• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

NSP Press Statement on recent Floods

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Setup A Committee of Inquiry to look into improving drainage & weather warning system

NSP shares the frustration and disappointment of many Singaporeans whose lives have been severely disrupted by the reoccurring floods in recent days.

The Ministry of Environment and Water Resources under Minister Dr. Yaacob Ibrahim has reportedly spent billions in improvement works on the various canals on this island. However it seems that the situation seems to have little, marginal improvement over the years.

In 2009, when flood hit Bukit Timah, Dr. Yaacob Ibrahim has claimed that it is a once in 50 year happening. We know that this is pure exaggeration as flash floods were happening quite often in that area in the 1970s and 1980s. But since 1990s, millions, if not billions have been spent on improvement works on the Bukit Timah Canal and we would expect floods of such magnitude should be a thing of the past.

On 16 June 2010, Orchard Road was flooded, causing millions of dollars of damage to private properties and businesses. The ministry under Dr. Yaacob Ibrahim has given the excuse of debris blockade.

Today, floods appear again, not only in Orchard Road and Bukit Timah, but in various places around Singapore. What could be the excuse then?

Back in 1999, an article in New Paper has once boasted that Orchard will never flood because of the Stamford Canal. It was said that it will take a COMBINATION of hide tide and 100mm of rainfall within an hour to flood Orchard. But since the Marina Barrage has been built, high tide should not be the main issue here anymore. Could the Marina Barrage be the main issue then?

The first incidence of flooding in Bukit Timah could be excused as Act of God. The second flood in Orchard Road could be excused on the blame of debris. How about the third one? Isn’t it too much of an excuse for such floods to keep reoccurring? Could it be too much of a coincidence that such floods occur after the Marina Barrage has been built?

We hope that the government would form an Independent Committee of Inquiry on this matter. This committee should consist of people who have the expertise to review the whole drainage system in Singapore. Singaporeans should deserve better accountability from the highly paid minister and civil servants instead of resigning to praying to heaven for not flooding Singapore.

On top of that, we would also like to urge the authority and the Committee of Inquiry to look into the possibility of implementing a colour coded weather warning system. This is necessary to reduce the risks of people being exposed to adverse weathers like heavy rains and floods. A Red code rain weather warning would mean that young kids will not have to attend kindergarten while a Black code rain weather warning would mean that all classes in schools should stop. This should reduce the risk of young children being endangered by adverse weather.

Singaporeans want the government to ACT NOW to resolve and improve the drainage as well as weather forecast systems. We hope that the PAP government would respond promptly to this call.

Goh Meng Seng
Secretary General of the 13th CEC
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
The trouble with independent committees in Singapore where an issue is political, the govt will appoint an opposition MP like the proverbial Low Thia Kiang and he will end up nodding the report which then absolves the govt. Look at the NMP selection committee.

No need to appoint a committee. The letter from NSP is good and reasonable. All they have to do is explain what transpired and why are we in the mess. Most Singaporeans would know from the answers if the the explanation given has got legs.

The talk along the corridors of power is that Barrage seem to contribute to the issue. By the way, Barrages built in urban areas are notorious for causing the opposite effect.
 

metalrover

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree with the suggestion to have a independent inquiry for the floods. What are our multi-million dollars ministers doing?
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP government knows it very well .

The Flood was conceptualize to make YOU FEEL like you
need to depend on them the PAP party .

They know it . Because YOU KEEP asking them for answers !

Like YOUR life depended on it !
 

manokie

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP government knows it very well .

The Flood was conceptualize to make YOU FEEL like you
need to depend on them the PAP party .

They know it . Because YOU KEEP asking them for answers !

Like YOUR life depended on it !

They are like DRUGS

Expensive
Bad for health
Yet some people are addicted to drugs and live their life in misery

 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
We hope that the government would form an Independent Committee of Inquiry on this matter. This committee should consist of people who have the expertise to review the whole drainage system in Singapore. Singaporeans should deserve better accountability from the highly paid minister and civil servants instead of resigning to praying to heaven for not flooding Singapore.

I suggest the part of CoI's scope is also to assess the real financial damage of floodings. The costs are currently borne by citizens and businesses. Valuating the effects of the floods will clearer paint a picture of this national crisis.

We have just seen 3 floods in less than a year. Projections of damage cost will help the decision makers come up with the best solution based on a cost-benefit analysis.

Btw, the barrage was a multi million dollar project. Why did it fuck up so badly? Which committee conducted the study and who approved it?
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Btw, the barrage was a multi million dollar project. Why did it fuck up so badly? Which committee conducted the study and who approved it?

Barrage is too prevent seawater coming in !
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Dear Rogue,

Knowing PAP, they won't want to assess the damage because they are afraid to be asked to pay for the damages!

Someone actually ask me one question. Why the Barrage is at fault when there is no overflowing of water there?

First of all, if we look at the Singapore Map properly, the catchment area of the Marina Barrage is far more widespread than its surrounding. The two main rivers, Kallang River and Singapore River goes directly into the Marina Barrage. It means that with the drainage networks, practically half of Singapore has become its catchment area.

It doesn't need to overflow before other places get flooded. Anyone who understand physics, water will be spread out evenly. As long as there are places which are slight below sea level, or just above sea level, when the water level went up above that, it will flood. If the Marina Barrage is to overflow, more places will flood!

On the other hand, with a catchment area as wide as such, when there is heavy rain covering whole of Singapore, could the Barrage pump off the water fast enough? 100mm times half of Singapore's land size. Could the Barrage cope with that kind of rainfall? Not to mention that the highest rain fall we have is 500mm! What happens if just one or two of the pumps just fail?

A lot of questions need to be answered and someone should be held accountable to it. BTW, NSP is contesting against Yaacob in Jalan Besar. :wink:

Goh Meng Seng



I suggest the part of CoI's scope is also to assess the real financial damage of floodings. The costs are currently borne by citizens and businesses. Valuating the effects of the floods will clearer paint a picture of this national crisis.

We have just seen 3 floods in less than a year. Projections of damage cost will help the decision makers come up with the best solution based on a cost-benefit analysis.

Btw, the barrage was a multi million dollar project. Why did it fuck up so badly? Which committee conducted the study and who approved it?
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Besides, with more water retained in the barrage, the higher water level there, the higher pressure it will exert on the flows of water. i.e. the rate of water flow will be adversely affected... That may be one of the problems that the barrage created for the whole drainage system in Singapore.

Goh Meng Seng
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Besides, with more water retained in the barrage, the higher water level there, the higher pressure it will exert on the flows of water. i.e. the rate of water flow will be adversely affected... That may be one of the problems that the barrage created for the whole drainage system in Singapore.

Goh Meng Seng

In short, what good is an expensive degree when one lack even common sense !
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Besides, with more water retained in the barrage, the higher water level there, the higher pressure it will exert on the flows of water. i.e. the rate of water flow will be adversely affected... That may be one of the problems that the barrage created for the whole drainage system in Singapore.

Goh Meng Seng


Just like the whole of china's dams are creating massive widespread floods in China !
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Just like the whole of china's dams are creating massive widespread floods in China !

China's dams are river dams and stream diversions. They prevent (or at least lessen) floods that kept occuring through thousands of years.

The China areas that are flooded now claim no first world drainage and canal facilities like Singapore do.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
I suggest the part of CoI's scope is also to assess the real financial damage of floodings. The costs are currently borne by citizens and businesses. Valuating the effects of the floods will clearer paint a picture of this national crisis.

We have just seen 3 floods in less than a year. Projections of damage cost will help the decision makers come up with the best solution based on a cost-benefit analysis.

Btw, the barrage was a multi million dollar project. Why did it fuck up so badly? Which committee conducted the study and who approved it?
Hopefully, those citizens and businesses who suffered damage from the floods will make the government accountable.
If not for these incidents, these are the type of people who would normally vote pap without question. Business owners, car owners.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Dear Rogue,

Knowing PAP, they won't want to assess the damage because they are afraid to be asked to pay for the damages!

Any inquiry usually follows the 4W + 1H guideline (who how when what why). Of course there will be resistance. But that's the job of the opposition: to ask intelligent questions.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Hopefully, those citizens and businesses who suffered damage from the floods will make the government accountable.
If not for these incidents, these are the type of people who would normally vote pap without question. Business owners, car owners.

Unfortunately 45 years of one party rule has made citizens unaware of their own rights.
 
Top