• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The Truth about Masks - Debunking Unprofessional Advisories

Byebye Penis

Alfrescian
Loyal
1. Surgical masks are oversupplied for good in Asia-Pacific. Earlier, i shared many insights about N95 due to the nature of my work. Being the leader of MTI, I am shocked that his trade advisors are just desk-bounded and did not survey the market. This advisory is not accurate in any way, I wish to confirm that supply in Asia-Pacific is extremely strong now.

2. A pack 3-ply 50pcs surgical mask costs about $15 (online) to $28 (Petrol stations). This is back to the retail price before the outbreak in Wuhan. Each 3ply surgical mask cost 30-50 cents which is affordable for the general population.

3. Reusable masks are useful but not hygienic in anyway. Medical personnel will tell you that reusable masks are very unhealthy even if there is no exposure to pathogens. Imagine a lady wore an underwear ten times (like you trapping your mouth and nose fluids), try smelling it after washing or drying. You will know what I mean.

4. Reusable are very loose after washing 10-15 times. A good mask (cotton, 1ply, 3ply, N95) cannot be loose. Loose masks are extremely risky to people with smaller head circumferences, eg. children and SYTs.

5. Reusable masks should be considered contaminated after each use. They must be washed more thoroughly which reduces the filtration after each use. Your tees will look more transparent after ten washes.

6. Users are likely to touch all surfaces of the reusable mask throughout the day which is as good as dirtying your hands. Just imagine the contaminants from environment and user after taking a peak hour train ride. Keeping these masks in handbag after use, risks contaminating the handbag. This is called self-contamination. If you use a reusable mask, please keep it in a small plastic bag and bring home, and throw away the plastic bag everyday.




Cloth masks results in higher infection rates, and should be used only when disposable masks are not available. This is science.
 

Byebye Penis

Alfrescian
Loyal
Many studies warn that cloth masks are 40-80% less effective due the above reasons.
Lastly, I wish to cite the example below for using Reusable Masks vs Surgical masks (Not N95):
Reference: Mask Comparison for Respiratory Illness and Influenza Protection

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971
Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI)

The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
 

hofmann

Alfrescian
Loyal
Reuseable masks are better for the environment. It functions to keep your own germs to yourself. It's targeted to stop the spread by asymptomatic cases more than the prevention of infection from aerosolized virus particles. These masks should only be used in low risk places where crowds are thinner. When moving to high risk areas, surgical masks should be used instead.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Mask are worn by medical stuff so that they dont spread germs, bad breath during surgical procedure period.

The operation room is a small sex space JT standard. Full aircon blown during operation time circulation ventilation suck out air ....

Wear surgical mask during operation are for nurses and doktors who cannot keep their mouth shuts talking about which free patient cunts and cocks they just fucked yesterday during procedures....

Wearing mask in open sex space doesnt help much... like dog style fucking...
Tioboh hope this helps

Psst...psst...if you like my bullshit click the like button.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This minister is just trying to salvage his Sia Suay reputation after his fiasco on the same issue at the start.
He continues to talk cock. Apart from the debunked theories above, he is naive to think that it is of strategic
importance not to talk about our stock pile, as we put ourselves in a weaker position when we order masks
in future.

Day two in junior college economics class will tell you it is all about supply and demand, who is willing to
pay top dollar. Sellers don't give a shit about the buyers' stockpile. This was what happened in the US,
with the various states competed against each other, as well as the federal government, TEMA among
others.
 

birdie69

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think this part is not true.

Singaporeans should not take the availability of masks for granted, Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Thursday (May 21). Mr Chan also said that the general public should use reusable masks instead of surgical masks, which should be conserved for healthcare workers.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...not-take-availability-masks-granted-chan-chun
The way he talks like his boss, corona virus is not as deadly as Sars, no substance and yet acts like professional advisor
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
The way he talks like his boss, corona virus is not as deadly as Sars, no substance and yet acts like professional advisor

It is absolutely true that Covid-19 is not as deadly as SARS.

SARS infected 238 people and it killed 33 of them. That's a case mortality rate of 33/238 x 100% = 13.9%

Covid-19 on the other hand has a case mortality rate of 23/29812 x 100% = 0.077%

From these figures you can easily work out that SARS was 13.9/0.077 = 180 times more deadly than Covid-19.
 

Byebye Penis

Alfrescian
Loyal
The way he talks like his boss, corona virus is not as deadly as Sars, no substance and yet acts like professional advisor

Why she never listen to Mr Chan?

4c0905ce-9aa0-11ea-96ff-7aff439fc3be_image_hires_040419.jpeg
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Ministry of Trade and Industry, Mr Chan said, looks at Singapore’s supply line “every day to see what are the potential demand and supply issues that we have to contend with two to three months out”.

There is this thing called modelling/forecasting - this should not be a very difficult problem with the big and small data
we have.


Mr Chan also said that the general public should use reusable masks instead of surgical masks, which should be conserved for healthcare workers.

This guy is not aware that 70% of the population cannot afford to change their disposable masks even every two days. He thinks we are dumb, not to use
the reusable masks. How out of touch!


Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...not-take-availability-masks-granted-chan-chun
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Reuseable masks are better for the environment. It functions to keep your own germs to yourself. It's targeted to stop the spread by asymptomatic cases more than the prevention of infection from aerosolized virus particles. These masks should only be used in low risk places where crowds are thinner. When moving to high risk areas, surgical masks should be used instead.
yes, and i sanitize my reusable cloth mask by flipping it inside out under the noon sun and let it flutter in the wind. after 69 minutes of sun bleach, it smells great and fresh again. the sun with its ultraviolet rays is a free sanitizer.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Not enough masks just say not enough masks lah. Die die want to brag/hint/insinuate that the PAP govt is super competent, all supplies are adequate etc. :rolleyes:

Fucked up overpaid storeman Chan Chun Sing. :poop:
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It is absolutely true that Covid-19 is not as deadly as SARS.

SARS infected 238 people and it killed 33 of them. That's a case mortality rate of 33/238 x 100% = 13.9%

Covid-19 on the other hand has a case mortality rate of 23/29812 x 100% = 0.077%

From these figures you can easily work out that SARS was 13.9/0.077 = 180 times more deadly than Covid-19.

Covid-19 spreads easily. More infected, more deaths. SARS got kill 300,ooo or not? No.

More deaths from covid-19. More infected. Rest your case lah. Covid-19 is a bigger threat than SARS.
 

hofmann

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is absolutely true that Covid-19 is not as deadly as SARS.

SARS infected 238 people and it killed 33 of them. That's a case mortality rate of 33/238 x 100% = 13.9%

Covid-19 on the other hand has a case mortality rate of 23/29812 x 100% = 0.077%

From these figures you can easily work out that SARS was 13.9/0.077 = 180 times more deadly than Covid-19.

I think the problem with covid, is that while less deadly than Sars, the rate of infection is much higher. So the gross no. of deaths could be much higher than SARS if allowed to spread too much.

Let's say 13.9% of 100,000 infections vs 0.077% of 180,000,000 is around parity.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
I think the problem with covid, is that while less deadly than Sars, the rate of infection is much higher. So the gross no. of deaths could be much higher than SARS if allowed to spread too much.

Let's say 13.9% of 100,000 infections vs 0.077% of 180,000,000 is around parity.

Yes the total number of deaths would be higher but no worse than the number of deaths from influenza. We don't lockdown a nation because of influenza so why do we do so for Covid-19.
 
Top