1: You are wrong here. The US intelligence agencies like the CIA is well known for sabotaging the govts of other countries. It has managed to destablize latin american countries so that none of them are of any threat to the US. In any case you yourself admitted it's the aggressor in the middle east. That alone is enough cause to show that the US Is aggressively attacking other countries. Look at the way you write with the exception of the middle east like somehow excusing the US for attacking the middle eastern countries. Were china to attack any middle eastern country just 1 you would be blasting china to hell. Honestly just from pt 1 alone it shows how bias you are. With the exception of the middle east indeed.
Oh yes the US needs to attack every country in every region before you will admit it has aggressive policies.
Ah Tiong cock sucker is back again!!!
So if the US intelligence agencies are so good at sabotaging other govts, tell me why they have not managed to undermine the Chinese govt? If the US intelligence agencies are that aggressive, how did they manage to let China grow so much power that it is holding America's balls in their hands (economically speaking)? Attacking Middle East for oil is a perfectly rational choice for any growing country with power. US chooses to use military action, China prefers to use back-handed energy deals (after seeing how military action can backfire on your PR image, they learned from US mistakes). Does that makes China better than US? No, it just makes China smarter than US (in retrospect). Both actions are in the self-interest of each nation. AND again your are missing the point, with the exception of the middle east, has the US taken any serious military action against other countries in recent history? NO... so your BS claim that US is always the aggressor is bullshit. US don't fight wars for fun, they fight wars for tangible reasons that will (in theory) benefit their people. And if China had not engage in economic warfare against the US, America would have no reason to be enemies with China. SO back to my point again in US vs China, it was China to fired the first shot.
2. This is BS. The fact of the matter is both countries have their faults. No country is the lesser of the other. Mind you china has not reach super power status and have the reach the US has. The day china has that can this be judged in a more objective manner.
That's your fucking prerogative, you can believe whatever you like. But given the no. of countries in Asia that align themselves more with the US:Japan, S.Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Singapore(?), it says a lot of who the lesser of two evils is.
3. China has a uniform racial composition cos it is china.
Mind you the EU is opening it's doors to immigrants from all over the world and creating problems there but let's leave that aside. China has foreigners like africans and people the world over. There's nothing wrong in having a uniform racial composition. Korea has many koreans, japan japanese, thailand thais and russia russians. You don't have a right to talk shit about racial composition and judge a country as being racist due to that factor. Remember your last post to me where you said the diversity in china doesn't matter cos the minorities in china all look chinese and therefore that isn't true racial diversity and you wrote it in a very vague manner cos you wanted to hide how ridiculous that sounds.
You are a FUCKING RETARD because you still cannot understand that it is BOTH racial composition AND the type of government/society that tells whether or not a country is racist or not. Korean and Japanese have a democratic governments (relatively speaking), and it means that minorities have voice. China is a facist govt, and is ruled by the Chinese majority, and they preach anti-US (or more generally anti-non-Chinese) propaganda to their entire population. So yes, China is made up of a bunch of Chinese racists.
The US doesn't attack the EU cos the EU is an ally. The UK is the closest ally of the US for obvious reasons both are anglo speaking countries not because the EU is more morally upright you dumbass. Your reasonings are really retarded.
Why is the EU an ally? Because they are a honorable civilization that respect others. Not because they speaking English you dumb fuck.
4. You see how dumb your reasoning is here. Ok the US is busy bullying the cave dwellers in the middle east as you put it now isn't that aggresive action? Suffice to say the US is actually very aggressive in putting in place policies that benefits only it and its allies. What you are saying is that were it not for the middle east that it's caught up in the US would have more resources to concentrate on china. Look at it from this angle. Suppose i say were it not for the middle east china would have concentrated more on the US this alone shows how aggressive china is but somehow cos it's the US perfectly fine for them to be aggressive to the middle east. Btw don't come and discuss issues like the islands to me. ok the islands don't belong to china so do they belong to either japan or the philippines? Mind you each country wants those islands for themselves. If china was doing what germany did during ww2 lands belonging to neighbouring countries would have been attacked which were not. Btw china did not even actively attack and occupy the islands. They only protested it that's it how is that comparable to germany in ww2?
You keep bringing in your red herring argument when we are talking about US vs China NOT US vs Middle East. And so I will not entertain your irrelevant arguments that has no relevance to US vs China. The only difference between Germany in the first days of WW2 is that they invaded Poland. Right now China is thinking of invading Japan/Philippines (whoever that controls the so called disputed islands). You want to dispute on the technicality that China has not invaded anyone at this time, fine I let you win. I will bet with you that China will take military action to secure those territories some time in the future.
You are definitely wrong on all counts just admit your biasness and that's fine.
Look at this sentence here. I'm sorry, but your argument that US is an aggressive bully does not hold in context against China. Against the middle east countries I can at least concede on that ground, but against China? FUCK NO
US is well known for being an aggressive bully towards other nations but other nations don't have the right to take offence first cos a good offense is actually the best form of defense. That's your reasoning which shows what a US dog you are. Also china has not actually made any offense against the US only increased it's defense against a big bully.
US has NEVER taken aggressive postures against China until VERY recently, so your good offense is the best defense is BS excuse, because US was NEVER threat to China to begin with. In fact looking at recent history, when US is so busy bombing cave dwellers in the Middle East, there is no reason that China should worry about US coming after them, as long as they trade fairly with the US (i.e. behave like EU). And btw China's increased military spending developing anti-US technologies IS AN AGGRESSIVE move against the US. America has to counter them with an appropriate response.
I see the country that caused so much chaos to so many asian countries during ww2 should be allowed to rise again cos as you know it's probably better to be being a jap vassal state and mind you when china actually makes another country a chinese vassal state then you come in to say other countries become vassal states of china. As of now not even 1 country is a vassal state of china and you can create this imaginary scenerio.
Then again from the look of things you would even be a slave of any other country just as long as you aren't the slave of china sounds really stupid to me.
As I said, I don't give a fuck about what Japan did in WW2 that is ancient history. I give a fuck about what Japan/China do today. N.Korea is a China vassal state btw. And if not for US backing, I'm sure Japan and S.Korea would fall under China's influence as well, particularly for Japan because their constitution limits their military capability. And you conveniently forget that China military build up is not for fun. Sooner or latter, China will flex her military muscles and start projecting her power/influence to SE Asia, making the countries in that region vassal states of the China hegemony. FYI, some countries in SE Asia like Thailand, Philippines, even as far as Australia and hopefully Singapore (although the PAP always behaves like a two-timing China+US cocksucker, so who knows how this will turn up) have already chosen to side with US or asked for US intervention. This is very indicative of their fear that if China is left unchecked, they will become vassal states of China. If China is really so much better than US (since US is the evil aggressor who will bully anyone for no rhyme and reason - as you have suggested), why the fuck is almost every country around China asking US for help/intervention? According to your dumb fuck logic, they should all welcome China's rise right, and use the opportunity to give a big middle finger to America right? The only problem is THAT'S NOT HAPPENING, and that says something about your dumb fuck arguments.
