- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 82,417
- Points
- 113
Why not make it full 2 hr with chio bu? With sashimi all over her body?quickie with chiobu colleague first for 1st hr followed by makan for 2nd hr. other way around man may puke lunch over woman.
Call the union about this mistreatment.I dream of a 2-hour lunch, or at least a one-hour
Actually it's the failure of supervisors, managers and managements.Why? It's a terrible culture to bring here especially for blue collar workers. They don't know how to draw the line & had been taking advantage sleeping pass the stipulated lunch hour when the bell rings.
Normal sinkie or jhk workers will get ready 5 mins before the bell rings but not the ATs.
Japanese and Koreans are a different breed. I dunno about Taiwanese.Once I went for an interview at a Japanese company. Was briefed by hr person their lunch was only 45 minutes. I thought Wtf?
The labour Agents can only bring those rejects in their own country in & even encourages job hopping for their commission. SME has no long list of good workers to choose competing even with GLCs.Actually it's the failure of supervisors, managers and managements.
They fail to recruit the right people with the right (moral) values, fail to communicate expectations clearly, fail to motivate, monitor, guide behaviours at the workplace.
And finally, fail to set the best examplary culture and self to the people under them. Fish rots from the top.
I believe Hong Kong top executives also have this privilege. Especially in finance and law.If you are in senior management, 2-hour lunches are the norm. WFH up to 3 days per week, and coming in late as well as leaving office early are pretty common practices.
Can't possibly be 100% is bad. There must be some gems in those that is available. It's the failure of managers to perform their selection duties.The labour Agents can only bring those rejects in their own country in & even encourages job hopping for their commission. SME has no long list of good workers to choose competing even with GLCs.
Now most are bad. The earlier batches are better just like domestic maids. It gets worse when the better ones retired & new ones networked to learn how to blackmail employers but do less work.Can't possibly be 100% is bad. There must be some gems in those that is available. It's the failure of managers to perform their selection duties.