- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
[h=2]NUS may void Darinne Ko's Law Degree & face disciplinary action[/h]
Ms Darinne Ko Wen Hui, the young woman involved in the sex-for-grades scandal, may lose her law degree. On top of that, she and the associate professor involved might face disciplinary action from the school.
These are the worst-case scenarios painted by teaching staff members at the National University of Singapore, as well as the university itself.
A spokesperson from NUS said that pending the verdict of the court case, disciplinary actions “may include revocation of the degree, certificate or any other outstanding achievements awarded earlier” to the ex-student, Shin Min Daily News reported.
Ms Ko, a former NUS law student, is alleged to have offered sex to her former associate professor Tey Tsun Hang for better grades. Tey has been charged with six counts of corruption, including two charges of sexual gratification from Ms Ko. He was alleged to have obtained, among other things, a Mont Blanc pen worth $740 and an iPod Touch.
He is now suspended from work.
According to The Straits Times, some of the teaching staff members at NUS’ law faculty have received enquiries from alumni on the case, leading the school to feel the need to clarify its actions after Tey was charged.
Another point that surfaced was that NUS did not receive the tip-off for the scandal. The tip-off went straight to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), one staff member revealed.
The person believes that the case is more complicated as the tip-off did not reach the school first. Some staff members are also curious as to how CPIB will prove that the gifts and sexual gratification were provided with the intent of bribery and how these have affected Ms Ko’s grades.
One of them said that “as the CPIB is carrying out the investigations, it is inappropriate for the school to conduct parallel investigation”.
Staff members added that even if Tey is not convicted for the charges, he and the former student might still face disciplinary action from the school, which may include being sacked, and for the ex-student, a revocation of her law degree.
Others said that even if he were found not guilty, he had already violated the “Code of Conduct” and might still be disciplined by the school.
On the other hand, although Ms Ko has already graduated and has not been formally charged, she might also face disciplinary actions from the school for breaching the “Code of Conduct”.
In the latest development today, Channel NewsAsia reported that Tey will not be leaving for Hong Kong to teach at a university there. He was scheduled to teach law from September 2012 to May 2013 there.
Tey's lawyer, Mr Peter Low, said that Tey was informed on 1 August that NUS "will not approve his sabbatical leave for academic or other purposes" and the university "is unable to support Tey's application to leave jurisdiction to teach at the university in Hong Kong".
Mr Low added that Hong Kong University is still keeping Tey's post open, "in case circumstances permit him to be in Hong Kong".
Tey will be back in court on 23 August for a pre-trial conference.
These are the worst-case scenarios painted by teaching staff members at the National University of Singapore, as well as the university itself.
A spokesperson from NUS said that pending the verdict of the court case, disciplinary actions “may include revocation of the degree, certificate or any other outstanding achievements awarded earlier” to the ex-student, Shin Min Daily News reported.
Ms Ko, a former NUS law student, is alleged to have offered sex to her former associate professor Tey Tsun Hang for better grades. Tey has been charged with six counts of corruption, including two charges of sexual gratification from Ms Ko. He was alleged to have obtained, among other things, a Mont Blanc pen worth $740 and an iPod Touch.
He is now suspended from work.
According to The Straits Times, some of the teaching staff members at NUS’ law faculty have received enquiries from alumni on the case, leading the school to feel the need to clarify its actions after Tey was charged.
Another point that surfaced was that NUS did not receive the tip-off for the scandal. The tip-off went straight to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), one staff member revealed.
The person believes that the case is more complicated as the tip-off did not reach the school first. Some staff members are also curious as to how CPIB will prove that the gifts and sexual gratification were provided with the intent of bribery and how these have affected Ms Ko’s grades.
One of them said that “as the CPIB is carrying out the investigations, it is inappropriate for the school to conduct parallel investigation”.
Staff members added that even if Tey is not convicted for the charges, he and the former student might still face disciplinary action from the school, which may include being sacked, and for the ex-student, a revocation of her law degree.
Others said that even if he were found not guilty, he had already violated the “Code of Conduct” and might still be disciplined by the school.
On the other hand, although Ms Ko has already graduated and has not been formally charged, she might also face disciplinary actions from the school for breaching the “Code of Conduct”.
In the latest development today, Channel NewsAsia reported that Tey will not be leaving for Hong Kong to teach at a university there. He was scheduled to teach law from September 2012 to May 2013 there.
Tey's lawyer, Mr Peter Low, said that Tey was informed on 1 August that NUS "will not approve his sabbatical leave for academic or other purposes" and the university "is unable to support Tey's application to leave jurisdiction to teach at the university in Hong Kong".
Mr Low added that Hong Kong University is still keeping Tey's post open, "in case circumstances permit him to be in Hong Kong".
Tey will be back in court on 23 August for a pre-trial conference.