- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 5,769
- Points
- 48
18:55 Hr news from Thailand: 

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2008/10/21/headlines/headlines_30086532.php
RATCHADAPISEK LAND SCANDAL
Thaksin found guilty and sentenced to two years in jail
By The Nation
The Supreme Court on Tuesday sentenced ousted prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra to two years in jail for abusing power to facilitate a deal for his wife; Khunying Pojamarn, to buy a Bangkok land plot worth t772 million from the state.
However the Supreme Court on Holders of Political Office found Pojamarn not guilty and revoked an arrest warrant on her of this trial.
Thaksin was found guilty of violating articles 4, 100 and 122 of the National Counter Corruption Commission law which bar holders of public office and their spouses from entering into a contract with the state.
[Read comprehensive background]
The Supreme Court ruled against Thaksin after reading the verdict for about two hours.
The Supreme Court ruled 5:4 to say that former prime minister Thaksin knew about his wife's purchasing of land from the Financial Institutions Development Fund.
With that knowledge, the court ruled Thaksin also carried out actions that constituted conflict of interest on part of Thaksin as a state official.
Before reaching the verdict, the Supreme Court said the Assets Examination Committee had the power to probe the Ratchadpisek land case against Thaksin and his wife.
The court dismissed claimed by Thaksin's defence lawyers that the AEC had no authority to probe case the because the AEC was not investigators and because the Financial Institutions Development Fund had not filed complaint regarding to the land purchase.
In addition, the court ruled that the AEC was empowered by the court orders to conduct graft probe against the former prime minister so it did not have to wait for the FIDF to file complaint first.
The Supreme Court also ruled that the Financial Institutions Development Fund is a state agency so there is ground for trial in the Ratchadapisek land case against former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his wife.
The court ruled down an agreement of Thaksin's defence team that the FIDF is not under state administration and that the Ratchadaphisek land purchase did not fall under Article 100 (3) of the National Counter Corruption Act, which covers state agencies.
Since the court ruled that the FIDF is state agency, the land purchase fell under the anti-graft act.
<!--
--> <!-- Google Dtail Ads --> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-1044823792492543"; /* Rss 336x280 */ google_ad_slot = "3078338200"; google_ad_width = 336; google_ad_height = 280; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script><script> window.google_render_ad(); </script>


http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2008/10/21/headlines/headlines_30086532.php
RATCHADAPISEK LAND SCANDAL
Thaksin found guilty and sentenced to two years in jail
By The Nation
The Supreme Court on Tuesday sentenced ousted prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra to two years in jail for abusing power to facilitate a deal for his wife; Khunying Pojamarn, to buy a Bangkok land plot worth t772 million from the state.
However the Supreme Court on Holders of Political Office found Pojamarn not guilty and revoked an arrest warrant on her of this trial.
Thaksin was found guilty of violating articles 4, 100 and 122 of the National Counter Corruption Commission law which bar holders of public office and their spouses from entering into a contract with the state.
[Read comprehensive background]
The Supreme Court ruled against Thaksin after reading the verdict for about two hours.
The Supreme Court ruled 5:4 to say that former prime minister Thaksin knew about his wife's purchasing of land from the Financial Institutions Development Fund.
With that knowledge, the court ruled Thaksin also carried out actions that constituted conflict of interest on part of Thaksin as a state official.
Before reaching the verdict, the Supreme Court said the Assets Examination Committee had the power to probe the Ratchadpisek land case against Thaksin and his wife.
The court dismissed claimed by Thaksin's defence lawyers that the AEC had no authority to probe case the because the AEC was not investigators and because the Financial Institutions Development Fund had not filed complaint regarding to the land purchase.
In addition, the court ruled that the AEC was empowered by the court orders to conduct graft probe against the former prime minister so it did not have to wait for the FIDF to file complaint first.
The Supreme Court also ruled that the Financial Institutions Development Fund is a state agency so there is ground for trial in the Ratchadapisek land case against former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his wife.
The court ruled down an agreement of Thaksin's defence team that the FIDF is not under state administration and that the Ratchadaphisek land purchase did not fall under Article 100 (3) of the National Counter Corruption Act, which covers state agencies.
Since the court ruled that the FIDF is state agency, the land purchase fell under the anti-graft act.
<!--

--> <!-- Google Dtail Ads --> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-1044823792492543"; /* Rss 336x280 */ google_ad_slot = "3078338200"; google_ad_width = 336; google_ad_height = 280; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script><script> window.google_render_ad(); </script>