I believe that many people were watching this case from the moment it hit the media for a number of reasons. She was a celebrity, the incident was over the top, her conduct was quite unbelievable etc
I recall that when it eventually came to sentencing and when the judge called for a probation report, all those reasons to seem to evaporate into thin air and a whole lot of different reasons surfaced. She is not exactly young, she has had a previous conviction, cases that caused less damage and violence even for a first time offender did not receive a call for probation report, was the special treatment for foreigners rearing its ugly head.
I am sure I am not the only one that feels that there is something seriously wrong with the sentence and the reasons dished out by the judge. Post natal depression for nearly a decade? I can't even recall once this lady ever expressing regret over the incident before it came to the court case. We have sent people to jail for nicking sweets, lipstick and we have sent people to jail for making a false report fearing retribution from the wife, we have sent people to jail for traffic violations that caused no damage and violence used and we have this case.
You got to wonder what Sundaresh Menon is contemplating as he sits as the Attorney General of Singapore. At the very least, this surely must be re-considered thru the Appeals process. Either we got this case wrong or we got all the other cases wrong.
Subash must be wondering why the gods have looked at him favourably for the second time. The first was when his client walked home when the judge erred in the traffic death case involving the SPH editor talking on her phone.
I recall that when it eventually came to sentencing and when the judge called for a probation report, all those reasons to seem to evaporate into thin air and a whole lot of different reasons surfaced. She is not exactly young, she has had a previous conviction, cases that caused less damage and violence even for a first time offender did not receive a call for probation report, was the special treatment for foreigners rearing its ugly head.
I am sure I am not the only one that feels that there is something seriously wrong with the sentence and the reasons dished out by the judge. Post natal depression for nearly a decade? I can't even recall once this lady ever expressing regret over the incident before it came to the court case. We have sent people to jail for nicking sweets, lipstick and we have sent people to jail for making a false report fearing retribution from the wife, we have sent people to jail for traffic violations that caused no damage and violence used and we have this case.
You got to wonder what Sundaresh Menon is contemplating as he sits as the Attorney General of Singapore. At the very least, this surely must be re-considered thru the Appeals process. Either we got this case wrong or we got all the other cases wrong.
Subash must be wondering why the gods have looked at him favourably for the second time. The first was when his client walked home when the judge erred in the traffic death case involving the SPH editor talking on her phone.
Last edited: