• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP Watershed Strategies vs. New, Different Challenges

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Read the first six points here...

http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2015/08/47-pap-watershed-strategies-vs-new.html

7 Serving the people

"But whichever GRC it falls under, our goals remain the same - to do our best to serve residents," said Mr Lee.

Dr. Ng also said the same thing:
"The new candidates have been actively involved, serving the residents and the grassroots organisations," he said. "We did this purposefully so that people know where they're going to serve, who they're going to serve”

It looks very strange. The PAP wants your votes and in the 2 previous elections, they just want to be ‘together with you but without serving’. They forget who their masters are and who make them a multi-millionaire.

GE2015 poses new and different challenges for the PAP and yet we don’t see any new strategy from them. When PM Lee talked about his many “one(s)” and “serving the people”, we don’t feel the sincerity. There is no compassion.

In an interview with Chan Heng Chee, PM Lee said the PAP will come with better solutions when they are not in government. So, all the above strategies are just aiming to stay in power and may not be the best solutions for Singapore.
[If we were not in the government, it is much easier. We can make recommendations, we can write papers, we can make speeches, and we can rouse arguments, unhappiness, point out all the problems we have where we are standing. But as a Government, we have to deal with this issue and it is an issue where honestly speaking, there are no easy choices. There are trade-offs.] http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/i-owe-singaporeans-a/2023914.html

We can make a better and more constructive Singapore when the PAP is not in government. New and different challenges can then be solved and ironically, the PAP works better when they are in opposition.
 
Yes. Things can only get worse before they get better.
 
All these articles are a waste of time. If Singaporeans are not happy with the government, just VOTE THEM OUT. What could be simpler? :rolleyes:
 
All these articles are a waste of time. If Singaporeans are not happy with the government, just VOTE THEM OUT. What could be simpler? :rolleyes:

But one can be unhappy only if one reads articles like this one.
Otherwise, one may not know how bad the world is - like a frog living in a well.
 
Back
Top