If our aim is to go back to normalcy, businesses to open, people go back to work, regardless vaccinated or not, then why the differentiation between vaccinated and non-vaccinated in different settings?
Why can a non-vaccinated person take the public transport, go back to office but yet not allow to go for larger social gatherings? Don't tell us mask is the difference. We all know the lax in mask wearing in office, in public places.
Since we are opening up, I believe we are letting tourists in as well. So will the differentiation apply to tourists as well - that vaccinated tourists (with the HSA approved kind of vaccines) are allowed to dine in larger group and non-vaccinated tourists can only keep to their small group of x number of pax?
If we are not going to have this differentiation for tourists, then why should our own people be subjected to the restrictions then?
More at https://tinyurI.com/cwmfp8ys
Why can a non-vaccinated person take the public transport, go back to office but yet not allow to go for larger social gatherings? Don't tell us mask is the difference. We all know the lax in mask wearing in office, in public places.
Since we are opening up, I believe we are letting tourists in as well. So will the differentiation apply to tourists as well - that vaccinated tourists (with the HSA approved kind of vaccines) are allowed to dine in larger group and non-vaccinated tourists can only keep to their small group of x number of pax?
If we are not going to have this differentiation for tourists, then why should our own people be subjected to the restrictions then?
More at https://tinyurI.com/cwmfp8ys
