- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,668
- Points
- 63
雷声大,雨点小. What an anti-climax. Machiam like shouting loudly to give way while rushing to the toilet, and only to hear all the fart with no shit coming out.![]()
Suitably nominated as the best quote of the day.
雷声大,雨点小. What an anti-climax. Machiam like shouting loudly to give way while rushing to the toilet, and only to hear all the fart with no shit coming out.![]()
"He said that his joke about the Nigerian scam was taken out of context when he was responding to the Workers' Party's Chen Show Mao's views on investments in social capital."
If this statement from ST is false, you need to take ST to task, legally if necessary.
If not, get out of the Parliament, period! We do not need parliament jesters on expensive salaries funded by even the poor taxpayers of Singapore and get kicked in the groin. GET OUT!
Post-GE2011, Singaporeans have to learn how to handle and exploit this political awakening and breakthru. One of the things the electorate needs to catch up with is what is libel, slander, defamation, what is defensible and what is not. If we do not, then we either buckle too early when we do not need to as the law is on our side and we have a fair chance of winning, or we fight on needlessly when the tide is against us.
Vikram case vs TOC e.g. is fair to take him on. TRE case vs. Lee and HC is not.
Of cos, even if the case is with us, many of us would not want to waste our time in court and we wld prefer to settle when we need not. Bros who are familiar in this field should step up and help us with advice.
Since VN doesn't want to play with TOC anymore, let's ask him to represent KS to sue UY for calling KS an adulterer.



One thing about lawyers. They try to write something so intimidating that people give up at the first sight of reading the documents. Going to court is expensive and not productive towards the desired win result, especially when it is a non-political driven case, even in Singapore. However, to a harlem or season PRC roughneck, they will just laugh it off and be waiting for anyone coming with brass knuckles.
This snake got no balls... Dare to Yaya so much but when given the opportunity to state his point, he declined the offer like a pussy... Typical PAP scums.. When cornered like a rat, these Scums will resort to threats and intimidation to defeat their critics..
Please make up your mind whether it's a pussy or rat.
雷声大,雨点小. What an anti-climax. Machiam like shouting loudly to give way while rushing to the toilet, and only to hear all the fart with no shit coming out.![]()
They are usually more harmful coz no warning given when they are about to strike.
Thank God I spend a lot of my time overseas for the past 5 years. Time to do other things. There will be a few big things happening in Singapore soon, besides the PAP charades. Maybe when I have time, I take a look at these issues again. Then more Singaporeans will realize how much they have been shortchanged. Some are still in denial though they can see better in the last 3 years. PAP is still in denial but they are not importantHe doesn't realise that the ministers are the ones usually suing and they go for opposition politicians. Bicker Nair wants to break the record by being a backbencher suing a blog. As I said he has raised Lee Kuan Yew's bar. Let him.
Vakuum Lair:
"My main quarrel was with the loud claims for spending in many areas without any detail on the trade-offs that were to be made in order to spend more in all these areas identified. Mr Chen simply said they were investments and would be ‘self-funding’,” he wrote in his latest entry on his Facebook."
He also attacked the Workers Party for measuring ‘success’ on the basis of the spending itself rather than the outcomes:
“My concern was that the Worker’s Party were contemplating changes of substantial magnitude in government spending and seemed to measure success on the basis of the spending itself rather than the outcomes achieved. When proposing such substantial changes, I think it becomes necessary to discuss revenue implications as every MP must be sure they can justify the additional burden this spending may incur to their residents.”
kingrant said:The retard is simply too daft to grasp the profoundness of Chen's arguments. He shld go ask his masters why must the govy spend $1.1 billion of people's money on buying buses instead of asking bus operators to pay their way? Has the govt promised increased revenues as a result? They havent even promised better service quality. His is the typical brain washed idiots who have been drinking shit water too long.