What is so Special about this 17-Year-Old Whore?

actually its true, its not interesting anymore. rich man, young man, poor man. the variety is quite complete. unless of course, there is a lady ... :D
 
Actually, if all including the girl say they only chit chat or massage and no sex involve, then no case already right? Nobody can proof what happen in the room.
 
Actually, if all including the girl say they only chit chat or massage and no sex involve, then no case already right? Nobody can proof what happen in the room.

The OKT and gal must have already implicated all their clients. On the part of the clients, some PGed, others denied either being there or sex took place. Court trials will keep this forum busy.
 
The OKT and gal must have already implicated all their clients. On the part of the clients, some PGed, others denied either being there or sex took place. Court trials will keep this forum busy.

What is "PGed"? Censored? :o

Yah but it's still words against words mah. The gal got so many customers, how can she remember which one got sex? Even if she say all customers got sio gan, why must we or the judge believe her? Nobody can proof that sex actually took place mah. Unless they have evidence of used condoms with sperm dna test. All they have, I assumed, should be only evidence of hotel booking and sms records. So how does this work? Even if they cannot proof that sex took place, the judge can still say the guys are guilty?

I appreciate that this piece of law is to protect the innocent young girls, but seeing all these guys put to shame in public really pity them. They are probably ok guys in their normal life.
 
Oh so sorry...
Is the crime "Paying for sex with underage gal" or "Having sex with underage gal"? :*::o
 
What is "PGed"? Censored? :o

Yah but it's still words against words mah. The gal got so many customers, how can she remember which one got sex? Even if she say all customers got sio gan, why must we or the judge believe her? Nobody can proof that sex actually took place mah. Unless they have evidence of used condoms with sperm dna test. All they have, I assumed, should be only evidence of hotel booking and sms records. So how does this work? Even if they cannot proof that sex took place, the judge can still say the guys are guilty?

I appreciate that this piece of law is to protect the innocent young girls, but seeing all these guys put to shame in public really pity them. They are probably ok guys in their normal life.

PG means plead guilty. Used to refer to confessions in police statements.

I agree with your points stated. If I happened to be one of the accused, I will deny the screw took place.

I am also puzzled why they went this far. This gal and her OKT should be charged for cheating the victims. I am sure they are ok guys in their normal life. Anyone whose dick could mari-kita could have been the victims, me included.
 
presssomemore said:
Yah lor. Why god gave us extra head while the women got wings? :D

And God likes wings better than heads. That is why only men get to be charged.
 
Back
Top