Sengkang Grc battle to fend off leeches

[rocket]

SENGKANG GRC

Workers' Party
Jamus Lim
Louis Chua
He Ting Ru
Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik

vs

People's Action Party
Lam Pin Min
Elmie Nekmat
Theodora Lai
Bernadette Giam

 

[rocket]

Vs

PAP team for Sengkang GRC​

 

[searcher1]

Please return WP team back to the GRC ... Kum Sia Seng Kang !!!!

 

[NanoSpeed]

I want Raeesah back.

 

[shock888]

I want Raeesah back.

Raeesah the 无间道

 

[Hightech88]

It's time for some nostalgia to vote out this Lum Pah again...LOL

 

[Hypocrite-The]

Shitkang n Slumggol... wat a dump..

'Out of touch?’ Josephine Teo’s jet noise grumble during interview sparks backlash from netizens
‘Out of touch?’ Josephine Teo’s jet noise grumble during interview sparks backlash from netizens
PAP team lead for Jalan Besar GRC, Josephine Teo, drew backlash from netizens over her jet noise joke during a PAP event, with critics calling her elitist and out of touch—especially as residents in areas like Punggol and Sengkang face daily disruptions from RSAF aircraft.


Published

on

18 April 2025
By

Yustika

SINGAPORE: Netizens have criticised Minister Josephine Teo for her remark about the jet noise, arguing that it underscores her disconnect from the daily challenges faced by residents enduring the disruption.

During a media event on Wednesday (16 April) at Jalan Besar, People’s Action Party (PAP) leaders gathered to unveil their team for the upcoming elections.

The event was interrupted when the roar of jets flying overhead disrupted Minister Josephine Teo’s speech.

As the jets flew past, Teo made a lighthearted remark to her former fellow MP, Heng Chee How, referencing his role as the outgoing Senior Minister of State for Defence at the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF).

Heng’s position in the PAP line-up has been taken over by former senior civil servant Shawn Loh.

“Chee How, you’re from MINDEF, right? Want to give them a call?” Teo quipped.

As the noise persisted, she grumbled how the sound was “extraordinarily long.”

When the jets finally quietened down, a PAP member joked, “Your call worked,” prompting Teo to thank Heng as if he had indeed contacted MINDEF to halt the aircraft activity.

‘Sound of Freedom’ for the Public, But a Problem for Teo?
Teo’s remarks, captured on video, quickly triggered backlash across social media and forums.

A post on the r/SingaporeRaw forum highlighted the perceived double standards.

“When jet noise affects us, they say it is the ‘Sound of Freedom,’ and tell us to suck it up. But when it disturbs her, she tells the SMS for Defence to call MINDEF.”

Several users accused Teo of being elitist and tone-deaf, suggesting she appeared disconnected from the daily struggles of ordinary Singaporeans.


One comment pointed out that Teo’s “extraordinarily long” remark was particularly insensitive, given the jet noise residents in areas like Sengkang and Punggol endure almost every day.


Critics Slam Teo’s Remarks as Elitist and Tone-Deaf
The backlash extended to Mothership’s Instagram and Facebook pages, and The Straits Times’ Facebook post, where Teo came under further criticism.

Many accused her of being out of touch, saying her comments reflected entitlement and privilege.


One user said Teo’s approach felt tone-deaf, noting that residents have long tolerated SAF training noise out of respect for its importance.

Her joke about calling MINDEF was described as being in poor taste, implying her event took precedence over national defence.


Others pointed to Teo’s surprise at the noise, suggesting her reaction showed a lack of familiarity with the community’s day-to-day experience.

Some expressed disappointment that she seemed disconnected from the real issues residents face.


Residents Frustrated by Daily Jet Noise in Punggol and Sengkang
Residents of Punggol and Sengkang shared their ongoing frustration with the constant jet noise, describing it as a daily intrusion.

Some reported hearing jets as early as 7 a.m. and again at 7 p.m., with disruptions sometimes continuing throughout the day.


Several expressed annoyance at the brief disturbance Teo experienced. One user commented on her “extraordinarily long” remark, saying the situation in Punggol was far worse — and happened every single day.


Ignored Solutions, Lack of Action
Despite enduring these loud and disruptive sounds for years, many residents felt their complaints had fallen on deaf ears.

Some users noted that even though residents had emailed for help and suggested solutions — such as providing soundproof windows for schools affected by the constant jet noise — their concerns have been ignored.

They expressed frustration over the lack of action, particularly as the Workers’ Party (WP) has raised the issue in Parliament, yet it continues to fall on deaf ears, leaving residents — especially students and teachers — struggling for a better environment.


Jamus Lim Highlights Ongoing Struggles in Parliament
The issue was raised in Parliament during the Committee of Supply debate on 3 March 2025, when WP MP Associate Professor Jamus Lim (Sengkang GRC) addressed the disruptions caused by Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) flights.

Assoc Prof Lim said Sengkang residents face near-daily interruptions, often forced to pause work or conversations as jets roar overhead.

He explained that Sengkang’s location near the northeastern edge of Singapore worsens the impact, as aircraft often circle back after avoiding Malaysian airspace — leading to prolonged disturbances.

With more Singaporeans working from home, these disruptions have become more disruptive. Residents have reported up to seven flights per hour, especially during early mornings, evenings, and school exam periods.

Assoc Prof Lim urged the RSAF to consider clustering take-offs, modifying flight paths, avoiding peak hours, and observing quiet periods. But despite lengthy replies, the key message has remained: maintaining operational readiness is the priority.

He expressed disappointment that no meaningful relief is expected until the decommissioning of Paya Lebar Air Base in 2030.

As an alternative, he proposed exploring aerospace innovations that could reduce jet noise — including fin-line nozzles, micro vortex generators, and acoustic liners.

While stressing the importance of national defence, he urged authorities to weigh the real impact on residents’ quality of life.

Heng Chee How Defends RSAF Training
In response, Heng defended the necessity of military flight training.

He acknowledged the inconvenience but said local training is vital for pilot proficiency.

Heng highlighted current mitigation measures, including conducting flights over water, using higher altitudes, and adjusting training during key periods such as national exams.

Regarding noise-reduction technologies, Heng noted that no military aircraft manufacturers have successfully implemented fin-line nozzles or similar designs.

Still, he assured Parliament that the RSAF would continue monitoring developments to find cost-effective and operationally feasible solutions.

Heng emphasised the RSAF’s commitment to balancing operational readiness with residents’ quality of life.


Share this:

 

[TanSong]

 

[oliverlee]

thanks for the subtitles. I couldn't make head or tail of his thick accent. I only heard lam pah, and that was good enough

 

[Hightech88]

Good chances for WP to retain Sengkang GRC as well...:

-----------------------
The Workers’ Party (WP) has a strong chance of retaining Sengkang Group Representation Constituency (GRC) in Singapore’s GE 2025, with today being May 2, 2025, at 09:55 AM +08, the cooling-off day before polling. This four-member GRC, with 126,641 voters, pits WP’s incumbent team—led by He Ting Ru, with Jamus Lim, Louis Chua, and new candidate Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik—against a refreshed PAP team led by Lam Pin Min, with Theodora Lai, Elmie Nekmat, and Bernadette Giam. Let’s evaluate the factors shaping this contest.

Factors Favoring WP​

• Incumbency Advantage: WP won Sengkang in 2020 with 52.13%, marking their second GRC victory. Over five years, He, Lim, and Chua have built a presence, addressing local issues like estate management despite challenges (e.g., no managing agent since 2023). Residents like S. Kumaran (Compassvale, 11 years) value their alternative voice, and Lillian Lim (61, Compassvale) leans toward WP if they perform well, reflecting grassroots support.
• Young Voter Base: With over 50% of residents under 40 and 19.2% over 60, Sengkang’s youthful demographic aligns with WP’s focus on cost-of-living and housing affordability—key GE 2025 issues. Jamus Lim’s economic expertise and He Ting Ru’s relatable leadership appeal to this group, as seen in their 2020 upset against Ng Chee Meng’s PAP team.
• PAP’s Rebuilt Team: PAP’s frequent team changes (e.g., Ng Chee Meng, Amrin Amin, and Raymond Lye replaced by 2025) signal instability. Lam Pin Min, the sole 2020 holdover, faces a credibility gap after the loss, and the new faces lack the incumbency edge WP enjoys. Residents may see this as PAP’s attempt to “earn back trust,” as Lam stated, but it’s untested.

Factors Against WP​

• Past Scandals and Perception: Raeesah Khan’s 2021 resignation for lying in Parliament damaged WP’s reputation, though the impact has faded. Some residents, like Fionn Cheong (53, Rivervale), prioritize candidate quality, and PAP could exploit this by highlighting WP’s direct town council management issues (e.g., rats and ants at Compassvale, per Noor Idzwan, 25).
• PAP’s Resource Edge: PAP’s SG60 Cares initiative (S$60 Shopee credits) and grassroots networks outmatch WP’s resources. Lam’s seniority and the team’s focus on national stability may sway older voters (19.2% over 60), who value continuity over change.
• Boundary Stability: Sengkang’s unchanged boundaries since 2020 (per EBRC report) favor WP’s established base, but the 6,631 new voters (from 120,010 in 2020 to 126,641 in 2025) from projects like Rivervale Shores could lean PAP if they prioritize HDB benefits tied to the ruling party.

Sentiment and Context​

WP’s 2020 win (52.13%) was a slim margin, driven by a young electorate and Ng Chee Meng’s high-profile loss. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s post-2020 remark that PAP’s vote share won’t exceed 65% due to diversity demands supports WP’s case, as Sengkang’s profile fits this trend. Posts on X suggest a toss-up, with some predicting WP above 55%, reflecting confidence in their incumbency. However, PAP’s aggressive push to reclaim this GRC—evident in their refreshed team—indicates they see a winnable fight, especially with new voters.

Critical Perspective​

The GRC system, while ensuring minority representation, structurally benefits PAP through resource disparities and boundary stability that favor incumbents once entrenched. WP’s direct town council management, though a sign of autonomy, risks alienating voters if service lapses persist, a vulnerability PAP could exploit. The narrative of WP as a credible opposition, bolstered by Jamus Lim’s debate prowess, contrasts with PAP’s reliance on seasoned names, but the latter’s ability to mobilize last-minute support (e.g., via SG60 Cares) could tip the scales. Voter turnout—historically high in contested GRCs—will be decisive.

Conclusion​

WP’s chances of retaining Sengkang GRC are 60–65%, leveraging incumbency, a young voter base, and PAP’s past loss. PAP’s 35–40% likelihood reflects their resource advantage and new voter potential, but the scandal’s legacy and team turnover weaken their position. The race hinges on WP maintaining service delivery and mobilizing youth support, with a close outcome expected on May 3, 2025.
--------------------------------
Source: Grok AI

 

[rocket]

Good chances for WP to retain Sengkang GRC as well...:

-----------------------
The Workers’ Party (WP) has a strong chance of retaining Sengkang Group Representation Constituency (GRC) in Singapore’s GE 2025, with today being May 2, 2025, at 09:55 AM +08, the cooling-off day before polling. This four-member GRC, with 126,641 voters, pits WP’s incumbent team—led by He Ting Ru, with Jamus Lim, Louis Chua, and new candidate Abdul Muhaimin Abdul Malik—against a refreshed PAP team led by Lam Pin Min, with Theodora Lai, Elmie Nekmat, and Bernadette Giam. Let’s evaluate the factors shaping this contest.

Factors Favoring WP​

• Incumbency Advantage: WP won Sengkang in 2020 with 52.13%, marking their second GRC victory. Over five years, He, Lim, and Chua have built a presence, addressing local issues like estate management despite challenges (e.g., no managing agent since 2023). Residents like S. Kumaran (Compassvale, 11 years) value their alternative voice, and Lillian Lim (61, Compassvale) leans toward WP if they perform well, reflecting grassroots support.
• Young Voter Base: With over 50% of residents under 40 and 19.2% over 60, Sengkang’s youthful demographic aligns with WP’s focus on cost-of-living and housing affordability—key GE 2025 issues. Jamus Lim’s economic expertise and He Ting Ru’s relatable leadership appeal to this group, as seen in their 2020 upset against Ng Chee Meng’s PAP team.
• PAP’s Rebuilt Team: PAP’s frequent team changes (e.g., Ng Chee Meng, Amrin Amin, and Raymond Lye replaced by 2025) signal instability. Lam Pin Min, the sole 2020 holdover, faces a credibility gap after the loss, and the new faces lack the incumbency edge WP enjoys. Residents may see this as PAP’s attempt to “earn back trust,” as Lam stated, but it’s untested.

Factors Against WP​

• Past Scandals and Perception: Raeesah Khan’s 2021 resignation for lying in Parliament damaged WP’s reputation, though the impact has faded. Some residents, like Fionn Cheong (53, Rivervale), prioritize candidate quality, and PAP could exploit this by highlighting WP’s direct town council management issues (e.g., rats and ants at Compassvale, per Noor Idzwan, 25).
• PAP’s Resource Edge: PAP’s SG60 Cares initiative (S$60 Shopee credits) and grassroots networks outmatch WP’s resources. Lam’s seniority and the team’s focus on national stability may sway older voters (19.2% over 60), who value continuity over change.
• Boundary Stability: Sengkang’s unchanged boundaries since 2020 (per EBRC report) favor WP’s established base, but the 6,631 new voters (from 120,010 in 2020 to 126,641 in 2025) from projects like Rivervale Shores could lean PAP if they prioritize HDB benefits tied to the ruling party.

Sentiment and Context​

WP’s 2020 win (52.13%) was a slim margin, driven by a young electorate and Ng Chee Meng’s high-profile loss. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s post-2020 remark that PAP’s vote share won’t exceed 65% due to diversity demands supports WP’s case, as Sengkang’s profile fits this trend. Posts on X suggest a toss-up, with some predicting WP above 55%, reflecting confidence in their incumbency. However, PAP’s aggressive push to reclaim this GRC—evident in their refreshed team—indicates they see a winnable fight, especially with new voters.

Critical Perspective​

The GRC system, while ensuring minority representation, structurally benefits PAP through resource disparities and boundary stability that favor incumbents once entrenched. WP’s direct town council management, though a sign of autonomy, risks alienating voters if service lapses persist, a vulnerability PAP could exploit. The narrative of WP as a credible opposition, bolstered by Jamus Lim’s debate prowess, contrasts with PAP’s reliance on seasoned names, but the latter’s ability to mobilize last-minute support (e.g., via SG60 Cares) could tip the scales. Voter turnout—historically high in contested GRCs—will be decisive.

Conclusion​

WP’s chances of retaining Sengkang GRC are 60–65%, leveraging incumbency, a young voter base, and PAP’s past loss. PAP’s 35–40% likelihood reflects their resource advantage and new voter potential, but the scandal’s legacy and team turnover weaken their position. The race hinges on WP maintaining service delivery and mobilizing youth support, with a close outcome expected on May 3, 2025.
--------------------------------
Source: Grok AI

Wp all the way

 

[3_M]

My guess..

SK GRC
WP- 56%
PAP- 44%

 

[hbk75]

now ai can predict erections?