• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sentosa Cove and Reflections at Keppel Bay honggan liao

Worm

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
19,816
Points
113
SINGAPORE – Those who own or rent land along Singapore’s shorelines will be compelled under a proposed law to implement measures to shield their coastal areas from rising seas, or face a fine and jail term.

The Coastal Protection Bill was tabled in Parliament on Feb 3.

Government agencies, private landowners and long-term lessees will be given 10 years’ notice to take coastal protection measures. These could include building and maintaining sea walls and barrages, or planting mangroves, to prevent coastal flooding.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ct-their-properties-against-rising-seas-under

107795.Singapore%E2%80%99s-Sentosa-Cove-Rallies-For-A-Resurgence-3.jpg
 
Arse Fuck to Turbo God Mode…
Kar Cheng Kang got Chao Da Smell?
 
Sea levels will not rise, promoting the anti-carbon cult again. :rolleyes:

They need to maintain the narrative, otherwise all the collected carbon tax becomes nothing more than robbery to 'solve' a fictitious problem. :cool:
 
how to shield individual homes when the coastline is long and extends beyond each property’s lot? if sea level rises it is an island wide issue, not just an individual property owner’s problem. they are just pushing the responsibility down to residents who own properties at the coastline. shit luck to these owners.
 
Climate alarmism is all a scam. The PAP technocrats need to push this to please their Davos masters.

https://climateataglance.com/app/

https://rumble.com/v50z4c5-sea-levels-rising-yes-a-measly-1.2-inches-every-decade.html

NASA satellite readings that date back to 1993 show that sea level rising at a pace of just 1.2 inches every decade, and older records from tide gauges show a rate of about 1 foot per century. Hardly an existential threat, let alone one to the world's coastal cities.
 
SINGAPORE – Those who own or rent land along Singapore’s shorelines will be compelled under a proposed law to implement measures to shield their coastal areas from rising seas, or face a fine and jail term.

The Coastal Protection Bill was tabled in Parliament on Feb 3.

Government agencies, private landowners and long-term lessees will be given 10 years’ notice to take coastal protection measures. These could include building and maintaining sea walls and barrages, or planting mangroves, to prevent coastal flooding.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ct-their-properties-against-rising-seas-under

107795.Singapore%E2%80%99s-Sentosa-Cove-Rallies-For-A-Resurgence-3.jpg
"PUB and MSE said the Government, which owns 70 per cent of coastal land, will be responsible for protecting the majority of the coastline segments.

The remaining segments are occupied by private landowners and lessees who will need to implement their own coastal protection measures.

These segments are non-residential and comprise mostly shipyards and ports, as well as businesses in the oil and gas and manufacturing sectors, said Ms Angela Koh, PUB’s deputy chief executive of flood resilience."


The report says the remaining 30% are non-residential lah. Even though the affect ones are businesses, I think it is not fair for them to have to figure out what to do and to pay for it. After all, the PAP is the government of the entire island.
 
Back
Top