SDA reform? or SPP reform?? Form an Alliance new party? Happy Chinese New Year

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,054
Points
0
All is not well within the Singapore People’s Party (SPP) — and all this barely a week before its party congress.

Rising differences within its leadership came to a head on Friday, when the SPP’s first assistant secretary-general Wilfred Leung, who was widely-tipped to succeed veteran leader Chiam See Tong as the party’s next secretary-general, told its central executive committee (CEC) that he does not intend to accept nominations to the committee for the coming two-year term.

Leung’s announcement, Yahoo! Singapore understands, was accompanied by notice of an impending resignation from the party by another of its CEC members David Tan, who heads its SME businessmen affairs bureau. Yahoo! Singapore is also aware that Tan is a longtime friend of Mr and Mrs Chiam.

At the same time, second assistant secretary-general Benjamin Pwee communicated to the rest of the CEC his intention to also decline offers to co-opt him back into the committee for another term.

Yahoo! Singapore understands that at least three other key members of the CEC plan to either resign from the party or decline nomination or being co-opted into the committee for the new term.

Several CEC members whom this reporter spoke to on Saturday admitted that internal relations among the SPP’s leadership turned sour after the 2011 May General Election, where seven members of the party stood in two single wards — Hong Kah North and Potong Pasir — and the Bishan-Toa Payoh Group Representative Constituency.

A rift appeared to have developed between newer members of the party’s CEC and those who have led the party for a longer time, and Pwee confirmed there were differences over the style of leadership within the CEC.

“Most of us have been trying to move toward a more collective style of team leadership in the SPP, where we can consult with one another and make decisions together, or at least with a majority,” said Pwee, who added that other members of the CEC were more used to Mr and Mrs Chiam making all the decisions.

Key veterans on the party’s CEC have also expressed their discontent with Mr and Mrs Chiam, saying they felt that the Chiams had “disappointed the SPP”. More vocal members of the CEC such as Pwee and Tan, are believed to have locked horns with Mrs Lina Chiam on a number of occasions in recent months.

More developments may follow in the days leading up to the party’s congress on 29 January, where the current CEC will be relinquishing their posts and a new one is set to be elected. Given the unwillingness of at least six of its current key members, the questions of who will take over as the party’s next chairman and secretary-general remain open and unanswered.

Putting aside the internal tensions within the party, Pwee, his fellow Bishan-Toa Payoh candidates Jimmy Lee and Mohamad Hamim bin Aliyas as well as the SPP’s organising secretary Ting Sze Jiang were all smiles on Saturday afternoon.

The group -- alongside members of the National Solidarity Party (NSP), a representative of the Reform Party and presidential candidate Tan Jee Say – took part in a community outreach effort at Ang Mo Kio, distributing oranges and greeting residents ahead of the Lunar New Year.

Noticeably absent, however, were the Chiams, who Yahoo! Singapore understands planned a walkabout around Potong Pasir instead. Members of the Singapore Democratic Party were conducting parallel walkabouts as well, and the Workers’ Party had also been invited to the informal meet-and-greet session although they did not attend.

NSP secretary-general Hazel Poa told reporters that the outreach event serves to "create opportunities for (opposition parties) to have more interaction, and hopefully lead to better understanding and greater cooperation between the opposition parties in future".

Tan also stressed the importance of the opposition coming together in order to work towards presenting a credible alternative to the ruling People's Action Party.

"Ultimately we have a common purpose and a common destination... all of us are different, but we have a common objective, and we will work towards that and come together," he said.
 
with benjamin pwee, wilfred leong and jimmy lee i am quite worried about SPP

to be frank people like Chiam See Tong, Sin Kek Toong should move behind to act as advisors instead
 
CakeLengKia said:
with benjamin pwee, wilfred leong and jimmy lee i am quite worried about SPP

to be frank people like Chiam See Tong, Sin Kek Toong should move behind to act as advisors instead

Agree with you. Considering their age, should not look for their future within the party but rather their legacy.
 
For Example:-

New SDA party HQ:-

1) North SJP Malaysia-Singapore Healthy Grow Relation and Singapore Justice (Keadialan)
2) West SDP Singaporean Human Right Affairs (Demokerat)
3) Central NSP Singapore Economy, Defend and Education Affairs (Perpaduan Negara)
4) East SPP Singapore Democratic Socialist Affairs (Rakyat)
5) South RP Singapore Democracy Affairs (Reformasi)

New SDA CEC

President:-
Deputy President:-
Vice 1 President:-
Vice 2 President:-
Vice 3 President:-

Secretary General:-
Deputy SG:-
Assistant 1 SG:-
Assistant 2 SG:-
Assistant 3 SG:-

Treasurer:-
Deputy Treasurer:-
Auditor 1:-
Auditor 2:-
Auditor 3:-

Organizing Secretary:-
Deputy Organizing Secretary:-
New SDA Web/Twitter/Facebook Secretary:-
Members Party Recruit and Public Promoting Secretary:-
New SDA Event Secretary:-


Other CEC:-
 
Time for new SDA to taking over the Government?

SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said it will issue a statement on Wednesday with regard to a report by Chinese evening daily Lianhe Wanbao, alleging that the Commissioner of the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Peter Lim has been suspended.

The paper had also said director of the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) Ng Boon Gay has been called in for questioning by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau.

Quoting sources but with no official verification, the report said Mr Lim had been suspended for nearly a month, and that the case is believed to be "linked to money and women".

A spokesperson from the ministry told Channel NewsAsia both Mr Lim and Mr Ng are on leave, for now.

Mr Lim, a Public Service Commission (PSC) scholar was appointed as SCDF Commissioner in 2009.

Mr Ng, also a PSC scholar, was a former director of the Criminal Investigation Department.

He took on his current role early last year.

- CNA/wk
 
Time for the young to take over opposition

Retire President Post:- 65 years old and above

General Secretary General and Treasurer Post:- 40 years old to 62 years old

Organizing Secretary Post:- 21 years old to 35 years old.

In 1965 - 2001 we need people to build Singapore Nation

In 2001-2011 World Economy Change European Union, China and India raise. USSR and USA reform. Singaporean Politic transit from a Nation to a Gambling City (Share, Stock and Casino)

From 2012, Singaporean New Politician to plan how a City of gambling to stay competition in ASEAN. East Asian and APEC to replace old politician who still stay behind in 1965 technocrat.
 
Top 1K income Gambling Elite who profession in Gambling Property Market, stock exchange, shares, forex, fast money earning industrial and casino.

The gap of income

1) Super Rich Gambler 1%
2) The Rich Singapore 2%
3) Middle Class 7% (Politician)
4) Working Adult 85%
5) Needy 5%
 
United National Front
联合国民阵线
Barisan Nasional Bersatu
 
Similar to 1968 general election, no opposition parties except a newly formed United National Front (Singapore) that were formed by the remnants of the defunct Singapore Alliance send two candidates out of the five, namely Kampong Kapor and Ulu Pandan. Once again the PAP wins the other three by walkovers.

Who shall be the President of UNF: Chiam See Tong?, Sabestian Teo?, Sin Kek Tong? Yip Yew Weng? , Tan Chee Kien? ......

Who shall be the SG of UNF: Dr Chee? Kenneth Jaya? Steve Chia? .Jeannette Chong Aruldoss? , Hazel Poa? Tony Tan? ..........

Who shall be the Organizing Secretary of UNF: Nicole Seah? Syafarin Bin Sarif?, Noraini Bte Yunus? ........
 
Who shall the treasurer of unf: Tan Kim Lian? Tan Jee Say? Tan Cheng Bock?
 
BATU PAHAT: MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek supports the move to get ministers to declare their assets but also suggests this should cover top government officials, including secretaries-general and directors-general.

He said declaration should cover all, including spouses, and should also be made to the Prime Minister and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

However, the declaration should not be made public, he told reporters at his Chinese New Year open house here Tuesday.
 
So many Malaysian visit Singapore Casino. Always traffic Jam but Singapore LTA do nothing to improve Singapore and Malaysia Jam.
 
GEORGE TOWN: The Barisan Nasional government practises the principle of "sense of belonging and sense of togetherness" to enhance inter-racial harmony in the country, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said by being steadfast to this principle, Malaysians of all races could move forward as one nation, one people and with a singular vision.

"We need the support of all races, Malays, Chinese, Indians, Kadazan, Iban, Orang Asli and various other ethnic groups. If all of us can move forward as one people, one nation with one vision, God willing, we will be able to achieve what we hope for.

"This is not a pipe dream, not being delirious, but a sweet dream that can become a reality if we forge ahead with the sense of belonging and sense of togetherness," he said.

Najib said this when opening a Chinese New Year open house organised by Barisan here Tuesday.

Also present were Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon, who is also the Penang Barisan chairman, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop, Penang Gerakan chairman Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan and Penang Umno chief Datuk Seri Zainal Abidin Othman.

Najib said in line with this principle, the Government had introduced various forms of aid and allocations for the people irrespective of race, among them the Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia (BR1M) aid scheme whereby RM500 is given to each household where the monthly income is less than RM3,000, RM100 aid for each school student and the 1Malaysia People's Housing Project (PRIMA).

"We are able to do this because our economy is strong. It (economy) is not dictated by the vagaries of the market, because if this was the case, it would only be the rich who will benefit.

"That is why the BR1M aid scheme is a history maker," he said.

The Prime Minister also said the Government did not borrow from any party, whether local or abroad, to provide aid for the people and this was possible because of good fiscal management.

He also gave the assurance that the RM500 aid was given without any ulterior motives and that the Inland Revenue Board would not be going after those who received it.

"This RM500 aid is sincerely given...whether you want to accept it or not does not matter, but I am confident that the people who need it will take it, and coincidentally, it is being given in conjunction with the Chinese New Year," he said.

Najib said apart from this, the people also got to enjoy investing in the Skim Amanah Rakyat 1Malaysia trust fund.

"It is given based on need and investors borrowing from banks will enjoy profit of RM50 a month and after five years earn a return of RM5,000.

"There is no scheme like this in other countries...this is because we have promised to help the people," he said.

He further stressed that as the ruling government, Barisan would continue to work hard and with full commitment to ensure that the welfare of Malaysians would be looked after and that Malaysia became a developed country. - Bernama
 
DPM and Minister for Home Affairs and Minister-in-charge of the Civil Service Teo Chee Hean comments on the suspensions.

'All public officers, regardless of their position or seniority, are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity and conduct. The Government takes a serious view of public officers who misconduct themselves. Any allegations of misconduct made against public officers will be investigated fully and thoroughly. We will be fair to officers who are the subject of allegations, establish the facts and follow due process, acting in accordance with civil service disciplinary processes and the law. If officers are found to have abused the trust placed in them, we will not hesitate to take firm and decisive action against them.

'Both officers were placed on leave once the CPIB investigations commenced. We will be interdicting both officers from their duties while investigations are on-going, so that new Heads can be appointed to ensure leadership continuity. I would like to reaffirm my confidence in our SCDF and CNB officers, who are honourable professionals risking their lives on a daily basis to keep our citizens safe and secure.'
 
Wilfred Leung and Ben Pwee(BP) have both just announced that they do not want to be in SPP's CEC for the next term.

Recall that Sin Kek Tong, the party founder and ex-Chairman, also announced so in Oct 2011. Prior to that, Desmond Lim, who was once CST's earmarked protege, left the party in Mar last year.

There is a common thread across all these capitulations: The Chiams.

So we hear BP hinting strongly about a rift within the CEC, between the newer members like himself who joined the party just prior to GE2011, and 'those who have led the party for a longer time'.

There should be no confusion as to who BP is alluding to.

BP added, “Most of us have been trying to move toward a more collective style of team leadership in the SPP, where we can consult with one another and make decisions together, or at least with a majority."

Throughout CST's career, the phrase 'collective leadership' has never been in his political vocabulary. His iron-grip over SPP since 1996 is quite renowned, especially within the party. But without too.

After being deposed from SDP, his fear of history's repetition transformed itself into a distinct brand of authoritarianism. Hence, SPP became his private political kingdom.

He worked towards ensuring that his position in SPP was unassailable. That also was why his previous position as SDA chairman was explicitly secured with a special veto power for two GE terms in the alliance's constitution.

That was mainly how he has outlasted almost everyone else within the SPP CEC and also why potential successors have often fallen on the wayside when they seem to be threatening his position. Except for the recent injection of 'talents' who were attracted to the party because of the GE, SPP has no track record of grooming new leaders from within.

And just when almost everyone in Singapore expects 'The Chiam Era' to finally end due to his poor physical health, he seems to have taken on a nepotic bent. He now wants to propagate the Chiam name in SPP through his politically inept wife.

Instead of putting someone more politically competent to take over his position in Potong Pasir, he set it aside for his bumbling wife instead.

And obviously Lina is a willing partner-in-nepotism and receipient. Now being the party's sole representative in Parliament as an NCMP, she would feel self-justified in taking over the reins from CST in the party.

Even the Chiam family's long time businessman friend, David Tan (DT), seems to have finally given up on CST. Having taken up position as Head (SME Businessmen Affairs Bureau), he has also since quit the CEC.

That is where the TJS connexion arises.

DT was a former teacher at Raffles Institution and TJS was one of his students there. And during SPP's National Day dinner in Aug last year, apparently DT, in 'his personal capacity', invited TJS to turn up.

In other words, DT did not seek the Chiams' consent to have the presidential candidate grace the occasion. TJS had then just confirmed his PE nomination.

According to Melvin Tan, a WP member (or ex-member?), TJS apparently 'stole the limelight' during the party.

It should be clear whose limelight would be correspondingly dimmed.

As the party hosts, I doubt the Chiams were elated about this undue distraction by an outsider, especially from someone who was recently a GE candidate from CST's ex-party and political nemesis, SDP.

The Chiams would also have perceived TJS as exploiting the party to garner support for his PE candidacy.

Meanwhile, in Sep 2011, during a 'thank-you' lunch for campaign workers and supporters, TJS said he wants to build a coalition of Opposition parties. So he recently organised a CNY walkabout at AMK hub to hand out oranges. NSP, SPP, RP and SDP were invited (while SJP and PKMS were not).

(BP endearing himself to TJS by participating in TJS's event instead of joining the Chiams at Potong Pasir would be a further affront to the Chiams.)

Although TJS had told ST in Sep that he 'would not join any party', he would eventually need a platform for his involvement in party politics since I doubt that the Presidency is his political objective.

It would take quite an effort for TJS to start a party from scratch. Except for a few ex-SDP colleagues who are close to him and who are at least partly estranged from SDP, he does not have much of a political base. His entire political career has been a sum total of ten months.

Besides the resource constraints, he would be hard put to find the correct people with some semblance of political potential to join him in a new party. The politicians who suppported him during the PE already belong to some other political parties.

My guess is that he would want to join an existing Opposition party. And being one who talks about building an Opposition coalition, of such prominence during the PE and of such pedigree (ie. PSC scholar from Oxford, PPS to GCT, et al), the logical step for TJS would be to aspire to lead a political party one day.

He would want to do so before the afterglow from the recent PE dims.

Most of the other parties have leaders already firmly in place. NSP is out since the party is essentially firmly held by Sebastian Teo. SDP is out too, since he has essentially ostracised from it. He would not be interested in RP, since it is essentially hollow.

But guess what. Coincidentally, SPP is facing a potential leadership change and based on the ongoing news, the turmoil would present a good opportunity for an upheaval (of the Chiams).

So if TJS would like to find a political platform as springboard to his candidacy for GE 2016 and from which to form SDA Part II, guess which party would be the most appropriate?

Sit tight and watch the outflanking maneouvres and defence during the coming SPP OPC, bearing in mind the drama during the last one.

Watch out also for the possible trojan horses.

by Bryan Ti on Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 5:12pm
 
When I was just a blogger
Back in 2007, i started off as a socio-civic-political blogger utopia8787, lambasting Singapore 154th News Media, ChannelNewsAsia.com 24/7. the blog's popularity soared as anti-government sentiments then were very mild and people were worried about police knocking on your doors just because you posted things the PAP government doesn't want the average Singaporeans to know. i posted several articles on friendster(no facebook then) and as popularity increased, it later become a daily affair throughout my NS life. At the same time i was exposed to SingaporeDaily.net which led me to the now-defunct Sammyboy Delphi Forum and 3in1kopitiam.com. I was sent to 5 days Detention Barrack for this particular blog post below and my blog was forced to shut down, hundreds of posts down the drain.

http://singaporeelection.blogspot.com/2008/06/why-would-you-send-your-sons-to-ns.html

I stopped blogging and created my first facebook account and posted on Young PAP Network Facebook Group, which happens to enjoy posting ChannelNewsAsia articles. The group became my blog then and the YPAP members were constantly debating with me over my posts. It started with Seah Hock Rong, a YPAP leader in Eunos(Aljunied GRC hahah), and as he couldn't handled my questions and points, other YPAP leaders like Foong, Edgar Kieu, Eric How, Jack Lin, Michael, Abner Koh and several other YPAP members joining in the heated fray. I was invited by Junior Lee, a PAP cadre member, to this YPAP forum understand the PAP more at this NTUC building where they usually hold their forums. Christopher De Souza and Sam Tan were the 2 guests PAP MPs for the day and a ridiculously simple question "Has PAP single party rule led to apathy?" made it to the Straits Times

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_465306.html

My interview with theonlinecitizen.com(TOC's Donaldson Tan):
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/11/meet-the-protagonist-of-the-ypap-facebook-forum-war/

Going back to facebook, YPAP then started deleting my posts and eventually banned me:
http://singaporemind.blogspot.com/2009/12/alex-tan-barred-by-ypap.html

The episode got worse when Sear Hock Rong somehow managed to know of my 5 day DB sentence. I approached an anti-PAP blog Temasek Review for help and liaised with them and 3in1kopitiam.com forummers to begin posting on YPAP Network Facebook Group with numerous online monikers, which eventually led to their shutting down. I created a new group "vote for Change, vote the PAP out" (http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=153492722129) and it became very popular at that time, with all anti-PAP photos, comic strips, discussions and links posted on it.

Subsequently, upon the encouragement of online community, I decided to turn political by joining an Opposition Party. Reform Party has just taken over by KJ and I was tempted to join them, however, after going to a Meet-the-people session at Mr Chiam's Potong Pasir, I decided to join Singapore Democratic Alliance(then still under Mr Chiam). Given my relations with KJ then and for mutual benefits(RP complements SDA very much), I proposed an Alliance between SDA and Reform Party. I chose Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC because of Mas Selamat issue which happened about the same time and its close proximity to Potong Pasir, where Toa Payoh were expected to have flow-over votes. I organized the 2 parties joint-walkabouts and things were on track until the Desmond-versus-Chiam saga happened. In the process I was kicked out of SDA because I was pro-Chiam. Mr Chiam eventually withdrew Singapore People's Party out of SDA and we faced a series of problems from recruitment to plans for 2011GE. I was co-opted into the party CEC and tried to help Mr Chiam form his Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC Dream Team, as he called it then, and was also in-charge of recruitment of new members and volunteers.

Opposition RoundTable
I attended the Opposition roundtable meeting with Mr Hamim. All the Opposition Parties representatives were there and everyone started laying claims to the right to contest in several areas including Potong Pasir and Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, which were SPP's primary targets. Singapore Democratic Alliance's Desmond Lim was not willing to give up on Potong Pasir SMC and along with other disputed areas, the talks went into hours - just a waste of everybody's time. Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC was easy talk as SDP's Jufrie was a very reasonable person to talk with. SDP relented and let SPP have Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC. But for Potong Pasir, SDA's Desmond Lim was bent on contesting there. I had enough of the meeting's inefficiency and I told Desmond that if he wants to contest, he should prepare for a 3 corner fight and lose his deposit. Desmond Lim eventually lost his deposit, but to the Workers' Party.

Singapore People's Party
2 scholars, Benjamin Pwee and Jimmy Lee, who are friends of Wilfred Leung eventually joined SPP in March 2011 and along with the former assistant secretary general back from Shanghai, came in to form Mr Chiam's Dream Team. Seeing B-TPY GRC Team in good hands, I came out with the idea of contesting in Ang Mo Kio GRC against the Prime Minister so as to give AMK GRC voters a chance to vote in a proper Democracy and also to alleviate pressure on B-TPY GRC. The idea was shot down by Mr Chiam as he wanted a focused-approach(on Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC with me as the campaigning manager), without putting in extra resources to AMK GRC. I told him I disagreed in a heated CEC meeting and proceeded ahead with the idea by forming the 6-man team and promising not to use a single cents or manpower from SPP before officiating a proposal. As expected, the proposal was shot down which I believe has everything to do with my age and experience. Knowing full well SPP won't ever go to AMK GRC, I proposed the Loan Candidate Scheme, where a Memorandum of Understanding be signed between RP and SPP. 3 SPP members - Frankie Low, Jay Ting and I - were then loaned to Reform Party to contest in Ang Mo Kio GRC and West Coast GRC.

AMK GRC
Reform Party's secretary general Kenneth Jeyaretnam(KJ) and the rest of the RP members were very unwilling to contest in Ang Mo Kio GRC. KJ initially promised to come out with the electoral deposit for Arthero, Zirui, Vinesh, Osman and Mansor Rahman, but flipped flopped on the night before nomination and expected me to come out with $80,000 or $96,000 in total including my deposit. I was played out no doubt and my former SPP member Jay Ting, who was my volunteer driver then, was there to witness it all. I decided to approach the other parties. WP said no and NSP's Goh Meng Seng then said no as well. Only the Singapore Democratic Party then said we should meet up with Dr Chee. So on the night, we flew down to SDP's thomson road headquarters. Dr Chee said he will get back to me once he confirmed with John Tan and the rest of the SDP CEC. He was very busy that night and I went home after that. I waited till midnight and still didnt receive any call from him until i pestered a friend from SDP, Slyvester Lim to get Dr Chee's decision. In the end it turned out to be a no and I begin posting on Temasek Review's Facebook page to start raising the $80k.

The Ang Mo Kio GRC Team nearly couldn't be formed due to a lack of funding, volunteers and electoral deposits(amounting to 96K). I signed numerous IOUs to raise $80 000 electoral deposit, with the most significant and amazing $32 000 raised in less than 12 hours on the Eve of Nomination Day. People just surge forward through bank transfers, personal meet up and there was even someone who offered to loan me whatever was outstanding. Ang Mo Kio GRC Team was not given a single volunteer from Reform Party and Singapore People's Party, and as a result, I became the campaign manager, accounts manager, election agent and paperwork clerk for my team. I was also my own speech writer and had to organize volunteers as well. While other candidates in other political parties only need worry about their speech and walkabout, i worry about printing(posters were up 4 days late, black-n-white flyers were printed to save costs and time), walkabout route, online and mainstream media management, my own speech, fundings, volunteers, election laws and regulations during the 9 day campaigning period.

Reform Party had no plans to conduct any rally in Ang Mo Kio GRC and they always get people on the last minute to conduct a speech. I screwed up my first speech as I went on stage without a script. I didn't even know what I was talking about and intended smoked it through. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nB4ZPNwrpmg
My second speech at Clementi was better prepared but Reform Party chose to delete it for whatever unknown reason. Fortunately, my transcript was picked up by ChannelNewsAsia and we didn't get a total media blackout http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1126119/1/.html

I focused the team solely on walkabouts, getting one vote at a time...Kebun Bahru, Cheng San, Ang Mo Kio Central and Teck Ghee, where eventually most of our votes came from, with one counting station reaching as high as 37% to pull up the overall average. As AMK GRC is simply too huge an area to be covered in 9 days, we left out a lot of areas "untouched" - Jalan Kayu, Seletar Hills Estates, Hougang St 91, Buangkok, Yio Chu Kang, Lentor Avenue Estates, Sin Ming and etc. Nonetheless, our effort paid off with a 30.8% result, especially with such an extremely weak campaigning effort. There were fantastic volunteers in Ang Mo Kio GRC who even go to the extend to helping us distribute our flyers everyday. There were serious financial issues that Reform Party did not play its part and the AMK RP team members also did not cooperate, which ended me $4k in the reds while the rest happily go on with their life after that.

The result turned out to be 30.1%, or close to 50,000 votes. That was good enough an ending, I was more than happy to retain the deposits, but I ended the Election with a bitter taste of Reform Party, who have literally rendered no help to AMK GRC.

After GE...
I went back to Singapore People's Party as a member and there began the internal rifts between the Chiam's loyalists and the new people Benjamin Pwee brought in. I was naturally a Chiam supporter and was contemplating to plot to kick out Benjamin until I realize that it is futile. There was a Desmond Lim, I removed him, and here comes a Benjamin Pwee. Instead of kicking him out with whatever creative means, I chose to leave the party and not get involved with the rifts as it is already post-election period and another election wouldn't be in sight until 2016 - so who is in charge is literally none of my business.

Temaek Review
It was quiet for a while and then came the Presidential Election. I became Temasek Review Facebook page owner for a while until I was kicked out because I do not agree with the website's decision to support Tan Jee Say only. I was anything-but-Tony-Tan but the website wanted to support only Tan Jee Say even to the point of smearing Tan Kin Lian and Tan Cheng Bock. Temasek Review later went down because of an ongoing police investigation. I set up TemasekRevealed.blogspot.com to continue Temasek Review's work for a few months until TREmeritus was up. I met up with TR's webhosting RTG Asia owner, Andrew, and Kojakbt, Richard Wan, to revive Temasek Review. TREmeritus.com was then created but I resigned from the editorial team because I do not agree with the editors that TREmeritus become free advertisement for political parties especially the Reform Party and Singapore Democratic Party, who have members with co-editor rights to TREmeritus wordpress system. I wanted Workers' Party and Singapore Peoples' Party and National Solidarity Party to have an account as well, but was rejected by the anonymous chief editor.

and the story goes on...

by Alex Tan on Sunday, January 22, 2012 at 7:34pm
 
Why can't sink have a 2 party system... It makes perfect sense since we have limited Talents!
 
It is Two Party System

PAP Union 65%

English PAP and Chinese WP and very difficult to understand like ROC ans PRC

SA broken Family 35%

Lead by Chiam See Tong

SPP, SDP, NSP, PKMS, SJP, DPP, UNF, SNF and so on
 
It is Two Party System

PAP Union 65%

English PAP and Chinese WP and very difficult to understand like ROC ans PRC


Today 2011GE had change

PAP rep for Elite Scholar Leadership

WP rep for Made in Singapore Leadership (SMU, SIM, NUS, NTU and so on)
 
SINGAPORE: Six members of the opposition Singapore People's Party have resigned from their party.

They include Wilfred Leung and former civil servant Benjamin Pwee, who were widely expected to succeed the incumbent leader, Mr Chiam See Tong.

The others who resigned are the party's Organising Secretary, Ting Sze Jiang; Head of the Malay/Muslim Affairs Bureau, Mohamad Hamim bin Aliyas; Head of the Women's Wing, Mrs Mohamad Hamim bin Aliyas; and Head of the SME Businessmen Bureau, David Tan.

This comes ahead of the Party Congress to be held on Sunday, where a new Central Executive Committee (CEC) is to be formed.

Speaking to Channel NewsAsia, Mr Pwee said: "For us, Mrs Chiam is a non-constituency MP. So we feel that it is time for SPP to rise up to become a national-level party and address national issues, beyond just a single local constituency alone. So I think there are some differences in terms of approach and emphasis as to what level we (should) play at."

In a media statement, the members cited differences in opinion about party leadership styles and the future direction.

It added that deep and long-term relationships within the key CEC members had also "quickly unravelled and broken down".

But two-thirds of the CEC remain, and the Party Congress to elect a new CEC will proceed as planned.

In a posting on the Facebook page of his wife Lina Chiam, as well as that of the SPP, Mr Chiam said the six members wanted to pursue their own interests.

He said the party respects them on this. He added that there is no change at this moment and that it will be "operations as usual".

Mr Chiam said the party under his leadership will continue to seek new passionate and talented individuals, with the right aptitude and who will pursue the opposition cause cohesively.

-CNA/ac

GE 2011
GE 2006
GE 2001

After SDP win 3 seat big hat
 
Back
Top