• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SMRT road works damage property, no problem but if developer, different story

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,975
Points
83
Transmodified from hxxp://news.xin.msn.com/en/singapore/bca-to-look-into-sembawang-homes-affected-by-cracks

Peasantpore: The clueless, useless and inept fat cats at Building and Construction Authority (BCA) claimed they are looking into the concerns of some peasant residents in rural Sembawang who have suffered damage to their properties on land owned by Housing Mafia.

Minion for Kangaroo Law and Vassal Relationship, unfortunately as well as Peasants' Representative for the area 山木庚, had to dabble in retail politics, visited the pigeonholes of affected peasants along Jalan Legundi, Jalan Derum and Sembong Road on Sunday. To proved he was on the ball, his lackeys, posted photos of the damage on his Facebook page.

At least 13 peasants households have complained of cracks in their birdcages. The fat cat BCA could have told the 13 stupid peasants ask Housing Mafia for answers. It is likely Housing Mafia pushed the buck to the building contractors, claiming while Housing Mafia is the landlord, the peasant leasees problems are solely their problems, hence obeying Ruler Loong's 'peasants die, their problems' doctrine. The developer must have told the peasants to fark off citing that road works that damage other properties are usually brushed aside by the regime, hence they will use that precedent to con the peasants.

山木庚 sutbtly hinted the cracks seem to have occurred after work started on a nearby development by another greedy developer who probably hired some cheap third world engineer who proposed using silly construction techiques to create problems for nearby peasants.

山木庚 has ordered BCA fat cats to investigate the greedy developer's background lest he offends the wrong 'patron'. He hinted if the developer has no powerful backer, BCA should 'arrange' for the greedy developer to repair the homes with more serious damage first before Chinese New Year. 山木庚 also added, as he is the Kangaroo Law Minion, legal solutions are aplenty if the greedy developer has insignificant political backing but dares to play punk and denies responsibility. Wiser peasants read this subtle statement that they will lose 'superstar' status should they balk 山木庚 during 2016 Procedural Erections.

A dialogue with the developer to address means and perform the necessary wayangs to placate peasants by the next full moon while a background check is conducted.
 
Last edited:
Property damaged no problem gahmen will take action,
but wait, they will asked the Contractor to compensate the
house owner for the damged!! They point to the contractor
clauses in the contracts states that any damaged to nearby property
u are responsible!! haha!!
 
Property damaged no problem gahmen will take action,
but wait, they will asked the Contractor to compensate the
house owner for the damged!! They point to the contractor
clauses in the contracts states that any damaged to nearby property
u are responsible!! haha!!
Who did the surveying works? Did LTA and BCA ask for necessary survey works?
 
Back
Top