- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,138
- Points
- 113
Is he a regular or NSF liability soldiers... what rank?
The 3 judges... Did they do NSF liability terms?
CD was an officer in the Air Defence.
Is he a regular or NSF liability soldiers... what rank?
The 3 judges... Did they do NSF liability terms?
CD stands for?CD was an officer in the Air Defence.
CD stands for?
Of course there is intention to suppress the breach by de souza and his three legal assistants.But they have decided to let off him this time : no stern warning,no fine and not even a slap on the wrist.I found the arguments of Mr Assomull, who is the less illustrious lawyer of the two sides and representing Law Society, very persuasive. According to the 3 wise men, it all boils down to intention, specifically whether or not DS had the intention to suppress the breach (of undertaking) by his clients:
View attachment 186868
Now listen to Mr Assomull:
View attachment 186869
Let's not forget the affidavit of the clients was drafted by a team of 4 lawyers, and even DS admitted that the affidavit was not clear enough to inform the Court that there was a breach of undertaking by his clients. Did the Court agree with Mr Assomull that DS and his team should have discharged themselves if the clients did NOT agree to the lawyers' advice on how the affidavit should be drafted to make it clear to the Court that there was a breach of undertaking?
View attachment 186871
Rest assured it will never happen to Pritam.Wonder if Pritam did the same thing what is verdict?
PAP appointed.The court judges are not PAP members.
It's a slap on the wrist of DS, but a kick on Law Society's face.Of course there is intention to suppress the breach by de souza and his three legal assistants.But they have decided to let off him this time : no stern warning,no fine and not even a slap on the wrist.![]()
PAP appointed.