaviour from oldfart.
Another characteristic of Sinkie behaviour is what I call the "suck up and piss down" syndrome. Old Fart sucked up to the British and they helped him with Operation Cold Store, then he pissed down on those who voted for him. Of course, these two things can be done simultaneously, something that one often sees in Sinkie office politics.
Yeh? I thought that you had a problem with him because he was cunning, manipulative play the two sides two faced snake.
Personally I don't have problems with arrogant pompous infallible put everybody else down behaviour. I recognise that Goh Meng Seng, when not driving the National Socialist - whoops I mean National Solidarity Party down into the ground exists for the sake of providing me with great comic entertainment. When you are here, and you are here longer than me, you ought to know that this place is inhabited by all manners of immature clowns and fools who do occasionally have extremely interesting political news to share for our benefit. Why would anybody read Dostoevsky when they can read sammy boy?
Coming up with shit that isn't obvious and isn't endlessly repetitive, on the other hand is hard work. HARD WORK. On top of that, trying to appear humble and not piss people off - is too much for me. So sorry hor. If people aren't getting carried away with their ideas those ideas are not worth getting carried away with in the first place. As a person who has read many many books I can tell you that almost all knowledge comes from pompous twats and if you can't stand pompous twats life is very sad.
In fact I don't even mind old fart that much. You take the good with the bad. Maybe it's because I come of age when he's about to loosen up the system and never got my tits squeezed hard by him. I usually ask of a person: did he do good for the country? Yes, even though he took all the credit that was due to people like Goh Keng Sweet. Then secondarily I ask "was he a dictator?" Yeh well...
Can you wake up your fucking idea? If you can't open your mouth in sammyboy without getting shot down what's going to happen when you get into parliament?
Like many of you I like to pak chwee cheng with my mental abilities but unlike you I recognise that joining a political party is not necessary to do this.
I don't know what Jeremy did in the past to get your goat and invite so much vitriol, but the fact that the opening post drew such a vehement response means that its has to some degree lived up to the the cut-and-thrust nature of an online forum.
I appreciate jw5's efforts to clean up this forum, but I have much less faith than he in the civility of anonymous internet monikers, so I ain't gonna lose much sleep over this.
I don't know what Jeremy did in the past to get your goat and invite so much vitriol, but the fact that the opening post drew such a vehement response means that it has to some degree lived up to the the cut-and-thrust nature of an online forum.
I appreciate jw5's efforts to clean up this forum, but I have much less faith than he in the civility of anonymous internet monikers, so I ain't gonna lose much sleep over this.
Then it turned out his vitriol was directed at you instead. That is an about turn I find puzzling.
Methinks they've crossed swords before on Jeremy's blog. And he thinks I'm Jeremy. That would explain it nicely.
I don't know what Jeremy did in the past to get your goat and invite so much vitriol, but the fact that the opening post drew such a vehement response means that it has to some degree lived up to the the cut-and-thrust nature of an online forum.
I appreciate jw5's efforts to clean up this forum, but I have much less faith than he in the civility of anonymous internet monikers, so I ain't gonna lose much sleep over this.
I'm not trying to clean up the forum or have any illusions about doing anything. The forum is neither my problem nor my responsibility.
Just want to whack back those who spew vitriol for no apparent purpose or justification.
They use bitchy "abrasive" words in this forum, they will get back more "abrasive" words.
They dare to try and bring it to real life, they will get a shock in real life.
Mouse,
Tell me where to start on Dostoevsky.