• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Siao lah, PUB servants who dare kaciao wealthy powerful landowners using this bill? Dont want promotion, KPI and PB from complains by them ah?

WangChuk

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Messages
5,697
Points
113
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/pub-officers-powers-forced-entry-coastal-protection-flood-bill

singapore

PUB officers to have powers to conduct forced entry to address coastal flood risk under new Bill​

PUB officers to have powers to conduct forced entry to address coastal flood risk under new Bill

PUB officers will have the power to forcibly enter areas in the event of an imminent coastal flooding incident.
PHOTO: Screengrab/YouTube/Ministry of Digital Development and Information
PUBLISHED ON March 06, 2026 4:47 PM BY Khoo Yi-Hang

Officers with Singapore's national water agency PUB may soon have powers to forcibly enter a landowner's premises to address coastal flood risks.

These powers are part of the Coastal Protection and Other Amendments Bill, which was tabled for Second Reading in Parliament on Friday (March 6).

Should the Bill be passed, these powers will help PUB officers carry out coastal protection functions, deter undesirable behaviours and provide immunities for officers carrying out their duties.

In particular, the power to conduct forced entry can only be used as a last resort, such as in the event of an imminent coastal flooding event.

"This power of forced entry will only be used judiciously, and only where there is an imminent coastal flooding event," Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu told the House.

"I would like to assure Members that we have set a high bar to activate this clause."

Immunities for authorised officers will also only apply if they have acted in good faith and with reasonable care.

Enforcement powers under PUB also include penalties for actions that affect the continuous line of defence of coastal protection and for failure to comply with a written notice from PUB.

The continuous line of defence refers to protection against permanent coastal flooding caused by sea level rise, as well as transient coastal flooding from high tides and storm surges.

Landowners of areas at this line of defence must ensure that there is a completed coastal protection measure in place by a stipulated date, Fu said.

While 70 per cent of coastline areas are owned by the Government or statutory boards, the remaining 30 per cent are not.

Under the Bill, PUB will assist the owners of the remaining 30 per cent of coastline areas with a capital grant to cover multiple costs related to coastal protection measures, as well as provide technical advice and consultations to landowners.

PUB to work with landowners​

Landowners within the continuous line of defence will be notified 10 years ahead of time prior to the expected completion of coastal protection measures, with regions to be published after studies by PUB are completed.

PUB will send out a first notification to affected landowners after their land is identified as part of the continuous line of defence.

A second notification will inform them of the specific coastal protection requirements and the date by which these measures must be in place.

Landowners will have at least five years from the second notification to implement their measures.

"Even as PUB coordinates the overall approach for coastal protection, we will work with landowners and support them in fulfilling their obligations," Fu said.
 
That's life in a totalitarian regime.

In civilized countries, there would be lawsuits.
 
That's life in a totalitarian regime.

In civilized countries, there would be lawsuits.
No checks & Balance can suka suka pass invasion of privacy laws using some justifications without having to apply warrant from court.
More powerful than the Police.
 
Coastal floods. It's all about the climate fearmongering from the anti-carbon 'sustainability' cult. Rising sea levels blah blah. :rolleyes:

Let's put it this way: if sea levels were to rise up to the levels they claim, there will be nowhere safe to hide on snot-sized Sinkieland. Not even Bukit Timah Hill. :biggrin:

It's a very simple IQ test. Unfortunately, I believe many kids have been taught to believe this nonsense. Parents, please take note. :cool:
 
Back
Top