• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock

More confusing...:confused: Like that also can, must be Uniquely Singapore, nowadays known as Your Singapore.

How about Welcome To Singapore, This Is Your Changi Airport, a short ride from here is your Changi Prison. :eek:

Yeah they have a reserve lane, specially drawn from airport boulevard to Changi Prison..just like the YOG special lane, only the markings are invsible, you need ultra violet light..

It is know the Y! O'god (yog) lane....to your SINgapore prison... ha ha ha:D
 
Bro
The court that he was alledgedly in contempt of and the court that he may be charged in, are different courts.

sub courts act, s8
Contempt
8. —(1) The subordinate courts shall have power to punish for contempt of court where the contempt is committed —
(a) in the face of the court; or
(b) in connection with any proceedings in the subordinate courts.

has anyone read the book? did the book deal with any ongoing proceedings?

or is the agc falling back on common law definition?
...The common law definition of contempt of court is an "act or omission calculated to interfere with the due administration of justice".
http://app.subcourts.gov.sg/subcourts/page.aspx?pageid=4495
 
The court in question is not Singapore's court, it is a court own by an individual, aka old fart.
 
Agreed. He'll probably go to BBC or NY times with the book, or even Jay leno show, or Charlie Rose will interview him.

Many people can;t wait to stick the middle finger at the Old man.


On the cusp of YOG, banning would have been a bad move. Declaring Shadrake persona non grata would have been good if it stayed very quiet. But they probably knew he wouldn't have kept it quiet.

So they were in a big bind. While they were calculating what to do, Shadrake shows up at his book launch - PAPzis are caught off-guard - quite common these days. The reflex action was to arrest him. Like so many goal mouth reflex actions, this led to an own goal.

I wonder what happened this time. Usually they would classify such people persona no grata and not grant them an entry. Seems a deliberate change in tactic by the authorities. Wonder what the new strategy is. Book is also not banned. Is he the tethered goat?
 
Don't be surprised that after 21 days, he'd be arrested for overstaying, charged for that offence, convicted and then deported.

More confusing...:confused: Like that also can, must be Uniquely Singapore, nowadays known as Your Singapore.

How about Welcome To Singapore, This Is Your Changi Airport, a short ride from here is your Changi Prison. :eek:
 
Don't be surprised that after 21 days, he'd be arrested for overstaying, charged for that offence, convicted and then deported.

Wahahaha!!! You're a wasted talent not working in the AG Chambers.
 
...What an irony. Popular book shop selling in JB but they cannot sell it in SG. ha ha ha.

Since the author is not there for the money, but for his beliefs and Principles of capital punishment, he should make his book online for everyone to read - free!

Perhaps he is too busy - someone can scan soft copy and put it up on blogs or webpages.

Anyway why doesn't he writes books on capital punishment in China, Malaysia, United States, France, Russia,Germany, Japan, Australia - and all 58 other countries which practise capital punishment?

Bottomline is : Writing and taking on small size Singapore with big global image LKY - is a premium and good for his publicity and sales of his book.
 
Since the author is not there for the money, but for his beliefs and Principles of capital punishment, he should make his book online for everyone to read - free!

Perhaps he is too busy - someone can scan soft copy and put it up on blogs or webpages.

Anyway why doesn't he writes books on capital punishment in China, Malaysia, United States, France, Russia,Germany, Japan, Australia - and all 58 other countries which practise capital punishment?

Bottomline is : Writing and taking on small size Singapore with big global image LKY - is a premium and good for his publicity and sales of his book.


You had given us real food for thought! But on the other hand, if it was his intention to ride on the publicity and image of LKY for the good of his pocket, but at the same time spewing truth to the public, it is a barter I am willing to trade.

Many had betrayed their own conscious to be in the good books of the ruling elites, and those who stand up for truth and be paid for spewing truth... of the two which is of greater evil? My bet goes to the one of lesser evil.

Both may be liars, but I rather the liars that imprisoned the people through lies be condemned than for the liars that seek to free the people through lies be punished.

There is no absolute good or absolute evil in politics. Only lesser evil or greater evil. Whether money is appropriated more towards the people in proportion to their salary or more money is appropriated to themselves in proportion to money for the people.
 
see
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/alan-shadrake’s-crime

Alan Shadrake’s crime?
Posted by theonlinecitizen on July 19, 2010 61 Comments

Choo Zheng Xi -

Alan Shadrake’s book “Once a Jolly Hangman” makes for uncomfortable reading. One case in particular might have made those in power uncomfortable enough to arrest Mr Shadrake on the rarely used draconian charge of criminal defamation.

A defamation action is usually instituted in civil proceedings by a person or an institution that believes its reputation has been harmed by a statement of the defendant. Even Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew used a civil defamation action in pursuing his detractors in the international press and local opposition.

Criminal defamation brings the resources of the State to bear in what is essentially a question of protecting personal reputations.

In 2009, the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) intervened to discontinue proceedings in a criminal defamation action on the grounds that “the law of criminal defamation is not to be resorted to lightly”. The AGC noted that in a civil action, the possibility that costs may be awarded against an unsuccessful plaintiff acts as a natural barrier to frivolous action. There is no such safeguard in criminal defamation.

The United Kingdom abolished criminal defamation in July 2009.

So what agitated the authorities enough to arrest Alan Shadrake for criminal defamation, amongst other charges?

The Vignes Mourthi case?

One possible contender is his characterization of the trial and execution of Vignes Mourthi as “arguably one of the most appalling miscarriages of justice in Singapore’s history”.

Vignes Mourthi was arrested on 20 September 2001 and convicted of trafficking 27.65 grams of heroin.

Mourthi’s conviction rested largely on the strength of evidence of the officer who arrested him, Sgt S Rajkumar, a senior officer of the Central Narcotics Bureau. Sgt Rajkumar was a key witness in the prosecution’s case, and Mourthi’s defense was that an incriminating piece of evidence collected by Rajkumar had been added at a much later date.

Shadrake reveals that just three days after Mourthi’s arrest, on 23 September 2001, Sgt. Rajkumar was himself arrested for allegedly handcuffing, raping and sodomizing a young woman and for subsequently bribing her to keep silent.

In the judgment convicting Rajkumar of bribery, Judge Sia Ai Kor described his actions as “so obviously corrupt by the ordinary and objective standard that he must know his conduct is corrupt”.

Shadrake points out how the ongoing case against Rajkumar was never revealed to Mourthi’s defense lawyer, and surmises that the prosecutor and other parties must have known about Rajkumar’s case but chose to keep silent.

In his book, Shadrake characterizes Mourthi’s case as groundbreaking enough to resemble the “catastrophic failures of the justice system in Britain” that contributed to the death penalty being abolished there.

If Shadrake is right, then the authorities could very well be stepping up to the criminal defamation plate to contest his version of events.
 
Of the countries you list, only China, Malaysia, the US and Japan still practise the death penalty. But Singapore is still unique in many ways. We have the highest number of executions per capita of population.

China has the highest number of executions by far but have taken steps to rein in the use of the death penalty.

In Malaysia and Japan, executions are rarer than in Singapore in absolute numbers. And Japan is reconsidering.

Since the author is not there for the money, but for his beliefs and Principles of capital punishment, he should make his book online for everyone to read - free!

Perhaps he is too busy - someone can scan soft copy and put it up on blogs or webpages.

Anyway why doesn't he writes books on capital punishment in China, Malaysia, United States, France, Russia,Germany, Japan, Australia - and all 58 other countries which practise capital punishment?

Bottomline is : Writing and taking on small size Singapore with big global image LKY - is a premium and good for his publicity and sales of his book.
 
Our incompetent Minister Wong Kana sai say we have to defend S'pore court and Police force against attacks,

He say : "If we do not do so and allow vicious falsehoods to perversely masquerade themselves as truth, we will eventually loose our moral authority."

1.) Since it is the court that is in question, you should bring the case to International court to see if what is written in the book is falsehood and clear SG courts name once and for all, Anything less, Then what is written is the truth.

2.) Do we need to attack those world highest paid incompetent minister who masquerade as serving the people but are actually puppets of a old despot. What about a police and army that masquerade as protecting the nation but actually protecting the despot private interest? What about the old despot himself masquerade as father of the nation but actually a traitor???

3.) Do not even talk about "moral authority" because you have non, I was not given a chance to vote for years because of your wayang election policy and using of kangaroo court to bankrupt opposition masquerade as democracy. As far as I'm concern, you have no authority till I see a fair election where all seats are contested and equal representation in parliament.

Even at today's climate of fear, unfair practice and vote buying masquerade as bonus payout to civil serpent, highest paid minister in the world etc, we will still have 33% people who did not vote for you, they are only represented by only 2 seats out of the 82. What moral authority are you talking about.
I will not go into first pass the post and proportional representation model but I'm sure one day when first pass the post is working against the despot, he will quickly switch to PR model while he still command majority in parliament, just mark my words. I'm already trained to see a few steps ahead of what the despot will do and decipher his true agenda behind his crap talk.







Pro- or anti-death penalty aside, they arrested him for contempt of court before he's ever charged in court. This part beats the hell out of me.
 
Last edited:
whoever have the book, can scan and upload onto megaupload or something?

i will donate an equivalent amount (= cost of the book) to charity for that.
 
Back
Top