Open Letter: Should we go back to car ownership instead?

[chittychitty]

http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/include-commuter-experience-in-fare-computation

I am appalled by the new formula for the computation of public transport fare(Formula for bus, train fares set to reflect rising costs; March 23).

Previously, factors such as oil price and inflation were easy to understand. When oil prices go up, electricity prices go up, too, leading to higher operating costs and a corresponding increase in fares.

However this new factor is linked to the increasing network capacity.

Isn't that an asset? The more the network grows, the more accessible places are going to be.

This will encourage more people to abandon their car ownership dreams and start embracing public transport. Isn't this the Land Transport Authority's recent narrative for our transport system?

Now, just like how motorists pay road tax, Singaporeans are going to have to pay a "road tax" for using the public transport network. These are the same people who contribute annually to building the nation's infrastructure. Why tax them twice?

Also, the new factor is too complicated for the man on the street to understand. It should instead be tied to commuter experience and, so far, this has not been improving.

Instead of looking at more innovative ways to increase fares, LTA and the Public Transport Council should incorporate commuter experience into fare calculation. After all, this is public transport and Singaporeans do not have an alternative. Or should we go back to car ownership instead?

Desmond Teo Mingjie

 

[syed putra]

Building MRT is expensive. The costs are not shared.
If they had built roads instead of mrt's and buses, commuters will buy their own cars and motorbikes and forced to pay road taxes and tolls/ ERP etc. Running cost on car owners.
Selling season tickets months in advance may help reduce initial burden and help raise working capital and cash reserve.
And those using one time tickets should be forced to pay many times more than current rate.

 

[mojito]

http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/include-commuter-experience-in-fare-computation

I am appalled by the new formula for the computation of public transport fare(Formula for bus, train fares set to reflect rising costs; March 23).

Previously, factors such as oil price and inflation were easy to understand. When oil prices go up, electricity prices go up, too, leading to higher operating costs and a corresponding increase in fares.

However this new factor is linked to the increasing network capacity.

Isn't that an asset? The more the network grows, the more accessible places are going to be.

This will encourage more people to abandon their car ownership dreams and start embracing public transport. Isn't this the Land Transport Authority's recent narrative for our transport system?

Now, just like how motorists pay road tax, Singaporeans are going to have to pay a "road tax" for using the public transport network. These are the same people who contribute annually to building the nation's infrastructure. Why tax them twice?

Also, the new factor is too complicated for the man on the street to understand. It should instead be tied to commuter experience and, so far, this has not been improving.

Instead of looking at more innovative ways to increase fares, LTA and the Public Transport Council should incorporate commuter experience into fare calculation. After all, this is public transport and Singaporeans do not have an alternative. Or should we go back to car ownership instead?

Desmond Teo Mingjie

We did not invite those low SES FTs so that they can enjoy subsidized lifestyle in Singapore. Of course profit must be made, equally from sinkies too. It is only fair.