there is something wrong with that religion when majority of terrorists in the world are from that religion...

Sialoquent

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
21,497
Points
113
isn't it?
facts don't lie.
something seriously wrong with that religion.
 
that religion people cannot take criticism of their religion and will resort to violence, beheading, murder of others. something is seriously wrong with their believers.
 
that religion people actually no difference from the evil ccp regime in china who cannot take criticism and will resort to all means to silence critics.
 
unless and until sanity goes into the dense and thick skull of the leaders of that religion, it will always be branded as a global terrorist religion in the foreseeable future.
 
so people from that religion should do a self examination of what they want. do they want to be a terrorist religion or peaceful religion which can coexist with other religions in the world?
 
if they want to coexist with others, then stop all these jihad nonsense and others will accept them and everyone will live happily together.
 
if they can't coexist with others, then they must be eradicated as a religion of the world once and for all.
 
it cannot be there are only a few bad apples in that religion when facts and statistics show that majority of terrorism are from that religion. it is definitely more that a few bad apples. it looks like a lorry load of rotten apples to me.
 
If it about palestinians, they are fighting for a independent secular state.
don't put all the blame on palestinians. the fact is that violence and archaic practises are systemic in that religion and unless and until the majority of followers know how to live civilly with others from different religions, that religion will always be branded as a global terrorist religion.
 
don't put all the blame on palestinians. the fact is that violence and archaic practises are systemic in that religion and unless and until the majority of followers know how to live civilly with others from different religions, that religion will always be branded as a global terrorist religion.
The others in the mayhem are quarelling over which religious sect is the most proper and true. Like catholics and Protestants fighting in northern Ireland.
 
Peaceful and Holy Text: (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."
 
Peaceful and Holy Text: (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."
that is a very bad verse
 
isn't it?
facts don't lie.
something seriously wrong with that religion.
After the cartoonists from Charlie Hebdo produced drawings insulting Christians, Jews and Muslims, only followers from 1 religion murdered staff from that company. It was no surprise that the killers were Islamic terrorists. The Christians and Jews practiced immense restraint like true believers who forgive and forget.
 
Nothing wrong if you understand the underlying tenets on which the faith is predicated. The lie is with the false desire to be peaceable and peaceful. How do you forge peace when the overriding command is to use violence to conquer and take hold of what you want? Those who preach tolerance are the hypocrites. Ps: a peaceable religion will never invent words to describe non believers. No where in the Christian faith, or Buddhism or any in the world for that matter, can you find the Arabic equivalent of an infidel
 
Last edited:
After the cartoonists from Charlie Hebdo produced drawings insulting Christians, Jews and Muslims, only followers from 1 religion murdered staff from that company. It was no surprise that the killers were Islamic terrorists. The Christians and Jews practiced immense restraint like true believers who forgive and forget.
Images or caricatures of any person is forbidden for those of certain beliefs so to make one on their prophet , if you already know that it's a red line, and insist on crossing it, then you are responsible for the aftermath. Charlie Hebdo crossed that in a do or dare challenge while those in the UK and US did not out of respect.
 
Images or caricatures of any person is forbidden for those of certain beliefs so to make one on their prophet , if you already know that it's a red line, and insist on crossing it, then you are responsible for the aftermath. Charlie Hebdo crossed that in a do or dare challenge while those in the UK and US did not out of respect.
It's wrong as you say but the reaction and violence is excessive.
 
It's wrong as you say but the reaction and violence is excessive.
When it comes to religion, I normally do not cross the red line. If guy does not eat beef, I won't eat beef. Faith is irrational. We will not know what the repercussions are if you cross that red line.
 
Back
Top