- Joined
- Jul 31, 2011
- Messages
- 4,476
- Points
- 113
ST misleads with statistics, propaganda
281
Posted on 14 November 2012
<IFRAME style="POSITION: static; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; MARGIN: 0px; WIDTH: 90px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; HEIGHT: 20px; VISIBILITY: visible; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=I0_1352935940136 title=+1 tabIndex=0 vspace=0 marginHeight=0 src="https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?bsv&count=true&size=medium&hl=en-US&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fnewnation.sg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewnation.sg%2F2012%2F11%2Fst-misleads-with-statistics-propaganda%2F&ic=1&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fgapi%2F__features__%2Frt%3Dj%2Fver%3DvitQ966oYZY.en.%2Fsv%3D1%2Fam%3D!9YrXPIrxx2-ITyEIjA%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAItRSTNzjIDuwx7RN-ZFoHYrSldbn9i2aw#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled&id=I0_1352935940136&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fnewnation.sg" frameBorder=0 width="100%" allowTransparency name=I0_1352935940136 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no hspace=0></IFRAME>
1 The Straits Times thought it could fudge the numbers. But fails.
Here is The Straits Times feel-good headline on Nov. 13, 2012 front page: 4 in 10 at top primary schools live in HDB flats.
Wow! More good news from The Straits Times.
Sounds really good, doesn’t it?
The message? Even if you stay in a HDB dwelling, you can make it to the top schools.
Well, everyone ought to know that this is propaganda.
Because if you know the base rate, this headline — in reality — reflects poorly on those staying in HDB flats.
So what is the base rate: Very roughly, about 80 percent of the population reside in HDB flats. Only about 20 percent reside in private residences.

Therefore, if 4 in 10 at top primary schools live in HDB flats, that means 6 in 10 at top primary schools live in private residences.
It goes to show that more kids at top schools come from a smaller pool of the total population.

The question then is: Why didn’t ST present the statistics as such? Is this really hard to represent graphically?
In the same article, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat is quoted based on his written reply in parliament that this 4 in 10 figure “broadly reflects the mix of residential housing in the vicinity of these (top) schools”.
Can you see what’s so wrong about this? Well, even if you can’t it’s ok. We can just go straight to the conclusion.
Conclusion: There is a class divide that even the education system cannot heal. The end.
You should know that this is the real headline and story that ST avoided reporting on.
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=odbPingIframeId src="about<strong></strong>:blank" frameBorder=0 name=odbFrame></IFRAME>

Posted on 14 November 2012
<IFRAME style="POSITION: static; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; MARGIN: 0px; WIDTH: 90px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; HEIGHT: 20px; VISIBILITY: visible; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=I0_1352935940136 title=+1 tabIndex=0 vspace=0 marginHeight=0 src="https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?bsv&count=true&size=medium&hl=en-US&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fnewnation.sg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewnation.sg%2F2012%2F11%2Fst-misleads-with-statistics-propaganda%2F&ic=1&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fgapi%2F__features__%2Frt%3Dj%2Fver%3DvitQ966oYZY.en.%2Fsv%3D1%2Fam%3D!9YrXPIrxx2-ITyEIjA%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAItRSTNzjIDuwx7RN-ZFoHYrSldbn9i2aw#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled&id=I0_1352935940136&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fnewnation.sg" frameBorder=0 width="100%" allowTransparency name=I0_1352935940136 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no hspace=0></IFRAME>

Here is The Straits Times feel-good headline on Nov. 13, 2012 front page: 4 in 10 at top primary schools live in HDB flats.

Sounds really good, doesn’t it?
The message? Even if you stay in a HDB dwelling, you can make it to the top schools.
Well, everyone ought to know that this is propaganda.
Because if you know the base rate, this headline — in reality — reflects poorly on those staying in HDB flats.
So what is the base rate: Very roughly, about 80 percent of the population reside in HDB flats. Only about 20 percent reside in private residences.

Therefore, if 4 in 10 at top primary schools live in HDB flats, that means 6 in 10 at top primary schools live in private residences.
It goes to show that more kids at top schools come from a smaller pool of the total population.

The question then is: Why didn’t ST present the statistics as such? Is this really hard to represent graphically?
In the same article, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat is quoted based on his written reply in parliament that this 4 in 10 figure “broadly reflects the mix of residential housing in the vicinity of these (top) schools”.
Can you see what’s so wrong about this? Well, even if you can’t it’s ok. We can just go straight to the conclusion.
Conclusion: There is a class divide that even the education system cannot heal. The end.
You should know that this is the real headline and story that ST avoided reporting on.
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=odbPingIframeId src="about<strong></strong>:blank" frameBorder=0 name=odbFrame></IFRAME>