• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

'Unfair' to apply poly fee hikes only to new intake: Iswaran

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...ly-poly-fee-hikes-only-to-new-intake--Iswaran

'Unfair' to apply poly fee hikes only to new intake: Iswaran

showimageCC.aspx
by Ong Dai Lin 06:05 AM Feb 15, 2011

Ong Dai Lin

[email protected]



SINGAPORE - Senior Minister of State (Education) S Iswaran said yesterday it would be unfair for the latest fee increases in polytechnics to be applied only to the new intake and that these fee hikes have been applied across the board traditionally.

Member of Parliament Josephine Teo (Bishan-Toa Payoh) had asked if the polytechnics could follow the universities' practice of applying fee increases to new cohorts. Such a move would assure parents whose children are already enrolled in polytechnics, she said.

In reply, Mr Iswaran said there was a "magnitude of difference" between polytechnic and university school fees, with the latter at least thrice of the former.

If a polytechnic student has difficulties because of the fee increase, which Mr Iswaran described as marginal, help will be provided, he reiterated.

He said polytechnic fees had remained constant between 2007 and 2009, which was due to the Goods and Services Tax increase and then the economic downturn. The fees were increased last year and this year, by $50 each time.

Mr Iswaran said the latest hike was necessary to meet rising costs and to allow polytechnics to continue investing in capability-building initiatives in order to deliver high-quality education.

"Where justified, it's preferable to have regular but small fee increases rather than a significant hike in any one year," he said and added the government continues to subsidise about 86 per cent of the cost of polytechnic education.

When asked if the fee hikes could have been delayed, Mr Iswaran said it could have been done on principle, but a balance also needed to be struck.



This story is available only online
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Mr Iswaran,

If the school fees of uni is 3x more expensive than poly...

does the pay of uni grad 3 x more than poly grads? No right?
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...ly-poly-fee-hikes-only-to-new-intake--Iswaran

'Unfair' to apply poly fee hikes only to new intake: Iswaran

showimageCC.aspx
by Ong Dai Lin 06:05 AM Feb 15, 2011

Ong Dai Lin

[email protected]



SINGAPORE - Senior Minister of State (Education) S Iswaran said yesterday it would be unfair for the latest fee increases in polytechnics to be applied only to the new intake and that these fee hikes have been applied across the board traditionally.

Member of Parliament Josephine Teo (Bishan-Toa Payoh) had asked if the polytechnics could follow the universities' practice of applying fee increases to new cohorts. Such a move would assure parents whose children are already enrolled in polytechnics, she said.

In reply, Mr Iswaran said there was a "magnitude of difference" between polytechnic and university school fees, with the latter at least thrice of the former.

If a polytechnic student has difficulties because of the fee increase, which Mr Iswaran described as marginal, help will be provided, he reiterated.

He said polytechnic fees had remained constant between 2007 and 2009, which was due to the Goods and Services Tax increase and then the economic downturn. The fees were increased last year and this year, by $50 each time.

Mr Iswaran said the latest hike was necessary to meet rising costs and to allow polytechnics to continue investing in capability-building initiatives in order to deliver high-quality education.

"Where justified, it's preferable to have regular but small fee increases rather than a significant hike in any one year," he said and added the government continues to subsidise about 86 per cent of the cost of polytechnic education.

When asked if the fee hikes could have been delayed, Mr Iswaran said it could have been done on principle, but a balance also needed to be struck.



This story is available only online

this cocksucker Iswaran, carry Ho Jinx balls until lose $4 billion to Thaksin, now come and spew his bullshit on this matter. Talk like damn big the govt. is subsidizing 86% of poly education. Cheebye, is it not the govt.'s job to educate the people? Is that not what our taxes pay for? They should be footing 100% of the bill, not just 86%. If they don't like it and talk like they doing a big favour to us, than get out of education. Let private schools set up unis, and Polys. See whether they got balls to do it or not. He says teh higher fees are needed to enable the polys to invest in capabilities. WTF! As the owners of the various polys, is it not the govt.'s job to give them miney to invest? What a fucktard this kekling is.
 

vamjok

Alfrescian
Loyal
this cocksucker Iswaran, carry Ho Jinx balls until lose $4 billion to Thaksin, now come and spew his bullshit on this matter. Talk like damn big the govt. is subsidizing 86% of poly education. Cheebye, is it not the govt.'s job to educate the people? Is that not what our taxes pay for? They should be footing 100% of the bill, not just 86%. If they don't like it and talk like they doing a big favour to us, than get out of education. Let private schools set up unis, and Polys. See whether they got balls to do it or not. He says teh higher fees are needed to enable the polys to invest in capabilities. WTF! As the owners of the various polys, is it not the govt.'s job to give them miney to invest? What a fucktard this kekling is.

they are totally clueless how germany is able to rebuild itself so fast after losing 2 war world.

main reason - FREE EDUCATION. up to university level. i think its no longer free, but its still peanuts (not pap peanuts) compared to ours
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
they are totally clueless how germany is able to rebuild itself so fast after losing 2 war world.

main reason - FREE EDUCATION. up to university level. i think its no longer free, but its still peanuts (not pap peanuts) compared to ours

Not only free education, but also plentiful spots in the many unis. Asian tiger economies like South Korea, taiwan, have up to 25% of their primary 1 students end up going to uni. Singapore is 5%, due to the govt.'s one uni (NUS) policy for decades. That is why these countries can produce thousands of engineers and hence we have Acer, Samsung, etc. These countries do not have a second language requirement that denied entry to uni for many otherwise bright singaporeans. Yes, the govt. and specifically the PAP and Old Goat are clueless.
 
Top