- Joined
- Jun 13, 2023
- Messages
- 9,266
- Points
- 113
It is definitely not easy to sue loctor for negligence. Unless is a clear cut negligent.I suspect you might have misunderstood the [legal] meaning of negligence. If the doctor was negligent, then he did not do in "on purpose". In other words, negligence and intention are mutually exclusive. As for accident, it's called blameless inadvertence. It's NOT even negligence.
The surgery left him with weakness and partial paralysis, but he did not sue for the surgery nor did he sue the doctor who performed the surgery. He sued NUH for his initial 4 visits to the A&E Department. His claim was that the doctors at the A&E Department failed to diagnose his medical condition and [failed to] refer him to the appropriate specialist for further investigations. Subsequently, It was the doctor at the polyclinic who referred him to the Neurology Department @ NUH and he put the blame squarely on the doctors @A&E Department for the delayed treatment which resulted in his current condition.
I personally encountered a clear cut negligent case on hand. The junior fellow loctor did a poor physical action that inflicted further injury to my existing injury post ops. He should have been more careful and that wouldn't leesulted in the infliction.
In this uncle case, maybe
Nuh A&E loctor could have spotted something and lefered him to the leelavant specialist for investigation.
If the A&E loctor failed to detect that thing, and thus causing a delay in his treatment, it is a negligent on the part of the A&E loctor.
But it is not easy for the patient to proof it.