• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct 2013

Cosmos10

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
2,096
Points
48
Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference held on 5 October 2013

Added on: Thursday 17 October 2013
Singapore Democrats


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_-70ZZG78w

Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan outlined the SDP's ideology of building a caring and fairer system which puts people first, at the recently held party conference. (Please click on "Captions" for English subtitles)


[video=youtube;B_-70ZZG78w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B_-70ZZG78w#t=0[/video]
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Full text of Dr Chee's speech

http://yoursdp.org/news/2013-10-17-5726

Many people have asked why the our party places so much emphasis on policy-making. After all, they say, only a small fraction of the electorate reads the alternative policy papers that we put up. And those who do read them co-opt the ideas therein.

But if we did not spend the time and effort to put up such position papers, how do we know what we are fighting for? And if, we don't know what we are fighting for, how can we ask the people for their support?

Are we just opposing for opposition's sake or are we truly fighting to make the life better for the people and to make tomorrow brighter for them and for our country?

In order for us to make such policies – and more importantly policies that cohere, not just scatter-shot policies in knee-jerk reaction to the PAP – we must know what we, as a party, stand for. We must have a vision for our people. Only then can we develop a set of holistic and sound policies for our nation's future.

So what exactly do we stand for?

To answer this question, we must go back to examine the Singapore that Lee Kuan Yew has created. That society is undergirded by the philosophy, in Lee's own words, that "no one owes you a living”, "whatever you earn, it’s yours”, and "there is no such thing as a free lunch.”

These words appeal to our basest instincts and rob us of that most essential of human qualities—our ability to care.

Such thought, channeled into policy, has had more than half-a-century to work itself into our culture, and the results are not promising. We have the largest income gap amongst developed economies with all the attendant social, economic and moral ills: Citizens who are highly distrustful of each other, people who find little joy and pride in the work they do, and youths who don't bat an eye even as they see the elderly clean up after them at hawker centres.

Want fewer births? Pay women to undergo tubal ligation. Want more births? Give tax incentives to couples to have more babies. Want good cabinet ministers? Pay them million-dollar salaries. Want our children to have strong character? Reward them with cash.

Our healthcare system runs on the basis that the richer you are, the better and more prompt your medical treatment is. Elite schools offering special academic tracks charge school fees upwards of $300 a month. Our public housing system allows flats to be sold in excess of $1 million.

When we monetise things that we shouldn't, especially in circumstances where societal values are involved, we bring about harmful outcomes. Our moneyed society wreaks a pernicious effect on the public spirit: Despite having the most number of millionaires per capita in the world, Singaporeans are the least happy people; despite rated one of the best places by foreigners to immigrate to, more than half of Singapore citizens indicate they want to emigrate; and despite having a compulsory National Service, more than a third of our youths say that don't feel any loyalty to this country.

Something has gone very wrong in our society. We must change it. We must adopt a different development paradigm and go down a different path. We can, and must, appeal to our better angels.

This is where the SDP can serve our nation. At the core of our message is that we, the people of this island-nation, are all in this together and if we don't look out for one another, we descend into a society that is at once brutal and unevolved. It is a society devoid of humanity and one that we, for our own sakes, cannot afford to become.

We believe that the role of a good government is to care for citizens who need assistance and then getting out of their way when they are up and running.

This is the philosophy upon which the SDP has built our foundation and it will be the basis upon which we will continue our work. Indeed, our alternative policies are predicated on this belief that a government must care: care for the elderly who are so poor that they have to stand in line queuing up at temples just for something to eat, for that woman working two jobs just to feed her family, for the retiree who doesn't earn enough to pay for his cancer treatment.

Our ability to care will lend courage needed to question authority and to build a capacity for collective reasoning and debate that will allow us to shape our future in ways that will fulfill our aspirations and happiness.

We must stop indoctrinating our people with slogans like "no one owes us a living". Rather, we should inspire them to care for humanity. We must demonstrate to our young ones that by uplifting those around us, we ultimately uplift ourselves and our self-worth.

The only way that we can achieve this is to ensure that money and monetary incentives do not become the be-all and end-all of the way we live. The problem isn't what we aspire to, it is what we are willing to sacrifice in our effort to obtain material wealth that we should be careful about. For this will determine how happily we live.

The danger of placing money at the centre of our national life is that we abrogate our moral responsibility and devolve our decision-making to market norms. We blur our moral vision when we see everything through the lens of profit. The danger is that we become blinded by the things we want and blind to the things we really need.

Such a way of life may bring us material progress (but even this will slow down as our economy finds it difficult to regenerate itself) but the good life, the one that brings us genuine contentment, security and happiness will elude us. We need a fundamental rethink of how we pursue wealth and, more importantly, to what end.

What I have just described forms the bedrock of our Party's philosophy and core values. It is everything that we stand for, everything that we believe in, and everything that we have sacrificed for.

It is enshrined in our Party's constitution. And unlike the PAP's constitution, ours is alive and something to which we remain true. What do I mean? Take a look at the PAP's objectives as stated in their constitution and you tell me how much of it is kept:

(a) To preserve, protect and defend the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Singapore.

(b) To safeguard the freedom...of Singaporeans through representative and democratic government.

(c) To forge a nation of Singaporeans;...to infuse into Singaporeans a sense of national identity and to bind them together by patriotism and commitment to Singapore.

(d) To build a dynamic society...which also has compassion...

(e) To achieve the optimum in economic development...to provide equal opportunities for all Singaporeans to strive to fulfill themselves...

Now compare this to the objectives in our constitution:

To eliminate all forms of authoritarianism; to uphold democratic principles and institutionalise democratic practices.

To build an economically stable and progressive nation based on the free market system where...direct Government participation in business is minimised.

To foster a vibrant and dynamic society based on pluralism and diversity; to replace elitism; to remove policies that discriminate; to do away with regulation that stifles innovation...

To restore a proper system of checks-and-balance in the polity and to ensure the independence of the judiciary; to respect human, civil, and political rights of Singaporeans...

When you depart from your pledge as a party, your moral compass starts to go haywire. When you move away from what you say you believe in and what you want to achieve, you become an empty shell, a beautiful shop-front with attractive window-dressing but little else.

This is the reason why we, the SDP, has kept our constitution alive by building our alternative policies around its objectives. This is why our alternative policies on ministerial salaries, healthcare, housing, population and ethnic minority are coherent, not ad hoc and piecemeal.

A party that truly believes in the people, one that seeks to put people before profit, wisdom before wealth and rights before riches is one that will be on the right side of history.

This is who we are, this is what we stand for and this is what we must strive to uphold. It is what keeps us united as Singapore Democrats and it is what is going to help us succeed as a Party and, most importantly, it is what is going to bring this Republic of Singapore a better future.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Good future for sinkie land if we have people like CSJ to go into Parliament and speak up for sinkies. CSJ reminded me of LKY in the 1960s, full of fire in the belly, always thinking for and about the tiny red dot. When LKY grew older, he got cataract and selected the wrong successor. Now the sinkies now suffer.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

When is the SDP going to give up? :rolleyes:

The whole party would be much better off if it closed shop and the members could then do something more productive with their time.

They can start off by getting real jobs and making an effort to be assets rather than liabilities.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Now the sinkies now suffer.

Singapore is one of the wealthiest nations on earth. The current generation don't have a clue what suffering is all about. They're all spoilt brats.

The only suffering they experience is when their iPhones are stolen or misplaced or when they find a dent or scratch in their new car.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Chee is someone who should stick to being an orator of the big vision, because he is terrible at the details.

There is no payment for tubal ligation. There is no "more prompt medical treatment" for the rich. There is no HDB sold in excess of $1 million.

This is how he got fired for the error in the healthcare cost figures.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

think_like_a_proton_and_stay_positive_posters-r978fb2228f7543358b8188c1b7be5803_wve_8byvr_512.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Chee is someone who should stick to being an orator of the big vision, because he is terrible at the details.

There is no payment for tubal ligation. There is no "more prompt medical treatment" for the rich. There is no HDB sold in excess of $1 million.

This is how he got fired for the error in the healthcare cost figures.


Hi bro. tanwahp,

stay_positive_button-r36099849e0fa4f36bf625c8c1836a261_x7j3i_8byvr_324.jpg


and please try to reduce the nit-picking. Thanks :):):)
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

That's what I agree with!

Hi bro SockPuppet, thank you for your agreement :) and hope you are having a good day. Cheers
smileys-cheers-222480.gif
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Hi bro. tanwahp,

and please try to reduce the nit-picking. Thanks :):):)

I'm entitled to my views. You can ask Chee to reduce the nitpicking if it helps in his job.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

I'm entitled to my views. You can ask Chee to reduce the nitpicking if it helps in his job.

Hi bro. tanwahp, you are certainly entitled to have your own views. Nobody is denying your right to have your own views.

What I was simply requesting was for all of us to have a positive attitude, instead of being a wet blanket. Nobody in the SDP is paid by the taxpayers in any way. The SDP members/supporters are working hard for the good of Siingapore, without being paid for their time and efforts. So, instead of nitpicking and criticizing, how about you giving the SDP some constructive ideas and encouragement to help them make a positive improvement?

For example, there are four long long threads in this SBF political forum that are maintained by our brother sengkang of the WP. I admit I do NOT agree with many of the things that are done by the WP as portrayed in those four threads. In my opinions, 90% of those four threads are nothing but pictures of JB trips, Muar trips, Durian trips, Moon cake festival, Hari Raya Puasa/Haji, Chinese New Year dinner etc. Well, I like some of them and I disagree with some of them. I, personally, would prefer the WP MPs to discuss more policy issues and propose their alternative proposals to the PAP. But who am I to tell the WP what to do? The WP is answerable to their WP supporters, not to me. I have my own unfavorable opinions about the WP, but have you ever seen me going to any of those four sengkang's WP-related threads and criticizing about LTK, SL, CSM, PS, etc there????

In the final analysis, we are all Singaporeans first, party supporters second. Lets work hard, in our different ways, and look forward to a better Singapore. Thanks. :)
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

Nobody in the SDP is paid by the taxpayers in any way. The SDP members/supporters are working hard for the good of Siingapore, without being paid for their time and efforts.
disagree.

if their action has no impact then ok. but if they do something that slows/distracts the oppo cause then any true pink singaporean has the right to demand answer

So, instead of nitpicking and criticizing, how about you giving the SDP some constructive ideas and encouragement to help them make a positive improvement?
dirty your shoes walking the ground. dirty your hands knocking on doors.

I, personally, would prefer the WP MPs to discuss more policy issues and propose their alternative proposals to the PAP.
me second.

but as long as wp keeps kicking out white scum after white scum, so that we have more competition that always, always benefits the consumers then i'm ok

But who am I to tell the WP what to do? The WP is answerable to their WP supporters, not to me.
if "JB trips, Muar trips, Durian trips, Moon cake festival, Hari Raya Puasa/Haji, Chinese New Year dinner etc" are the way to kick out white scum after white scum then i'm not complaining
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

i disagree with SDP's philosophy. If I can afford it, i should be entitled to the best healthcare the private practioners can provide, my kids should be entitled to the best schools and the best teachers, my home should have the biggest dog.

SDP says that to monetize everything is wrong. But without the differentiation that comes with wealth, I am stuck in year old waiting queues for even simple procedures, like in the British NHS system, my kids have to join public schools where they may not get that kind of individualized attention and high level expert coaching, and my home can only have a small dog.

SDP must realize, once I've earned my wealth through honest means - I need to have a big dog.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

What I was simply requesting was for all of us to have a positive attitude, instead of being a wet blanket.

Factual errors have nothing to do with nitpicking or being positive. They are not negotiable even in US politics.

So, instead of nitpicking and criticizing, how about you giving the SDP some constructive ideas and encouragement to help them make a positive improvement?

I just did. Check the facts. That is a constructive suggestion for their improvement.

For example, there are four long long threads in this SBF political forum that are maintained by our brother sengkang of the WP. I admit I do NOT agree with many of the things that are done by the WP as portrayed in those four threads. In my opinions, 90% of those four threads are nothing but pictures of JB trips, Muar trips, Durian trips, Moon cake festival, Hari Raya Puasa/Haji, Chinese New Year dinner etc.

I find Sengkang's thread boring. But I can't say organizing tours is a factual error, can I?

I have my own unfavorable opinions about the WP, but have you ever seen me going to any of those four sengkang's WP-related threads and criticizing about LTK, SL, CSM, PS, etc there????

Have I also gone to every SDP thread to criticize SDP?

Not in Sengkang's threads, but have you never criticized WP in other threads? Sure?

Even if you have done that to WP, I would not think it's wrong (if there are factual errors I will correct like what I do to GMS, that's all). Even I have criticized WP myself (on 4-5 occasions).
 
Last edited:
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

If I can afford it, i should be entitled to the best healthcare the private practioners can provide, my kids should be entitled to the best schools and the best teachers, my home should have the biggest dog.

From a micro-level, individual perspective, yes.

But at a macro-level, from the perspective that I am a government, I have to ensure that if the rich get good services, the average majority should get minimum services. If the average majority can't get basic services while the rich can get good services, then something is wrong with the system.

That is why I will not vote PAP. They can't even meet basic needs like housing and transport.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

From a micro-level, individual perspective, yes.

But at a macro-level, from the perspective that I am a government, I have to ensure that if the rich get good services, the average majority should get minimum services. If the average majority can't get basic services while the rich can get good services, then something is wrong with the system.

That is why I will not vote PAP. They can't even meet basic needs like housing and transport.



But SDP says more than what you've said. SDP is combating the idea of money.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

SDP is combating the idea of money.

I don't read it that way. Chee's speech is good, just that when he starts citing examples, he commits suicide.
 
Re: SDP - Building a winning strategy: CSJ's address at SDP's party conference 5 Oct

I don't read it that way. Chee's speech is good, just that when he starts citing examples, he commits suicide.


And examples in this case are extremely important, because he's trying to make a very abstract point about monetizing public values and social norms, and if his examples are flawed at the core, that changes the way the whole article is read.
 
Back
Top