Pls get your wife consent before fucking

[batman1]

then how do we protect ourselves? I remember long time back some lawyer used to write in the ST about this. Cant remember his name but it did have a

' Hooi ' or something like that. He was very annoyed with the unfairness of the Womens Charter.

Then some of the bitches labelled him a misogynist.

Wong Hoong Hooi.

 

[laksaboy]

haha bro...some got the kung hu to get FOC some lack it. If you ever got to look at my face ( if you could call it that ) then you know why i cant get FOC.

There is no such thing as FOC sex. Dates cost money. Even no-strings-attached hookups cost money.

The difference with prostitutes is: you get your money's worth, you get no teasing and no drama, and you're paying to make them go away.

 

[laksaboy]

It's failure for a man to ask a woman (whether wife or not) consent for sex. It's epic failure to force her. The correct way is to make her ask you for it. Epic success is when she begs you for it. But be forewarned, there may be epic trouble following epic success if you want to leave her later.

[video=youtube;k1QuLIPFZL0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1QuLIPFZL0[/video]

 

[KNNBCCB]

Make me say "YES"... and i'm all yours...

 

[The_Hypocrite]

WHAT KIND OF STUPID Law is this? Get married cannot fuck what is the point? the one that wrote such a law should be shot...

 

[erection2015]

yes i believe thats the guy bro. Poor guy didnt get much support....either that or the Shit Times didnt publish.

Wong Hoong Hooi.

 

[Unrepented]

If the women have to beg for sex, then another set of problems, they will claim that you are no longer interested in them......after sex, they will also claim that it was like raping you, complain, complain.....women.........sigh:o

It's failure for a man to ask a woman (whether wife or not) consent for sex. It's epic failure to force her. The correct way is to make her ask you for it. Epic success is when she begs you for it. But be forewarned, there may be epic trouble following epic success if you want to leave her later.

 

[erection2015]

some guys say they make the girls pay for everything so their dates and everything else sponsored by the girl. I never had any such luck or skill.

There is no such thing as FOC sex. Dates cost money. Even no-strings-attached hookups cost money.

The difference with prostitutes is: you get your money's worth, you get no teasing and no drama, and you're paying to make them go away.

 

[Clone]

No offence bro, your friend is a f**king wimp to allow such things to happen.

Just for the record, he didn't really force himself on her right, did he?

recently, someone who is close to me has kana an order from his wife.
the contents i will not reveal but there is a advisory note at the back of the order...

it says..under Woman Charter..man must get the wife consent before having sex...if not you will charge as rape.

so next time, i need to ask:"dear, may i have sex with you?"
wife:"no."
ok go watch porn pcc?

or "dear, may i have sex with you?"
dear:"yes." alright, record it down to cover your backside. skali your performance cannot make her feel song, she sue you...die cock stand.

so in marriage, you need the wife to say YES in everything before you advance.

 

[Clone]

KNNBCCB! LOL! You standing in for ze dawg?

 

[laksaboy]

No offence bro, your friend is a f**king wimp to allow such things to happen.

Just for the record, he didn't really force himself on her right, did he?

You're missing the point. It doesn't matter if you have actually 'raped' your wife or not.

During a future quarrel, all your wife needs to get back at you is to tell the authorities (police or Family Court) that you have been 'abusive', or you have rayyyyyped her. Even if those were lies, law enforcement is predisposed to believe her side of the story over YOUR side of the story. Why? Because you are a man.

Suppose after investigations the police have found inconsistencies and discovered that she was lying about the rape. Chances are, she won't be punished. On the other hand, your reputation will most likely be irreversibly ruined. Good luck to you if you're a public figure, a civil servant (e.g. teacher).

 

[KNNBCCB]

KNNBCCB! LOL! You standing in for ze dawg?

ya lor.. maxi... i.mizz him so much.... i mean his botak head...

 

[zeddy]

ya lor.. maxi... i.mizz him so much.... i mean his botak head...

He..He..He..He.. i thought Uncle Middy come back already, skali I see its you leh Bro...

 

[zeddy]

Make me say "YES"... and i'm all yours...

Who here can make her say YES...???? Uncle Golden Dragon can..???? :p

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

recently, someone who is close to me has kana an order from his wife.
the contents i will not reveal but there is a advisory note at the back of the order...

it says..under Woman Charter..man must get the wife consent before having sex...if not you will charge as rape.

so next time, i need to ask:"dear, may i have sex with you?"
wife:"no."
ok go watch porn pcc?

or "dear, may i have sex with you?"
dear:"yes." alright, record it down to cover your backside. skali your performance cannot make her feel song, she sue you...die cock stand.

so in marriage, you need the wife to say YES in everything before you advance.

The whole picture is here, under s 375(4) of the Penal Code; and I believe it has nothing do with provisions in the Women's Charter:

(4) No man shall be guilty of an offence under subsection (1) against his wife, who is not under 13 years of age, except where at the time of the offence —
(a)
his wife was living apart from him —
(i)
under an interim judgment of divorce not made final or a decree nisi for divorce not made absolute;
(ii)
under an interim judgment of nullity not made final or a decree nisi for nullity not made absolute;
(iii)
under a judgment or decree of judicial separation; or
(iv)
under a written separation agreement;
(b)
his wife was living apart from him and proceedings have been commenced for divorce, nullity or judicial separation, and such proceedings have not been terminated or concluded;
(c)
there was in force a court injunction to the effect of restraining him from having sexual intercourse with his wife;
(d)
there was in force a protection order under section 65 or an expedited order under section 66 of the Women’s Charter (Cap. 353) made against him for the benefit of his wife; or
(e)
his wife was living apart from him and proceedings have been commenced for the protection order or expedited order referred to in paragraph (d), and such proceedings have not been terminated or concluded.
[51/2007]
(5) Notwithstanding subsection (4), no man shall be guilty of an offence under subsection (1)(b) for an act of penetration against his wife with her consent.

 

[KNNBCCB]

He..He..He..He.. i thought Uncle Middy come back already, skali I see its you leh Bro...

haha.... where is botak ???

 

[Unrepented]

But sometimes women like to act damn virgin and say don't want, but still smile smile. Is it still safe to coitus the cha bor

....................
(5) Notwithstanding subsection (4), no man shall be guilty of an offence under subsection (1)(b) for an act of penetration against his wife with her consent. [/COLOR]

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

But sometimes women like to act damn virgin and say don't want, but still smile smile. Is it still safe to coitus the cha bor

Not sometimes; it's most of the time. It's not limited to sexual advances; it's just as rampant during courtships whereupon women are most likely to pretend to "reject" you when they're actually interested in you. It's called 欲擒故縱。

 

[Clone]

I see your point.

I'm saying, in hindsight, how the hell did the guy end up being held to ransom by his own wife?

You're missing the point. It doesn't matter if you have actually 'raped' your wife or not.

During a future quarrel, all your wife needs to get back at you is to tell the authorities (police or Family Court) that you have been 'abusive', or you have rayyyyyped her. Even if those were lies, law enforcement is predisposed to believe her side of the story over YOUR side of the story. Why? Because you are a man.

Suppose after investigations the police have found inconsistencies and discovered that she was lying about the rape. Chances are, she won't be punished. On the other hand, your reputation will most likely be irreversibly ruined. Good luck to you if you're a public figure, a civil servant (e.g. teacher).

 

[laksaboy]

Not sometimes; it's most of the times. It's not limited to sexual advances; it's just as rampant during courtships whereupon women are most likely to pretend to "reject" you when they're actually interested in you. It's called 欲擒故縱。

It's called 'playing hard to get'.

Learn from James Bond.

[video=youtube;zQohVFg0omY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQohVFg0omY[/video]