S'poreans kena squeezed, give up liao, accept mediocrity as normal

Romagnum

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
900
Points
0
http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC120317-0000066/Resilience-or-resignation?

Resilience or resignation?

Observers praise calm reaction to latest MRT disruption but some warn against accepting breakdowns as normal

by Tan Weizhen 04:45 AM Mar 17, 2012

SINGAPORE - In contrast to the events three months earlier, commuters' calm - and almost nonchalant - reactions to Thursday's massive disruption on the busiest stretch of SBS Transit's North East Line (NEL) have led some observers to laud the population's resilience in a crisis.

Others, however, warned of the pitfalls should Singaporeans come to accept less-than-perfect standards, in a country that prides itself on running like clockwork.

The train service breakdowns on Dec 15 and Dec 17 sparked widespread public dissatisfaction, with commuters then taking SMRT to task for the disruptions on the North South Line.

On Thursday, thanks to improved crisis management based on lessons learnt from the earlier incidents, the affected commuters, while frustrated, generally took the disruption in their stride.

Yesterday, some commuters turned up earlier than usual at the NEL stations - in case the trains broke down again.

In fact, as some affected commuters pointed out, it is no longer rare for the MRT trains to be hit by disruptions - just like in places such as London and New York.

Pioneer Member of Parliament Cedric Foo, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for transport, pointed out that a resilient population "is more capable of responding to crises, because we don't know what will happen to us in future". "Having said that, people should not become immune to such (incidents) as well," he said.

Joo Chiat MP Charles Chong added: "Although in some other countries, people think it is normal to experience train disruptions, Singaporeans should maintain high standards and expectations."

Transport experts stressed there is no reason - given the age of the MRT system here, as compared to those in other countries - for Singaporeans to accept train service disruptions as part and parcel of life. National University of Singapore professor Lee Der Horng said: "If the public is getting used to (such incidents), I don't think it is a good sign. The systems are supposed to be good and reliable, so we should instead look into the problem."



Give commuters more alternatives

With efforts underway to enhance the public transport system, the experts called for other additional measures such as a systematic review of the entire train system and direct bus routes from the outskirts to the city centre to give commuters more options apart from taking the MRT.

"In the past, there could be some room for error. But now that the population has grown, and the system is running at capacity, minor problems can trigger something big," said Singapore Management University assistant professor Terence Fan.

Both Prof Lee and Asst Prof Fan were in favour of bringing back bus services that plied the same route as the trains - with Prof Lee noting that "some redundancy ... is necessary".

Asst Prof Fan also called for greater competition in the public transport sector - every route should be opened up for bidding once every five to 10 years, he said.

Prof Lee also suggested benchmarking of reliability standards - measured by the number of disruptions and safety infringements - against other places with similar urbanised systems, such as Hong Kong. He added: "If we are not doing as well as others, then we will need to find out why."

Staggered work hours, flexible work arrangements, and relocating offices away from the city centre would also ease the load on the MRT system during peak hours, the experts added.

To restore public confidence in the train network, operators have to step up maintence, the observers said.

And this makes it all the more important that people with experience in the rail industry to helm the train services, Mr Chong said. Otherwise, the CEO, for instance, would not be in a position to improve maintenance checks, said Mr Chong, who pointed out that the overnight period - when trains are not running - is insufficient to conduct detailed checks on the entire MRT network.

SMRT is currently looking for a new CEO, after Ms Saw Phaik Hwa stepped down in January in the aftermath of the Dec disruptions. Ms Saw's previous experience was in the retail industry.

SBS Transit CEO Gan Juay Kiat previously held senior appointments in the Singapore Armed Forces. He also had various stints in sectors such as property and publishing.
 
Is there no COO and CTO? CEO in most companies in the world are the frauds that get away with lots of money screwing things up. Go look at investment banks and other large firms.
 
It's like killing someone as a hired assassin. The first time it is a mental and emotional torture, but after a few more kill jobs you get desensitized to the ordeal.

Anyway, what can Sinkies possibly do? They can't boycott public transport, they depend on it for their daily commute.

I think the problem with the MRT system, besides being overloaded by an increased population and maybe cutting corners on maintenance work, is also caused by an over-reliance on automation. Driverless trains may sound impressive, but when there's a malfunction in the electronic system, you're more or less screwed.
 
It's not a coincidence all these things happening now

In the past many of the MRT top management were from Army log division, many engineers also home trained from army OETI and Transport

Now with rampant cost cutting they are using many foreigners, some from Philippines, whose work attitude can be quite relaxed,

Pinoys are very good for entertainment and service industries - it is in their blood

But for the serious infrastructure and engineering stuff, I just find it hard to trust their attitude
 
It's like killing someone as a hired assassin. The first time it is a mental and emotional torture, but after a few more kill jobs you get desensitized to the ordeal.

.
I liken it to a prostitute taking customers for the first time
 
Pinoys are very good for entertainment and service industries - it is in their blood

But for the serious infrastructure and engineering stuff, I just find it hard to trust their attitude


Agree.. Pinoys should just stick to the entertainment industry.. Got few Pinoys working in the Marine Industry.. My boss gave then a job to do that can be completed in 4 hours.. But it took them 7 hours to rectify the problem..:eek: After weeks of showing the same fucked up attitude during work, the following month my boss told them to find another company to work..:D
 
Last edited:
Dun be so harsh on pinoys....work call centers also can.
Any job needs mouth talk alot one they can do
 
Back
Top