• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SPH CEO - Our newspapers remain the most trusted, authoriative, and effective

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
...source of news, commentaries and ANALyses.

Talking about believing one's own press release - in this case, one's own press.
Wither the 154th?

I don't know what to say.
 
why read SPH when there's Google News, TOC and TR?

even job listings for my industry have gone to Jobstreet and Jobsdb, and property listings have gone to craigslist.

SPH is more and more a property developer.
 
...source of news, commentaries and ANALyses.

Talking about believing one's own press release - in this case, one's own press.
Wither the 154th?

I don't know what to say.

can you post the full article
 
The TR and TOC is very biased and often present inaccurate info.
The recent minister pension was only posted by TR saying that it is 2/3 of last drawn pay.
This is a very serous mistake. Only found out later that it is 1/10 of last drawn pay.

SPH may be perceived as pro-gov but they are not biased to the extreme as TR & TOC and also they such mistakes.
Foreign news like CNN can take SPH news and buy it. So SPH has a reputation to uphold.
Different for TOC and TR.


why read SPH when there's Google News, TOC and TR?

even job listings for my industry have gone to Jobstreet and Jobsdb, and property listings have gone to craigslist.

SPH is more and more a property developer.
 
It's only after TR & TOC commentary that PMO & TCH addressed peasants.
 
Over the past fifty years SPH had two exPAP Ministers as Chairman,Lim Kim San and Tony Tan Singaporeans cannot expect fair and honest reporting from SPH nor from Media Corps CHannels.The whole visual and print media in the land is under the tight control of the ruling party apparatus They are all parts of the dictatorial regime.

Thanks to the INTERNET.The NET is neutral.
 
...source of news, commentaries and ANALyses.

Talking about believing one's own press release - in this case, one's own press.
Wither the 154th?

I don't know what to say.

Does a guy ever admit his own dick is small? I rest my case.
 
A prostitute lamenting how good the Braddell Whorehouse really was ? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Errh, it's a rebuttal. No credit to TR & TOC.
I can spread anything I want on internet - does that mean I get the credit if the authorities are forced to print a rebuttal in the Straits Times?

It's only after TR & TOC commentary that PMO & TCH addressed peasants.
 
TOc--Ok some sources

TR--FT bashing, poorly sourced, biased, anti-Goh Keng Swee site

The Satay Club--in between

Verdict--in academic dissertations, you have to use proper news sources.
 
Errh, it's a rebuttal. No credit to TR & TOC.
I can spread anything I want on internet - does that mean I get the credit if the authorities are forced to print a rebuttal in the Straits Times?

Fuck you lah. As far as we know, from the available information, it was 2/3 of the highest drawn salary as per legislation. Only when there was a public outcry, did they print a "clarification" that it was based on the pensionable amount. Which only amounts to 10% of the salary.

Since you are a PAP dog, please educate this forum. What is the salary? How can we confirm its only 10%? Why is it that people are drawing a pension PLUS salary in the first place? Why has this issue not been addressed previously when the ministers' pay were under review to benchmark the private sector?

What spread anything on internet? Fuck you understand. The only person spreading shit online is you.
 
Does someone have contact details of SPH management? I need to escalate this. My family, unfortunately, subscribed to TNP, and there's been issues from Day 1.

Day 1 & 2, NO DELIVERY. There has also been cases of TORN/CRUMPLED issues received. I took pictures, emailed SPH customer service. Things go smoothly for a while, and now, no delivery again. I called, complained. guess what? treat me like beggar, offer me 2 additional issues of TNP.

and on Sat morning, when papers was delivered at 5.30am, my doorbell was rung more than 10 times. Sun morning, because doorbell's battery was removed, fist was used to BANG MY DOOR at 6.30am.

i know SPH has a bad name online, but I didnt know they were capable of such HOOLIGAN/HARASSMENT ACTS.

obviously the CS manager i complained to was super incompetent to allow such things to happen
 
Fuck you lah. As far as we know, from the available information, it was 2/3 of the highest drawn salary as per legislation. Only when there was a public outcry, did they print a "clarification" that it was based on the pensionable amount. Which only amounts to 10% of the salary.

Since you are a PAP dog, please educate this forum. What is the salary? How can we confirm its only 10%? Why is it that people are drawing a pension PLUS salary in the first place? Why has this issue not been addressed previously when the ministers' pay were under review to benchmark the private sector?

What spread anything on internet? Fuck you understand. The only person spreading shit online is you.

Hi Karmabear

Happy New Year! I am on your side. But no need to get so upset with these PAP sycophants. It's not worth losing your cool over these scums of the earth. Some things are so blatantly obvious and yet they refuse to acknowledge. Really a case of "none so blind as those who would not see". Let me help you illustrate to these retards why SPH is indeed a chief prostitue of the PAP as David Marshall called them. Do you remember the "mee siam mai hum" phrase used by PM Lee in one of his National Day Rally Speech. The whole world heard it as such. You know what the Straits Times printed it as the next day? It quoted LHL as saying "mee siam mai hiam". The ST just could not wait for this chance to share how mindlessly faithful they are to the PAP by thinking they had come to the rescue of their master by changing what he actually said to save him the embarrassment. But they never never expected that PM's press secretary came out to clarify that what his boss meant to say was "laksa mai hum" instead of "mee siam mai hum". When the whole of S'pore read the press secretary's clarification, ST's credibility went down the drain immediately. Not so much for this instance but by extension. Sporeans know to what falsehood ST is willing to go in order to make what their bosses did wrong look right. And you have people here who say SPH is a fully trusted newspaper? That's why I always tell my friends and relatives, these PAP supporters want to carry balls also don't know how to carry.
 
Seriously, SPH is an insult to the integrity of the entire profession of journalism.

I do not see how any self-respecting journalist could possibly feel at ease working at SPH, given their practices and their style of doing things.

It is a complete, utter disgrace.. I wonder why people even bother reading the Straits Times?
 
Back
Top