• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat What is your ERECTION HARDNESS INDEX?

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Doctor accused of rape gets his flaccid Erection Hardness Score revealed in court
46ec7e1c4e4973b6d626c3c30c87ddb7

The roast of Dr. Wee Teong Boo — who’s currently on trial for allegedly raping a patient in his clinic — continues in court. This time, the arguments lodged in defense of the doctor is that his Erection Hardness Score is just too low for penetration to take place, TODAY reported.
The 67-year-old general practitioner is accused of molesting and sexually violating a woman in 2015 when she visited his clinic in Bedok to get examined for an itch in her genitals and frequent urination. According to the victim, who was 23 at the time, Dr. Wee asked her to completely remove her shorts and underwear for an examination. The victim claims to have witnessed Wee with his pants unzipped, feeling a poking sensation in her genitals as his body rocked forward and backward. She filed a police report the next day.

But in court back in July, Dr. Wee’s own wife testified that the alleged rape could not have happened due to her husband’s erectile dysfunction since 2014. In her own words, his penis would remain “soft like a noodle” even when stimulated.

Appearing in High Court once again yesterday, Wee’s urologist testified as a defense witness. Dr. Peter Lim revealed to the court that Wee made an appointment with him six days after the alleged rape, complaining of erectile dysfunction and difficulties in urinating for the past three years, according to TODAY’s court report.
Three tests had been conducted to determine the causes of Wee’s erectile dysfunction. In the first test in January 2016, Wee’s Erection Hardness Score was rated three out of four, with four meaning full hardness and rigidity of the penis. Wee’s initial score suggested that his penis is hard enough for penetration, but not as hard as it could be. The test also revealed evidence of hormonal erectile dysfunction, which was then treated the same month.

The topic of Wee’s penis and penis rigidity is national news, by the way.
A second test was conducted in April 2016 at Changi General Hospital, during police investigations into the case. It corroborated the results of a third test, which confirmed the urologist’s suspicions that Wee’s erectile dysfunction was vein-related, and was due to the lack of blood flowing to the penis. Conducted this year, the third test showed that Wee had the lowest Erection Hardness Score of 1 — indicating a penis that is larger, but not hard.
Dr. Lim also affirmed that Wee would find it extremely difficult to “penetrate anything” without the help of a drug called Caverject. His penis would remain in a “flaccid state” without the drug.
The trial continues this afternoon.

The post Doctor accused of rape gets his flaccid Erection Hardness Score revealed in court appeared first on Coconuts.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
What a cock case (pun intended). The old doctor has lost all dignity, he might as well just admit his guilt and spare himself further embarrassment.
 

Patriot

Alfrescian
Loyal
20180507_wee_teong_boo_mf_3.jpg


Koh Mui Fong/TODAYAn erectile dysfunction test on general practitioner Wee Teong Boo, who is accused of raping a 23-year-old patient in his clinic, found that he had the lowest erection hardness score of one, his urologist told the High Court
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Itchy pussy normally due to allergy reaction, which may cause eczema. Even the shorts/pant or panty you wear could be the reason. Stop wearing it and that itch may disappear. After several days of course. Not immediately.
 

Patriot

Alfrescian
Loyal
Erectile dysfunction made it ‘extremely difficult’ for doctor accused of rape to have sex, says urologist

By VICTOR LOH

20180507_wee_teong_boo_mf_3.jpg
Koh Mui Fong/TODAYAn erectile dysfunction test on general practitioner Wee Teong Boo, who is accused of raping a 23-year-old patient in his clinic, found that he had the lowest erection hardness score of one, his urologist told the High Court

Published18 OCTOBER, 2018
UPDATED 19 OCTOBER, 2018

SINGAPORE — An erectile dysfunction test on general practitioner Wee Teong Boo, who is accused of raping a 23-year-old patient in his clinic, found that he had the lowest erection hardness score of one, his urologist told the High Court on Thursday (Oct 18).

Dr Peter Lim, who was testifying as a defence witness in the trial of Wee, said it was very difficult for Wee to get an erection without Caverject — a drug which was used to induce an erection in Wee for the tests.


"Without the aid of the medication Caverject, it is extremely difficult for Dr Wee to penetrate anything", said Dr Lim. He added that without the drug, Wee's erection would be in a "flaccid state".

The Court heard that six days after the alleged rape, Wee went to see Dr Lim on Jan 5, 2016, to complain of erectile dysfunction and difficulty in passing urine for the past three years.

When asked by Dr Lim to rate the rigidity of his erection, Wee, 67, gave it an Erection Hardness Score of three out of four, with one indicating a penis that is larger but not hard, while four means full hardness and rigidity. A score of three suggests that the penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard.

A total of three tests were subsequently conducted to determine the causes of his erectile dysfunction, the court heard.

There are five causes of erectile dysfunction, namely psychological, arteriogenic (lack of blood flowing to the organ), venogenic (vein related), endocrine (hormonal) and neurogenic (nerve-related), Dr Lim explained at the start of the hearing.

The results of the initial test, which Dr Lim ordered after Wee’s first visit to his clinic, showed that Wee's erectile dysfunction was not arteriogenic or venogenic, despite Dr Lim's initial suspicions that this was the case.

Wee had also shown evidence of hormonal erectile dysfunction during the first consultation on Jan 5, 2016, which was then treated on Jan 13, 2016, by Dr Lim.

Wee was also being treated for an enlarged prostate, and had a medical history of diabetes and high blood pressure.

The results on Jan 13, 2016, also showed that there were leaks in the veins that deliver blood to the testicles, but no leakage in Wee's veins leading to his penis.

However, the second test in April 2016 administered at Changi General Hospital as part of police investigations showed that the results were completely different from what was uncovered in the first test ordered by Dr Lim.

Dr Lim was unaware of the second test until June 6 this year, which led him to order a third test of Wee's erectile dysfunction.

The third test, which was an objective test by a machine unlike the previous two conducted by radiologists, confirmed Dr Lim's initial suspicion that Wee's erectile dysfunction was arteriogenic and venogenic, on top of his earlier diagnosis of hormonal erectile dysfunction.

The latest results also meant that Wee had the lowest Erection Hardness Score of 1.

When asked by Justice Chua Lee Ming if the 2018 test could determine Wee's Erection Hardness Score in 2016, the defence's expert witness said that a few years "could not have made (the erectile dysfunction) materially worse".

"These diseases take years to establish," the consultant urologist at Gleneagles Hospital added.

Dr Lim said that results of the second test – which he saw only a few weeks back – corroborates the third study administered by vascular doctor Sriram Narayanan.

When quizzed by the Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Wong Kok Weng during cross-examination about the test results, Dr Lim admitted that he is not an expert in administrating the tests, and could not say if they were administered properly.

DPP Wong also brought up Wee's earlier testimony that he had penetrative sex with his wife “once or twice a month”, and he would be able to have an erection “most of the time”.

"There was no suggestion in Dr Wee’s earlier cross examination that he needed guidance for penetrative sex," DPP Wong said.

Wee's alleged victim, now 26, was at his clinic in Bedok on Dec 30, 2015, to seek treatment for gastric problems, frequent urination and an itch on her genitals. Wee was checking her lower abdomen before he allegedly raped her.

Earlier in May, DPP Sharmila Sripathy-Shanaz had accused Wee of lying about his erectile dysfunction.

Wee told the police in January 2016 that he did not have the medical condition, but testified in court on May 10 this year that he had erectile dysfunction, and would "take some time to achieve an erection".

In July, his wife of 40 years testified that he could not have raped his patient as he was unable to achieve and sustain an erection, having suffered from erectile problems since 2014.

The DPP at the July hearing accused the wife of lying about Wee's ability to achieve an erection and that he had to use his hands to guide sexual penetration, adding that she had made up her account as her husband was accused of raping the patient while his hands were on the patient's legs. The wife, Madam Quek Bee Nar, disagreed.

The issue of whether Wee could carry out sexual penetration was taken up by his lawyer Edmond Pereira in court on Thursday.

Mr Pereira showed Dr Lim a sketch of the bed at Wee's clinic where the alleged crime took place, and asked the urologist if Wee could carry out sexual penetration given his difficulty in getting an erection.

Dr Lim said it was possible if Wee had a "fully erect penis, or used one hand to support his limp penis".

The defence then sought to ask Dr Lim more questions based on the sketch of the bed, but the prosecution objected, saying the questioning was speculative, which Justice Chua agreed.

The trial continues on Friday, with Dr Narayanan taking the witness stand.
 
Top