This Kind of Ball Licker Also Got!

I was quite surprised myself when I saw that letter. Guess someone working at the press is going to get a phone call for that and it will certainly not be a complimentary call.Well done Albert for such writing such a "meaningful" letter that got the press to print the letter.
 
I was quite surprised myself when I saw that letter. Guess someone working at the press is going to get a phone call for that and it will certainly not be a complimentary call.Well done Albert for such writing such a "meaningful" letter that got the press to print the letter.

A few weeks ago an ang mo sent a higly sarcastic letter about a govt dept with over the board praises. It was so bad that it should have gone into the bin. This one is a classic. Deserved to be framed.

I am sure the AWARE and other Woman's right NGOs will be highly offended. I am sure there will replies to this if they allow it.
 
You'll be there to bear witness to this joyous holy matrimony, won't you?

Held last year. All this, courtesy of old SBF. I wonder if you recall when Mano Sabnani was sacked, someone from the their Editorial staff kept feeding SBF with blow by blow account and revealed what was going on.
 
She better off doing charity work and make a name of herself.

that is a good idea, she got power, she got money.

what she miss is the NOBEL peace prize.

so she better do charity work and help the people in indonesia and malaysia, vietnam and burma etc.



----

LKY will not allow her to join PAP. He damn smart one. black widow of finance.
 
that is a good idea, she got power, she got money.

what she miss is the NOBEL peace prize.

so she better do charity work and help the people in indonesia and malaysia, vietnam and burma etc.



----

LKY will not allow her to join PAP. He damn smart one. black widow of finance.

The biggest charitable act she could do is to leave our CPF money alone.
 
cannot tell if writer is super ball-licker or super sarcastic
 


I do see where you are coming from.

The BIG question is why they allowed such a letter (especially the last line) to be published in the first place?

Internal party squabble? Power play? Dunno...


who knows? sometimes you might even lose count of how many who are pissed off with the PAP but are working in the senior or top positions in stat boards, ministries, and GLCs.
 
Back
Top