• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

NUS Law brags about winning Law Moot Competition

Balls2U

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
18,904
Points
113
A TEAM from the National University of Singapore (NUS) won a top prize in a global law competition, beating the competition from Harvard University, Oxford University and Beijing Foreign Studies University, among others.

The NUS foursome took the Richard R. Baxter prize - the top award for the submissions of written legal arguments in a dispute between two fictitious states over sovereignty of an island.

Over 500 law schools from 80 countries took part in the prestigious Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition - the world's largest moot court contest, now in its 52nd year.

The Singapore winners were Mr Nicholas Lim Kah Hwee, 25, Ms Sarah Lim Hui Feng, 23, Ms Shirin Chua, 23, and Mr Seow Tzi Yang, 25.

All but Mr Seow have graduated. Mr Seow, a top student in his third year, is pursuing a master of laws degree at New York University (NYU) under an NUS-NYU dual degree programme.

The team's win was NUS' fifth in close to three decades. The last time it won was 14 years ago.

Its first - and probably its best - win in 1982 came from a team formed by Mr V. K. Rajah, Mr Steven Chong, Mr Davinder Singh and Mr Jimmy Yim, all of whom have become top legal minds here.

Justice Rajah now sits on the Court of Appeal, Justice Steven Chong is a High Court judge, Senior Counsel (SC) Davinder Singh is the chief executive of Big Four law firm Drew and Napier and SC Jimmy Yim is its managing partner.

That 1982 team set a record believed to have been unequalled by any other NUS team.

It not only won the Baxter Award but also the overall title after the oral presentation rounds and Mr Davinder Singh was named best overall speaker in the competition.

This year's team went to Washington for the final oral presentations in March.

The competition involved an international law suit between two fictitious states - Aspatria and Rydal - before the International Court of Justice.

The case challenged the participants to argue which state had sovereignty over an island, and how the international investment issues which arose from the dispute should be resolved.

Mr Seow and Ms Chua represented Aspatria and co-authored the arguments which were judged as the best entry by a panel comprising two former presidents of the International Court of Justice and the legal adviser to the US State Department.

The winner of the best arguments for Rydal came from the Australian National University (ANU), which beat NUS' fifth placing. ANU also emerged overall champions. The results were announced last month.

Mr Seow said yesterday: 'We thank our coaches, Professor Lim Lei Theng and Ms Hapreet Kaur Dillon, and we are also grateful to Judge of Appeal Chao Hick Tin, Professor Tommy Koh and SC Davinder Singh who judged our practice moots here before we flew off for the finals.'

Commenting on the wins, Mr Singh said yesterday: 'NUS has had a remarkable record at the Jessup Moot.'
 
The local press always makes this out to be a big thing but the truth is that nobody really gives a shit about the Jessup. The best students at Harvard, Yale, Stanford Law Schools don't waste their time on such low-brow nonsense. The ones who take part in the Jessup are the hillbillies who have too much time on their hands because they can't land internships at top law firms.

Just take a look at the winners:

http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup10/baxter.php

Yeah sure, NUS is in the 1st place but the 2nd place team is from <b>Universidad de Costa Rica</b> while the 4th place team is from the <b>National Law School of India University, Bangalore</b>.

The report deliberately misleads you by dropping big names like Harvard and Oxford instead of telling you that NUS is really in the same proud league as the Universidad de Costa Rica and the National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
 
So honorable meh

Sinkapore so small

Even if you argue like a god in UN, no one will listen to you
 
That 1982 team set a record believed to have been unequalled by any other NUS team.

It not only won the Baxter Award but also the overall title after the oral presentation rounds and Mr Davinder Singh was named best overall speaker in the competition.

Can't deny that bahyi is a damn good talker. I've seen him in court arguing an appeal. Very eloquent and to the point. But then, he shines out from the rest of the lawyers only in Sinkieland. Put him in the US or UK with the top attorneys/barristers there and see if he can outshine them!
 
That 1982 team set a record believed to have been unequalled by any other NUS team.

It not only won the Baxter Award but also the overall title after the oral presentation rounds and Mr Davinder Singh was named best overall speaker in the competition.

Can't deny that bahyi is a damn good talker. I've seen him in court arguing an appeal. Very eloquent and to the point. But then, he shines out from the rest of the lawyers only in Sinkieland. Put him in the US or UK with the top attorneys/barristers there and see if he can outshine them!

The bayi is not good lah. He kena humtum by QC before until the pappies scarred of QCs and now we can't have QCs in SG anymore unless a PAPy needs one.

The Jessup is really a non-event but you can always count on the 154th and teir daily dose of propaganda.
 
The bayi is not good lah. He kena humtum by QC before until the pappies scarred of QCs and now we can't have QCs in SG anymore unless a PAPy needs one.

The Jessup is really a non-event but you can always count on the 154th and teir daily dose of propaganda.

He's famous for "objection" and "it's irrelevant!"
 
I will only be convinced that Bayi is a good lawyer if he acts for CSJ against PAP.

The truth is you don't need to be a good lawyer to win the trial if you're acting for PAP.
 
Back
Top