Funny how a culture that wants to claim whole stretches of water still cannot learn to wash shit off their butt with it.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
[Video] - "5 times Israel offered the Palestinians their own state, but were all rejected by Palestinians themselves"
- Thread starter UltimaOnline
- Start date
Bro, must be inclusive..dun lost your cool
Mudd does wash shit off their butt...tiagong they dun use toilet paper, is it?
Sure we did. We were weak surrounded by two hostile moslem countries. What else do you expect?
Actually, muud moslems also didn't agree with their founding Constitution. They revised their constitution several times to give muuds more racial and religious benefits.
Don't agree with me, you can fuck off back to some random indon island where your ancestors and sultanates came from.
Palestinians want their entre seized land back. It was suppose to be a secular Palestinian state.
Rubbish propaganda. I come to your house, fuck your wife and daughter, then say you have a right to a home, but inside your toilet only. Nonsense.
The creation of Israel state is clearly the typical Anglo strategy of creating instability in a region rich with oil to hijack the region.
The Anglos could have force the Jews to create their own state in largely empty lands in Canada, Australia or even USA, why go squeeze into a heavily contested and populated lands in the middle east?
Not a supporter of ROPs but don't give a fuck who kills who over there.
The creation of Israel state is clearly the typical Anglo strategy of creating instability in a region rich with oil to hijack the region.
The Anglos could have force the Jews to create their own state in largely empty lands in Canada, Australia or even USA, why go squeeze into a heavily contested and populated lands in the middle east?
Not a supporter of ROPs but don't give a fuck who kills who over there.
Yeah...supposed suppose
Indeed. Brits and banzai army should have asked sinkies to fuck off to tekong Sinkies are becoming tard west
Deal you go back, I go back. Mine is just nearby.
Like how Singapore transformed from a fishing village to metropolis under PAP?
Exactly, ask these pro Palestine to show a single archaeological artifact that the land belongs to Palestine.
While there countless archaeological evidence and books on Jews and Land of Israel
Bloc
The current Jewish population in Israel are Askenazi Jews from Europe. The semites are already in Palestine as Palestinians.
That was the jewish share when British split British Mandate Palestine into Arab TransJordan (today's Jordan) and Jewish Palestine (today's Israel +wb+Gaza.)
The arab aka Palestinian we known today already got their state which is Jordan. They should be heading to Jordan much like how Muslims and hindoos fled across the border after British split British India into Muslim Pakistan and hindoo India.
The type of argument stating Palestinian only got 22% while Jews take the rest is fundamentally flaw.
Arab gotten a large chunk of British Mandate in actual fact.
Last edited:
no. It supposed to be a Jewish land. Palestinian already gotten their land in Jordan. There is already a 2 state solution. Jordan and Israel
That partition was not agreed by those who live there. O
Before the Europeans arrive, Palestine population consist of 10% jews. No fighting. No killing. All peaceful living coexisting.
Then British purposely split Arab land without Arab knowledge. Until today, no peace achieved. It was designed to fail.
That a spurious argument. When British partition British India, was any consensus sought? Same case for Malaya when British decided to grant Malaya independence but not sinkie land. That the way things were being done then.
Whatever it is, muslim already got majority shares of the land and still want to play victim.
I'm from Singapore. Born and bred here. Take whatever racist ideology you have and shove it up your own ass.
Was there a need to sought the agreement of the arab settlers? Something special about them that the British need their agreement?
Similar threads
