Singaporean mad over outdated property tax

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,746
Points
0
Why Iras should review formula for property tax

MR PAUL Chan ('Adopt fairer tax system for owner-occupiers'; Jan 23) is right in advocating a new and fairer formula for property tax.

The current method of tagging market value to rental value is grossly unfair to owner-occupiers, and my personal experience is a good example.

When we experienced the worst year of economic growth in 2009, the property tax went down by only 23.5 per cent from that in the preceding, pre-crisis year.

Yet the same tax shot up by a whopping 98 per cent last year, which meant the property tax paid in 2010 was 50 per cent higher than that in the 2008 pre-crisis year.

And the economy has not even recovered to pre-crisis levels.

There were also four adjustments made between 2007 and last year, three of which were increases and one, a decrease.

Is there a need for such frequent adjustments in tax rates?

All the above reinforces the view that when times are bad, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) returns less than it should, but when times are good, it takes back a lot more than it deserves.

The efforts by Iras to introduce adjustments and inform taxpayers could have been saved if a different formula is used.

As an owner-occupier, I do not lose or benefit from economic changes or changes in rental value, so why is my property tax not reflecting that?

Thian Tai Chew
 
IRAS is about collecting $ for the govt so good luck. End of the day it is in the govt's interest to have high property prices. :mad:
 
... As an owner-occupier, I do not lose or benefit from economic changes or changes in rental value, so why is my property tax not reflecting that?

Thian Tai Chew
ah chew ...

u r not affected by economic changes, but ah loon's salary is affected mah! ...

ah loon's salary shoots up if economy goot, n refuse 2 cum down wen economy's bad mah ...
 
There were also four adjustments made between 2007 and last year, three of which were increases and one, a decrease.

Hmnnn ... One step back and three steps forward, what dance is this??

Cha Cha wenbo? or Fox dance??
 
Idiot. You don't OWN the property. The Gahmen does. IRAS should tax the Gahmen!
 
There were also four adjustments made between 2007 and last year, three of which were increases and one, a decrease.

Hmnnn ... One step back and three steps forward, what dance is this??

Cha Cha wenbo? or Fox dance??

IRAS two steps. :D
 
Back
Top