Anti Nuke will cause Taiwan bankruptcy
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/【yahoo論壇／黃士修】送出核四燃料棒的後果-台電破-041147242.html
【Yahoo論壇／黃士修】送出核四燃料棒的後果 台電破產或是台灣的信用破產
黃士修
核能流言終結者創辦人
10 人追蹤
政事觀察站2018年3月20日 下午12:11
作者為
核能流言終結者創辦人
核四
先講一個故事。" data-reactid="23">先講一個故事。
在馬政府時期，反核團體千方百計阻止用過核子燃料的乾式貯存，也不准台電送出國外進行再處理。" data-reactid="24">在馬政府時期，反核團體千方百計阻止用過核子燃料的乾式貯存，也不准台電送出國外進行再處理。
2016年1月，蔡英文勝選，確定政黨輪替。同年4月，以黃國昌服務處主任郭慶霖為首的北海岸反核行動聯盟，立刻配合「準官方」改口，宣稱他不是反對乾貯，而是露天乾貯太危險，改成室內乾貯就安全。" data-reactid="25">2016年1月，蔡英文勝選，確定政黨輪替。同年4月，以黃國昌服務處主任郭慶霖為首的北海岸反核行動聯盟，立刻配合「準官方」改口，宣稱他不是反對乾貯，而是露天乾貯太危險，改成室內乾貯就安全。
2016年9月，原能會要求台電將已經蓋好的乾式貯存場，由目前的露天式改成室內式，並且必須在貯存桶外，再加上金屬護箱。" data-reactid="26">2016年9月，原能會要求台電將已經蓋好的乾式貯存場，由目前的露天式改成室內式，並且必須在貯存桶外，再加上金屬護箱。
■ 插曲" data-reactid="27">■ 插曲
說到這裡，我不小心睡著做了一個夢。" data-reactid="28">說到這裡，我不小心睡著做了一個夢。
夢中的我在新北市核安委員會上，見到宜蘭人文基金會的陳錫南董事長，多次要求播放他製作的影片，說明某家廠商的一體成形金屬護箱安全又可靠，台電必須全部更換為該型金屬護箱。" data-reactid="29">夢中的我在新北市核安委員會上，見到宜蘭人文基金會的陳錫南董事長，多次要求播放他製作的影片，說明某家廠商的一體成形金屬護箱安全又可靠，台電必須全部更換為該型金屬護箱。
我跟陳錫南起了口角，他嗆聲核安委員會有黃士修就沒有他。過了一段時間，我接到通知，拜託我把核安委員位置讓給另一位較溫和的專家，我也就笑笑不說話。然後就醒了。" data-reactid="30">我跟陳錫南起了口角，他嗆聲核安委員會有黃士修就沒有他。過了一段時間，我接到通知，拜託我把核安委員位置讓給另一位較溫和的專家，我也就笑笑不說話。然後就醒了。
■ 突然多出的三百億元虧損" data-reactid="31">■ 突然多出的三百億元虧損
對台電來說，此舉屬國際財務報導準則解釋(IFRICs)第1號「現有除役、復原及類似負債之變動」第4段所述情況。" data-reactid="32">對台電來說，此舉屬國際財務報導準則解釋(IFRICs)第1號「現有除役、復原及類似負債之變動」第4段所述情況。
2016年12月，台電公布重大訊息，補列除役成本負債準備311.63億元，其中增加反應器內核燃料資產29.70億元，核能發電後端處置費用估計變動數281.93億元，列入該年度損益。" data-reactid="33">2016年12月，台電公布重大訊息，補列除役成本負債準備311.63億元，其中增加反應器內核燃料資產29.70億元，核能發電後端處置費用估計變動數281.93億元，列入該年度損益。
這筆費用把台電上半年獲利全部吃光，該年度的核能發電成本也暴增為往年的兩倍以上，不明所以的人還以為核能很貴。" data-reactid="34">這筆費用把台電上半年獲利全部吃光，該年度的核能發電成本也暴增為往年的兩倍以上，不明所以的人還以為核能很貴。
不知道是不是湊巧，在詹順貴投下關鍵票通過深澳電廠案引發爭議的隔天，台電就公布了核四廠的1774束燃料棒確定送回美國原廠拆解的消息。" data-reactid="35">不知道是不是湊巧，在詹順貴投下關鍵票通過深澳電廠案引發爭議的隔天，台電就公布了核四廠的1774束燃料棒確定送回美國原廠拆解的消息。
各大新聞媒體忙著報導深澳電廠的爭議，比較少在追蹤核四燃料棒這條線。（其實有一家電視台記者有問我這一段，但後來似乎沒有播出。）" data-reactid="36">各大新聞媒體忙著報導深澳電廠的爭議，比較少在追蹤核四燃料棒這條線。（其實有一家電視台記者有問我這一段，但後來似乎沒有播出。）
大家可能沒想到，送出核四燃料棒的後果，遠遠大於深澳電廠的影響。" data-reactid="37">大家可能沒想到，送出核四燃料棒的後果，遠遠大於深澳電廠的影響。
■ 非核家園就是全民買單" data-reactid="38">■ 非核家園就是全民買單
2017年1月，電業法修正案三讀通過，追加第95條第一項「非核家園條款」：核能發電設備應於中華民國一百十四年以前，全部停止運轉。" data-reactid="39">2017年1月，電業法修正案三讀通過，追加第95條第一項「非核家園條款」：核能發電設備應於中華民國一百十四年以前，全部停止運轉。
言下之意，便是核一二三廠不延役，核四廠也無法啟用。" data-reactid="40">言下之意，便是核一二三廠不延役，核四廠也無法啟用。
核一二三廠的建廠費用已折舊攤提完畢，問題不大。由於核四廠處於封存狀態，已投入的2838億元，目前仍然被列為資產，而非負債。如果確定報廢不用，就必須討論這筆帳該如何處理。" data-reactid="41">核一二三廠的建廠費用已折舊攤提完畢，問題不大。由於核四廠處於封存狀態，已投入的2838億元，目前仍然被列為資產，而非負債。如果確定報廢不用，就必須討論這筆帳該如何處理。
解決方法不外乎有二：「政府編列特別預算」或「分攤電價逐年回收」，兩者皆等同全民買單。" data-reactid="42">解決方法不外乎有二：「政府編列特別預算」或「分攤電價逐年回收」，兩者皆等同全民買單。
當時朝野正因前瞻基礎建設計畫8年8800億元吵得不可開交，政府不可能再撥個3000億元特別預算給台電紓困，所以自然傾向漲電價的方案，但這又碰觸到蔡英文總統十年不漲電價的承諾，政治上同樣敏感。" data-reactid="43">當時朝野正因前瞻基礎建設計畫8年8800億元吵得不可開交，政府不可能再撥個3000億元特別預算給台電紓困，所以自然傾向漲電價的方案，但這又碰觸到蔡英文總統十年不漲電價的承諾，政治上同樣敏感。
2017年6月，台電向經濟部提出分攤至電價的建議，經濟部也初步同意。隨後消息曝光，初估工業大戶每戶需多付758萬元、家庭用戶每戶需多付5600元，果然引起廣大民怨反彈，經濟部長李世光緊急澄清尚未拍板定案，行政院發言人徐國勇則直接否認相關訊息。" data-reactid="44">2017年6月，台電向經濟部提出分攤至電價的建議，經濟部也初步同意。隨後消息曝光，初估工業大戶每戶需多付758萬元、家庭用戶每戶需多付5600元，果然引起廣大民怨反彈，經濟部長李世光緊急澄清尚未拍板定案，行政院發言人徐國勇則直接否認相關訊息。
擱置兩個月之後，發生815大停電事件，大家也就忘了這事。" data-reactid="45">擱置兩個月之後，發生815大停電事件，大家也就忘了這事。
■ 變成核四守門神的民進黨" data-reactid="46">■ 變成核四守門神的民進黨
把核四廠成本攤提到電價的方案，前提是核四要維持在資產狀態。早在2016年7月的立法院臨時會上，時代力量便打算全數刪除核四封存預算13.56億元，當時竟然是由民進黨不分區立委陳曼麗擋下，最後只刪了5億元。" data-reactid="47">把核四廠成本攤提到電價的方案，前提是核四要維持在資產狀態。早在2016年7月的立法院臨時會上，時代力量便打算全數刪除核四封存預算13.56億元，當時竟然是由民進黨不分區立委陳曼麗擋下，最後只刪了5億元。
要知道，陳曼麗在馬政府時期，還是主婦聯盟董事長的時候，可是最激進反核電與反核食的社運人士。當上立委之後立場大轉彎，維護核四封存預算、提案開放日本福島五縣食品，都是由她親手貫徹黨意。" data-reactid="48">要知道，陳曼麗在馬政府時期，還是主婦聯盟董事長的時候，可是最激進反核電與反核食的社運人士。當上立委之後立場大轉彎，維護核四封存預算、提案開放日本福島五縣食品，都是由她親手貫徹黨意。
2017年11月，台電編列核四廠資產維護管理預算8.5億元，時代力量又打算全數刪除，也是民進黨團以人數優勢否決該提案，改為只酌減1億元。原本規劃三年的核四封存計畫即將於年底到期，也因此變相悄悄展延一年。" data-reactid="49">2017年11月，台電編列核四廠資產維護管理預算8.5億元，時代力量又打算全數刪除，也是民進黨團以人數優勢否決該提案，改為只酌減1億元。原本規劃三年的核四封存計畫即將於年底到期，也因此變相悄悄展延一年。
為什麼民進黨不敢直接判核四廠死刑？因為它們很清楚，如果不繼續編列封存預算，核四廠就必須報廢，台電恐將破產，動搖國本。" data-reactid="50">為什麼民進黨不敢直接判核四廠死刑？因為它們很清楚，如果不繼續編列封存預算，核四廠就必須報廢，台電恐將破產，動搖國本。
■ 不是隨便你玩的國際會計準則" data-reactid="51">■ 不是隨便你玩的國際會計準則
政客們互相演戲是一回事，實際上能不能做是另一回事。" data-reactid="52">政客們互相演戲是一回事，實際上能不能做是另一回事。
送出核四燃料棒是很嚴重的問題，重點不在核四能否存續，而是核四燃料棒一旦送出，再加上政府多次表示核四廠絕對不會重啟，根據國際會計準則(IASs)第16號「不動產、廠房及設備」第7段，已不符合「(a) 與該項目相關之未來經濟效益很有可能流入企業」條件，故不應認列為資產。" data-reactid="53">送出核四燃料棒是很嚴重的問題，重點不在核四能否存續，而是核四燃料棒一旦送出，再加上政府多次表示核四廠絕對不會重啟，根據國際會計準則(IASs)第16號「不動產、廠房及設備」第7段，已不符合「(a) 與該項目相關之未來經濟效益很有可能流入企業」條件，故不應認列為資產。
即使政府辯稱，核四可能整廠出售或轉型綜合火力電廠，其資產仍可堪用，根據國際會計準則第36號「資產減損」第9段，「企業應於每一報導期間結束日，評估是否有任何跡象顯示資產可能有減損。若有任一該等跡象存在，企業應估計資產之可回收金額。」" data-reactid="54">即使政府辯稱，核四可能整廠出售或轉型綜合火力電廠，其資產仍可堪用，根據國際會計準則第36號「資產減損」第9段，「企業應於每一報導期間結束日，評估是否有任何跡象顯示資產可能有減損。若有任一該等跡象存在，企業應估計資產之可回收金額。」
由於核四廠運轉發電的使用價值已被否定，可回收金額只剩變賣設備的一點殘值，資產減損也會將近三千億元。更重要的是，除非政府帶頭公然違法，否則就必須廢止原先興建核電廠的土地徵收，重新進行興建火力電廠之徵收程序，阻力異常巨大。" data-reactid="55">由於核四廠運轉發電的使用價值已被否定，可回收金額只剩變賣設備的一點殘值，資產減損也會將近三千億元。更重要的是，除非政府帶頭公然違法，否則就必須廢止原先興建核電廠的土地徵收，重新進行興建火力電廠之徵收程序，阻力異常巨大。
待到電業法第95條規定的2025年非核家園，台電更負有將核四廠除役的現時義務。由於核四廠並沒有發電，不像核一二三廠已提撥40年的核後端基金，所以必須另外撥一筆經費，將除役成本認列負債準備。" data-reactid="56">待到電業法第95條規定的2025年非核家園，台電更負有將核四廠除役的現時義務。由於核四廠並沒有發電，不像核一二三廠已提撥40年的核後端基金，所以必須另外撥一筆經費，將除役成本認列負債準備。
此處還不計台電多次重大違約，對國際商譽造成的減損損失。" data-reactid="57">此處還不計台電多次重大違約，對國際商譽造成的減損損失。
■ 比台電破產更嚴重的問題" data-reactid="58">■ 比台電破產更嚴重的問題
無論如何，台電都必須認列這筆鉅額虧損。可是台電絕對不會做，因為一做就破產。負責查核簽證的安侯建業會計事務所也不會主動做外部稽核，因為會得罪政府。至於主管我國公司營運與財務監察的經濟部和審計部，更不可能動作。" data-reactid="59">無論如何，台電都必須認列這筆鉅額虧損。可是台電絕對不會做，因為一做就破產。負責查核簽證的安侯建業會計事務所也不會主動做外部稽核，因為會得罪政府。至於主管我國公司營運與財務監察的經濟部和審計部，更不可能動作。
所以我們一次賠上國營事業的公信力、會計稽核制度的公信力、政府機關的公信力，最終導致台灣在國際上的公信力消失殆盡。" data-reactid="60">所以我們一次賠上國營事業的公信力、會計稽核制度的公信力、政府機關的公信力，最終導致台灣在國際上的公信力消失殆盡。
核四廠的發電量是深澳電廠的整整兩倍，沒有空污。核四廠啟封所需的時間，以及後續的成本，都比重新蓋一座燃煤電廠低很多。" data-reactid="61">核四廠的發電量是深澳電廠的整整兩倍，沒有空污。核四廠啟封所需的時間，以及後續的成本，都比重新蓋一座燃煤電廠低很多。
若以同為無碳的潔淨能源相比，再生能源平均成本每度5元，核四廠每度發電成本不到2元（反核團體綠色公民行動聯盟認證），每年發200億度電，一年就節省600億元。三千億元的建廠成本，核四廠只要商轉五年就能賺回來。" data-reactid="62">若以同為無碳的潔淨能源相比，再生能源平均成本每度5元，核四廠每度發電成本不到2元（反核團體綠色公民行動聯盟認證），每年發200億度電，一年就節省600億元。三千億元的建廠成本，核四廠只要商轉五年就能賺回來。
蔡政府卻寧願毀掉核四廠，也要選擇深澳電廠，對國際投資人傳遞了台灣政府缺乏理性與成本概念的訊息。" data-reactid="63">蔡政府卻寧願毀掉核四廠，也要選擇深澳電廠，對國際投資人傳遞了台灣政府缺乏理性與成本概念的訊息。
■ 試計算瘋狂的半衰期" data-reactid="64">■ 試計算瘋狂的半衰期
蔡政府高喊要注重空污與碳排問題，一面管制生煤，卻一面蓋燃煤電廠。在空污日益嚴重、反核遊行由二十多萬衰減到數百人的情況下，執意解體核四廠、大舉興建火力電廠。" data-reactid="65">蔡政府高喊要注重空污與碳排問題，一面管制生煤，卻一面蓋燃煤電廠。在空污日益嚴重、反核遊行由二十多萬衰減到數百人的情況下，執意解體核四廠、大舉興建火力電廠。
面對社會大眾強烈反彈聲浪，掩耳盜鈴地宣稱反核是全民共識，一意孤行。這凸顯出蔡英文總統的治理毫無章法、制度蕩然無存，整個國家的信用不復存在。" data-reactid="66">面對社會大眾強烈反彈聲浪，掩耳盜鈴地宣稱反核是全民共識，一意孤行。這凸顯出蔡英文總統的治理毫無章法、制度蕩然無存，整個國家的信用不復存在。
好了，現在你知道為什麼我要推動廢除電業法第95條第一項、終止非核家園條款的以核養綠公投了吧。" data-reactid="67">好了，現在你知道為什麼我要推動廢除電業法第95條第一項、終止非核家園條款的以核養綠公投了吧。
★ 更多Yahoo論壇文章
公投重啟核四救台灣
讓「陳志祥們」知道話該說到哪
惠台、對台、強台、愛台
送出核四燃料棒的後果 台電破產或台灣信用破產
蔡英文獨裁已經成為事實
【Yahoo論壇】係Yahoo奇摩提供給網友、專家的意見交流平台，所有言論不代表Yahoo奇摩立場。本文章內容僅反映作者個人意見，並經作者保證文章內容並未侵犯任何人之權利或違反相關法令。
[Yahoo Forum / Huang Shixiu] Consequences of Sending Nuclear Fuel Bars Taipower Bankruptcy or Credit Bankruptcy in Taiwan
Huang Shixiu
Nuclear Runner Terminator Founder
10 people tracking
Political Observatory on March 20, 2018 12:11 PM
The author is the founder of nuclear rumors Terminator
Nuclear Four
First tell a story.
During the Malay government era, anti-nuclear groups did everything possible to prevent dry storage of used nuclear fuel, nor did they allow Taipower to send it abroad for reprocessing.
In January 2016, Tsai Ing-wen won the election, confirming that the political parties are rotating. In April of the same year, the North Coast Anti-Nuclear Action Coalition headed by Guoqing Huang, Director of the Huang Guochang Service Department, immediately agreed with the “quasi-official” coalition to declare that he was not opposed to dry storage, but open storage was too dangerous and it was safe to change it into indoor dry storage.
In September 2016, Taiyuan will ask Taipower to change the existing dry storage facility from the current open-air type to an indoor one, and must add a metal protection box to the storage tank.
■ Interlude
Having said this, I accidentally slept and dreamed.
In my dream, I met with Chen Xinan, chairman of the Yilan Humanities Foundation at the New North City Nuclear Safety Committee. He repeatedly asked to play the video he produced, stating that the integrated metal protection box of a certain manufacturer was safe and reliable, and Taipower had to replace it all. This type of metal protection box.
I spoke with Chen Xinan, and he snored that Huang Shixiu had no him. After a while, I received a notice. Please give me the position of the Nuclear Security Commission to another gentler expert, and I will laugh and laugh. Then I woke up.
■ Sudden extra 30 billion yuan loss
For Taipower, this is the situation described in paragraph 4 of the International Financial Reporting Standards Interpretation (IFRICs) No. 1, “Changes in existing demobilization, rehabilitation and similar liabilities”.
In December 2016, Taipower announced a major news report, adding a total of 31.163 billion yuan in liabilities for decommissioning, including an increase in reactor core fuel assets of 2.97 billion yuan, and an estimated change in back-end disposal costs of nuclear power generation of 28.193 billion yuan, included in the profit or loss for that year. .
This fee ate all of Taipower's profits in the first half of the year. The annual cost of nuclear power generation also soared to more than twice that of previous years. Unknown people still think that nuclear energy is expensive.
Do not know if it happened or not, the next day after Zhan Shungui dropped a key vote and caused controversy through the Shenao Power Plant case, Taipower announced the news that 1,774 fuel rods from the Fourth Nuclear Plant had been sent back to the United States for dismantling.
The major news media are busy reporting on the disputes at the Shenzhen-Australian Power Plant, and are less concerned about tracking the nuclear four-fuel rods line. (Actually, a reporter from a TV station asked me this paragraph, but then it did not seem to be broadcast.)
It may not have occurred to us that the consequences of sending nuclear fuel rods are far greater than those of the Shenzhen Power Plant.
■ Non-nuclear homes are all pay for the people
In January 2017, the amendment to the Electrical Law was passed on the third reading and the first “Article of Non-Nuclear Homeland” of Article 95 was added: Nuclear power generation equipment should be completely suspended before the Republic of China was used more than one hundred and fourteen years ago.
The implication is that the nuclear one or two or three plants are not in service, and the nuclear fourth plant cannot be used.
The construction cost of the nuclear one or two or three plants has been depreciated and amortized. The problem is not significant. Because of the storage status of Nuclear No. 4 Plant, it has invested RMB 283.8 billion and is still classified as an asset rather than a liability. If it is determined that the scrapping is not necessary, it is necessary to discuss how this account should be handled.
There are only two solutions: "The government has a special budget" or "Apportionment of the electricity price year by year." Both are equivalent to paying by the people.
At that time, the opposition and opposition parties were arguing that they were arguing that 880 billion yuan had been spent for eight years on the basis of forward-looking basic design and design. The government could no longer allocate a special budget of 300 billion yuan to Taiwan Power to rescue them. Therefore, it naturally tends to increase the price of electricity, but this touches Cai again. The commitment of the English president to not increase electricity prices for ten years is also politically sensitive.
In June 2017, Taipower made a proposal to the Ministry of Economic Affairs to assess the electricity price, and the Ministry of Economic Affairs initially agreed. After the news was exposed, it was estimated that the large industrial households would have to pay 7.58 million yuan more for each household and 5600 yuan more for each household household. This caused widespread public grievances to rebound. Economic Secretary Li Shiguang’s emergency clarification was not finalized, and Xu Guoyong, the spokesperson of the Executive Yuan, directly denies it. Related information.
After two months of shelving, there was an 815 blackout and everyone forgot about it.
■ The DPP who became the nuclear four gatekeeper
The proposal to allocate the cost of the nuclear fourth plant to the electricity price is based on the premise that the nuclear four must be maintained in the state of assets. As early as the July 2016 interim meeting of the Legislative Yuan, the forces of the times planned to delete the 1.146 billion yuan of the nuclear quad-blocking budget, which was actually blocked by Chen Manli, the non-district legislator of the Democratic Progressive Party, and only deleted 500 million yuan.
You know, Chen Manli was the most radical anti-nuclear power and anti-nuclear food activist when he was chairman of the Housewives League in the Malay government. When the position of the legislator turned to a major turn, the maintenance of the nuclear four closure budget, and the proposal to open food in the five counties of Fukushima, Japan, were carried out by her.
In November 2017, Taipower compiled a capital maintenance and management budget for the No. 4 Nuclear Plant at a rate of 850 million yuan. The Times Force also intends to remove it in full, and it is also the Democratic Progressive Party that rejects the proposal with a number of advantages, instead of reducing it by only 100 million yuan. The original four-year planned nuclear storage project will soon expire at the end of the year, and it will be quietly extended for another year in disguise.
Why did the Democratic Progressive Party not directly judge the death penalty of the Fourth Factory? Because they are very clear, if you do not continue to set storage budget, nuclear plant must be scrapped, Taipower fear will bankrupt, shake the country.
■ IAS that you are not playing casually
It is one thing that politicians play each other. In fact, it can be another thing.
The issue of nuclear fuel rods is a serious problem. The focus is not whether the nuclear energy will survive, but whether the nuclear fuel rods will be sent once, plus the government has repeatedly stated that the nuclear plant will never restart, according to the International Accounting Standards (IASs). Paragraph 7 of “No. 16 Property, Plant and Equipment” does not meet the conditions for “(a) the future economic benefits associated with the project is likely to flow into the company” and should not be recognized as an asset.
Even if the government argues that the nuclear power plant may sell the entire plant or convert to an integrated thermal power plant, its assets can still be used. According to paragraph 9 of the International Accounting Standard 36 “Assets Impairment”, “the enterprise should end the period of each reporting period. Assess whether there is any indication that the asset may be derogated. If any of these indications exist, the company should estimate the recoverable amount of the asset."
Since the use value of the operation of nuclear power plant No. 4 has been negated, the recyclable amount will only be a residual value of the equipment sold, and the asset impairment will also be nearly 300 billion yuan. More importantly, unless the government takes the lead in blatantly breaking the law, it will be necessary to abolish the expropriation of the original land for the construction of nuclear power plants and renew the procedures for the construction of the thermal power plant. The resistance is extremely large.
Until the 2025 non-nuclear homeland as stipulated in Article 95 of the Electricity Industry Law, Taipower also has the current obligation to decommission the Fourth Nuclear Plant. Since Nuclear No. 4 Plant does not generate electricity, unlike the nuclear No. 123 Plant, which has already raised 40 years of nuclear back-end funds, it must allocate another amount of funds to recognize the cost of decommissioning as a liability.
This does not include the major breach of contract by Taiwan Electric Power Company and the loss of international goodwill.
■ More serious problems than Taipower's bankruptcy
In any case, Taipower must recognize this huge loss. However, Taipower will never do it because it will go bankrupt. An Hou Jianye accounting firm, which is responsible for checking visas, will not take the initiative to conduct external audits because it will offend the government. As for the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Audit Department, which are in charge of corporate operations and financial supervision in China, it is even more impossible to act.
Therefore, we once lost the credibility of the state-owned enterprise, the credibility of the accounting audit system, and the credibility of the government agencies, which ultimately led to the disappearance of Taiwan’s international credibility.
The nuclear power plant No. 4 produced twice as much electricity as the Shenzhen Power Plant. No pollution was found. The time required for unsealing nuclear plant No. 4 and the subsequent costs are much lower than those of a coal-fired power plant.
Compared with clean energy without carbon, the average cost of renewable energy is RMB 5 per unit, and the cost per unit of electricity generated by nuclear plant No. 4 is less than RMB 2 (the anti-nuclear organization Green Citizens Action Alliance is certified), and 20 billion kWh of electricity is generated each year. Annual savings of 60 billion yuan. With the construction cost of 300 billion yuan, the nuclear fourth factory will be able to earn back as long as it can trade for five years.
The Cai government, however, prefers to destroy the No. 4 nuclear power plant. It also has to choose the Shenao power plant, which conveys to the international investors the message that the Taiwan government lacks the concept of rationality and cost.
■ Calculate crazy half-life
The Cai government shouted that it should pay attention to the problem of air pollution and carbon emissions. While controlling raw coal, it has built a coal-fired power plant. As air pollution has become increasingly serious and anti-nuclear demonstrations have decayed from more than 200,000 to hundreds of people, they have deliberately dismantled the No. 4 nuclear plant and built large-scale thermal power plants.
Faced with a strong rebound in the public's voice, they guilely declared that anti-nuclearism is the consensus of the people and they are obstinate. This highlights the fact that President Tsai Ing-wen’s administration has no rules and the system is gone. The credit of the entire country no longer exists.
Well, now you know why I want to promote the repeal of the first paragraph of Article 95 of the Electricity Industry Law and the termination of the non-nuclear homeland rule to support the green referendum.
● This article is authorised by Huang Shixiu Yahoo Forum
★ More Yahoo Forum Articles
The referendum restarts the nuclear rescue of Taiwan
Let "Chen Chih-hsiang" know where the words should be spoken
Huitai, Taiwan, Taiwan, Taiwan, Taiwan
Consequences of sending nuclear fuel rods Taipower bankruptcy or Taiwan credit bankruptcy
Tsai Ing's dictatorship has become a reality
[Yahoo Forum] is a platform for Yahoo to provide users and experts with an exchange of opinions. All comments do not represent Yahoo's ambiguous position. The contents of this article only reflect the author's personal opinion, and the author guarantees that the content of the article does not infringe anyone's rights or violate relevant laws and regulations.
[Yahoo Forum] Welcomes Your Contribution! Do you have something to say about this social dimension? Welcome all the players to speak! Express your opinion in words.
https://goo.gl/iy5TCA">Contribute to -->
https://goo.gl/iy5TCA
