Opposition IB Uses Unreliable Poll of 60 People To Find Fault With PAP!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
HPETC Flyers: More than 6 in 10 Residents Offended by Attempt to Discredit WP

Victor Lye has dropped the bomb, that he was part of the group that went around distributing flyers to residents in Kovan, which is managed by AHPETC.

The PAP Branch Chairman of Bedok Reservoir-Punggol, who is widely expected to lead the PAP thrust in ALjunied GRC come the next General Elections, shared this on his Facebook page.

Victor_Lye_Facebook.jpg


Over the weekend, Redwire spoke to 60 residents in Kovan, and the neighbouring Paya Lebar, and Serangoon housing estates.

We wanted to find out how residents there took to the flyers, which highlighted AHPETC’s exorbitant managing agent rates as compared to PAP town councils, and alleged that improper governance led to AHPETC overpaying its friends at FMSS by at least S$6.4 million?

We asked them what’s their reaction to the flyers – well-received, neutral, or against – and the reasons for their response.

Those polled were required to have seen the contents of the flyers.

About 65%, or 39 people, said they were against the distribution of such flyers.

Most called it a petty attempt to win support ahead of elections.

Mrs L Lai said, “I think if the PAP supporters want to score points here, they should show with their actions which benefit people. Then we’ll consider. Instead, if they want to give out such flyers that destroy people (the WP) then what does it show?

Mr Swandi said, “They should spend their time and money doing things to improve our lives instead of printing this kind of rubbish.”

Others lamented that they hardly heard from PAP activists, and the flyer issue came as a surprise to them.

Mr Chew S H said, “We never see or hear from these people, then suddenly there are actually people to give out flyers? How come they never come for house visit and drink kopi?”

About 20% of the respondents said they supported the flyer initiative.

Most said it was necessary to reach those who still weren’t aware that they were being “taken for a ride” by the WP.

Said Ms Han Y L, “The flyers present numbers and facts, so even if the WP wants to “siam” (dodge), they can’t. More households should receive such flyers so they can know better that their so-called leaders are not what they appear to be.”

Mr Lim C C said, “I’m actually very disappointed with the WP after hearing of the AHPETC report in the news. The flyers are a good reference. They (AHPETC management) need to get their act together otherwise I don’t know how much support they are going to lose over this whole matter”.

The remaining 15% said they were neutral, or reserved their opinion on this issue.

“So long as whoever comes in does their job properly, we, the residents, will be satisfied with them. All this kind of stunts are best left to people at the top, not for us to chup jit kah (interfere)”, said Mr Ong L H.

AHPETC manages HDB estates in Aljunied GRC, which include Bedok Reservoir-Punggol, Eunos, Kaki Bukit, Paya Lebar, Serangoon Divisions, Hougang SMC and Punggol East SMC.

A PAP activist, Adam Hudazifah, has defended the flyer drop, saying it’s necessary for Aljunied residents to know the full facts and probe AHPETC leaders.

Benita Aw

http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/03/18/more-than-6-in-10-residents-offended-by-ahpetc-flyers/
 
John Tan, you are talking cock again on Opposition IB.

John Tan, get this into your thick skull.
There is no such thing as opposition IB.
If there is, it would have been reported.
You are just talking cock if you can't show us even a shred of report or any link that any opposition party has an opposition IB.


PAP IB is real and has been reported even in the press.
Here are just one of the report, PAP’s quiet counter-insurgency

Another article, THE ETHICS OF THE PAP INTERNET BRIGADE, describes the characteristics of PAP IB and raise the question of who is paying :rolleyes:
"Different identities notwithstanding, the PAP IB members share the same beliefs:
1. Blind allegiance to the PAP;
2. Belief in the PAP's hegemony; and
3. Desire to see opposition and democratic politics snuffed out.

For its lack of intelligence and inability to argue on the more substantive level involving policies and politics and its preoccupation with ridiculing and destroying the opposition and PAP's critics, the PAP IB is more a bane than boon to Singapore's democratic well-being and growth."


2. Who's Paying?

The PAP IB project also throws up the question of political ethics.

Given the involvement of many ministers, the Brigade is operating under official sanctions. The question hence arises if the PAP or the Government is financing it.

It is one thing for a political party to use its party funds to set up and run a web site to propagate its policy platform but quite another for it to draw on public resources to enhance its standing with a view to winning elections.

With the amount of money they are paid, the Ministers' time should be spent on listening to Singaporeans and devising and implementing solutions to national problems, rather than sniffing and snuffing out criticisms online."

More links on PAP IB:
PAP fights back
A (dangerously) confused PAP Government
 
Opposition IBs such as TRS, TRE and TOC operate out of social media and internet sites. They have full-time staff, local and foreign, dedicated to undermining the stability and harmony of our good government and Singapore, so that they can gain power and empty our reserves. In the meanwhile, the mainstream media has exposed TRS to be a nefarious site operated by young foreigners, who are making good money from online ads.

My grassroots sources tell me that more and more sinkies are disillusioned with TRS and are trusting Straits Times and CNA more again.
 
Back
Top