• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Trinity Judges Find Good MP de Souza Innocent As White As Snow!

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
I found the arguments of Mr Assomull, who is the less illustrious lawyer of the two sides and representing Law Society, very persuasive. According to the 3 wise men, it all boils down to intention, specifically whether or not DS had the intention to suppress the breach (of undertaking) by his clients:

View attachment 186868

Now listen to Mr Assomull:



View attachment 186869

Let's not forget the affidavit of the clients was drafted by a team of 4 lawyers, and even DS admitted that the affidavit was not clear enough to inform the Court that there was a breach of undertaking by his clients. Did the Court agree with Mr Assomull that DS and his team should have discharged themselves if the clients did NOT agree to the lawyers' advice on how the affidavit should be drafted to make it clear to the Court that there was a breach of undertaking?

View attachment 186871
Of course there is intention to suppress the breach by de souza and his three legal assistants.But they have decided to let off him this time : no stern warning,no fine and not even a slap on the wrist.:biggrin:
 

ODACHEK

Alfrescian
Loyal
giphy.gif

giphy.gif
 

LexLuthor

Alfrescian
Loyal
Of course there is intention to suppress the breach by de souza and his three legal assistants.But they have decided to let off him this time : no stern warning,no fine and not even a slap on the wrist.:biggrin:
It's a slap on the wrist of DS, but a kick on Law Society's face. :rolleyes:
 
Top