nice sweet Putin Nuke 2016 model = SARMAT

[nkfnkfnkf]

This latest new toy as promised by Russian Strategic Nuke General, in respond to Obama's new missile defense system, now already tested and deploying.

It's main purposes is USA can never do any interception.

To achieve this, it is FASTEST. More than 20X speed of sound, to reach NY from Moscow is just only 8 mins + !

In a typically attack USA got nuked by 15 nuke warheads within just minutes from each Sarmat ICBM, within 5~6mins from each launching @Russian base 15 mushroom clouds will rise in USA.

The design is within just10~15 seconds after leaving launch silo, it's already flying in untrackable trajectories, very high speed and unpredictable non-uniform path.

After leaving earth's atmosphere, before re-entering atmosphere, MIRV will throw 15 nuke warheads out.

A multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) is a ballistic missile payload containing several warheads, each capable of being aimed to hit one of a group of targets. By contrast a unitary warhead is a single warhead on a single missile.

This concept is for Putin to be sure that if he decided to nuke USA targets, they will certainly turn into nuke dust without any uncertainty nor variables. They be nuked away is the only possible outcome, not defendable.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat



RS-28 Sarmat
This article is about the Russian Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. For the Polish-Lithuanian worldview, see Sarmatism.
RS-28 (Sarmat)
Type Heavy Intercontinental ballistic missile
Place*of*origin Russia
Service history
Used*by Russian Strategic Missile Troops
Production history
Designer Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau
Manufacturer Krasnoyarsk machine-building plant , НПО Энергомаш , НПО маш , KBKhA
Specifications
Weight Over 100 tonnes
Warhead
Up to 15 MIRVs[1] (various type and yield , 3 to more will be 9Mt to 40 Mt , a single can be within 40 25 Mt , 4 6 8 - 20 Mt to > 40 Mt each)

with extensive counter-BMD measures.
Engine 4 РД-274 RD-274 first stage Liquid-fueled
Propellant Liquid
Operational
range
approx. 10,000 kilometres (6,200*mi)
Speed over Mach*20 (24,500*km/h; 15,220*mph; 6.806*km/s)
Guidance
system
Inertial guidance, GLONASS, Astrocelestial also
Launch
platform
Silo
The RS-28[2] РС-28 Сармат (also known as Sarmat, or Sarmatian) SS-X-30 is a future Russian liquid-fueled, MIRV-equipped, super-heavy thermonuclear armed intercontinental ballistic missile in development by the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau[2] from 2009,[3] intended to replace the previous SS-18 Satan. Its large payload would allow for up to 10 heavy warheads or 15 lighter ones, and/or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of countermeasures designed to defeat anti-missile systems;[4][5] it was heralded by the Russian military as a response to the U.S. Prompt Global Strike.[6]

In February 2014, a Russian military official announced the Sarmat was expected to be ready for deployment around 2020.[7] In May that year another official source suggested that the program was being accelerated and that it would, in his opinion, constitute up to 100 percent of Russia's fixed land-based nuclear arsenal by 2021.[6][8] At the end of June 2015, it was reported that the production schedule for the first prototype of the Sarmat was slipping.[9][10] The RS-28 Sarmat is expected to become operational in 2016.[11]

See also

References

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

Putin is planet earth's Nuke Czar.

His absent VETO the World Nuke Security Summit: all small flies talk cock sing song are INSIGNIFICANT, as Czar not recognized your agreement.


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/31/nuclear-security-summit-obama-russia-absence

Nuclear weapons
Russia's absence means nuclear summit likely to end in anticlimax for Obama
Signature policy initiative for the president is set to fall short of its goals as the state with the biggest nuclear arsenal stays away from the Washington meeting


Barack Obama a previous Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague in March 2014. Analysts suspect this week’s summit in Washington may be the last for some time. Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
David Smith in Washington
Thursday 31 March 2016 15.30*BST Last modified on Thursday 31 March 2016 19.19*BST

Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+ Share on WhatsApp
Shares
246
Comments
220
Save for later
When Barack Obama welcomes more than 50 world leaders to Washington on Thursday ahead of his fourth and final nuclear security summit, one of the most important chairs will be empty.

Russia is thought to possess more nuclear weapons than any other country, including the US. Together the cold war foes share more than 90% of the world’s arsenal. So President Vladimir Putin’s decision to boycott the high-level talks threatens to turn them into an elaborate anticlimax, even as fears of nuclear terrorism are on the up.


Barack Obama launches doctrine for nuclear-free world
Read more
“This is the last of the summits and Putin isn’t even participating,” said Professor Peter Kuznick, director of the Nuclear Studies Institute at American University in Washington DC. “It’s going to lose momentum at a time we need to be increasing momentum.”

Indeed, one of Obama’s signature foreign policy initiatives is now seen by some as a metaphor for his presidency: laudable for some real and significant achievements but incremental rather than revolutionary, ultimately falling short of ambitious goals, including his own.

Nuclear talks appear to be a victim of the tensions between Washington and Moscow in general and Obama and Putin in particular. Earlier this week, for example, the American president memorably recalled how Putin had disagreed with some of the statements about foreign policy he had made in an interview with the Atlantic magazine. “I pointed out to him, of course, that unlike you, Vladimir, I don’t get to edit the piece before it’s published.”

In an opinion column in the Washington Post on Wednesday, Obama argued that the US and Russia should negotiate to further reduce their nuclear stockpiles. “Our massive cold war nuclear arsenal is poorly suited to today’s threats,” he said. But the Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, told Reuters that Russia was skipping the summit because of a “shortage of mutual cooperation” in working out the agenda.

Advertisement

Ben Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, described the decision as “a missed opportunity for Russia above all”, adding: “Frankly, all they’re doing is isolating themselves in not participating as they have in the past.” But he insisted that the countries have “ongoing cooperation and dialogue”.

But there is still plenty to talk about in Washington. The recent terrorist attacks in Brussels have fuelled concerns that Islamic State could eventually target nuclear plants and develop radioactive “dirty bombs”. Two of the suicide bombers involved in this month’s attack secretly filmed the daily routine of the head of Belgium’s nuclear research and development programme and considered an attack on a nuclear site in the country, according to Belgian media. There will be a special session during the summit aimed at coordinating efforts to defeat Isis.

Advertisement

Experts warn that much of the world’s plutonium and highly enriched uranium remains vulnerable to theft at thousands of sites, including universities and hospitals. But Laura Holgate, the White House National Security Council’s senior director for weapons of mass destruction, pointed to commitments from 30 countries at the 2014 summit to secure their most dangerous material. “The international community has made it harder than ever for terrorists to acquire nuclear weapons, and that has made us all more secure,” she told reporters.

Then there is the North Korea question, following Pyongyang’s detonation of a nuclear device in January and long-range rocket launch a month later. On Thursday Obama will meet the Japanese prime minister, Shinzo Abe, and South Korean president, Park Geun-hye, followed by separate talks with President Xi Jinping of China. “The international community must remain united in the face of North Korea’s continued provocations,” he wrote in the Washington Post.


North Korea shows off a new rocket launching system. Kim Jong-un has claimed a ‘historic’ advance in the country’s nuclear strike capability. Photograph: KCNA/AFP/Getty Images
Obama inaugurated the nuclear security summit nearly six years ago after a landmark speech in Prague in 2009 that defined ridding the world of nuclear weapons as a central theme of his presidency. He can certainly claim victories, notably the recent Iran deal and 12 countries having completely eliminated highly enriched uranium or separated plutonium, but commentators say progress has slowed since the last summit in 2014 and now Pakistan, India and Japan are moving towards an increase of their stockpiles.

The Nuclear Threat Initiative, an anti-proliferation watchdog, found that over the past two years there has been no improvement in measures including on-site physical protection, security during transport and the ability to recover lost radioactive materials. It said: “The nuclear security summits have had a positive effect, but the strategic goal of developing an effective global nuclear security system remains unachieved.”

Kuznick estimates that on Obama’s watch little more than a ton of nuclear materials has been removed – which still leaves 500 tons of plutonium and 1,300 tons of highly enriched uranium. Of countries that eliminated potential weapons-grade material, he added, some still have nuclear weapons on their soil. “If we want to say this is the best thing that came out of Obama’s Prague speech then I think it’s very disappointing,” he said.

“Any even small step in the direction of securing these highly dangerous materials is a step in the right direction and worth taking. But in the broader spectrum of the entire nuclear threat, the steps have been relatively minor.”

On that day seven years ago in the Czech capital, Obama declared that as the only country to have ever used a nuclear weapon, the US has a moral responsibility to act. “To put an end to cold war thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy, and urge others to do the same,” he pledged.

Yet the Nobel peace prize winner has since laid out plans to modernise the US nuclear arsenal over the next 30 years at a potential cost of nearly $1tn. Kuznick said: “I applaud Obama for what he’s trying to do but I think he sends such mixed messages that he undercuts the moral authority of what we’re doing. It’s the height of hypocrisy.”

Other commentators, however, suggest that Obama’s record compares favourably with other nuclear powers such as Russia, Pakistan and Israel. Jim Walsh, research associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s security studies programme, said: “He deserves credit among the nuclear weapons states for being a leader trying to move things in the right direction. You can’t say that about anybody else.”

Assessing the legacy of the Prague speech, Walsh added: “Would you like to have cleared up all the nuclear materials? Of course. Was it realistic? Of course not. But we got a new start.”

Whoever succeeds Obama – and the prospect of Donald Trump gaining access to the nuclear codes fills some with dread – it is very possible that the issue will be less of a diplomatic priority for the next president. Walsh added: “I’m a fan of the summit process but over time the momentum has slowed. Among those attending there’s a bittersweet feeling this may be the last one for a while. It’s hard to build an international regime in six to eight years.”

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

http://blog.ifeng.com/article/44126734.html?touping



俄罗斯新型洲际导弹中国造不了美国反导拦不住
高峰 06:31
凤凰博报邀请你免费去台湾

根据公开资料分析，目前担任俄战略核力量值班的陆基洲际弹道导弹导弹有7种：公路机动部署的RS-12M “白杨”、RS-12M2“白杨-M”以及较新的RS-24“亚尔斯”；固定井式部署的RS-18、RS-20“撒旦”、“白杨-M”和RS-24“亚尔斯”。军事评论员高峰指出，俄罗斯除了上述导弹的保有部署之外，还在发展两款新型洲际导弹。


去年3月18日俄战略火箭兵在阿斯特拉罕州卡普斯京亚尔靶场成功试射了新型洲际弹道导弹“边界”，准确命中位于哈萨克斯坦境内萨雷-沙甘靶场内的目标，这是该导弹第四次成功试射。“边界”导弹的编号为RS-26，RS-26“边界”已经进行了5次试射，其中成功4次，预计俄罗斯将于明年开始部署这种新导弹。
美国观察家认为，RS-26“边界”导弹的设计射程不会超过5500公里，应该属于中短程弹道导弹（RSMD）。但是该导弹在2011年的首次试射路径是从普列谢茨克到勘察加半岛靶场的，这就已经充分证明了该导弹拥有洲际打击能力。军事评论员高峰称，俄军RS-26“边界”导弹的特质并不在于射程，而是其采用新型分导式多弹头战斗部，在与弹体分离后能以不可预测的飞行轨迹进行机动。

俄媒最新披露消息称，RS-26“边界”导弹是RS-24“亚尔斯”的改进型，该导弹的飞行距离能够达到1.1万公里能够击中美国境内的设施。有中国军事专家在电视节目中称“这款新导弹独一无二，令他国军队惊讶。RS-26能在飞行时不断变轨。这种武器是世界其他军队没有的。就不用考虑反导系统了，因为它对RS-26导弹根本束手无策”。
相比RS-24“亚尔斯”导弹，RS-26“边界”导弹使用了高强度聚合材料，令导弹重量大幅下降，从“亚尔斯”的120吨减至80吨（不是美国之前猜测的60吨），四个分导式核战斗部的总威力却达到120万吨当量。另外，RS-26具备快速发射能力，该导弹发射助推阶段不超过5分钟，使北约在其周边部署的地面监控设施无法实施有效的定位跟踪。
俄战略火箭兵司令谢尔盖·卡拉卡耶夫表示，新的洲际弹道导弹将于2016年开始服役。届时RS-26 “边界”导弹将作为“白杨-M”和“亚尔斯”的补充，并替换逐渐落后的RS-18导弹。据称RS-26会首先配备位于伊尔库茨克的近卫第29导弹师。
军事评论员高峰指出，除了RS-26“边界”导弹之外，需要关注的还有另一款超级杀手---“萨尔玛特人”重型洲际弹道导弹，因为它将搭载俄罗斯的超音速武器战斗部。按照俄罗斯战略火箭军的发展规划，“萨尔玛特人”重型洲际弹道导弹未来将替代大名鼎鼎的RS-20“撒旦”洲际导弹。

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

http://t.m.china.com.cn/convert/c_l3ePGN.html


俄"钟情"液体洲际导弹 "萨尔玛特"将于2017年试验

来源: 中国网 *|* 2015-01-12 09:53


SS-18“撒旦”洲际导弹发射试验 资料图
据美国导弹威胁网2014年12月27日报道，俄罗斯100吨级的“萨尔玛特”重型弹道导弹将在俄联邦战略导弹部队的七个团服役。这些部队是俄战略核力量的地基组成部分，是俄联邦武装力量的独立兵种。据俄媒报道，“萨尔玛特”导弹将在俄克拉斯诺亚尔斯克地区和奥伦堡州部署，在2017年年底进行试验。该导弹将能突破几乎任何的反导系统，并取代“总督”洲际弹道导弹（Voevoda，北约代号SS-18 “撒旦”）。据悉，俄罗斯研制“萨尔玛特”导弹是为了应对美国的“全球快速打击”项目。
冷战催生的苏联SS-18重型洲际导弹
上世纪60年代中期，冷战开始进入白热化阶段，在“确保相互摧毁”战略思想指导下，美苏两国将拥有完全摧毁对方的能力作为遏制战争的前提，走上了全面的核军备竞赛。因此，美苏部署了大量战略导弹，同时，两国又开始考虑自身核武器的安全性，进而发展射程更远、当量更大、分导式弹头更多的坚固地下井发射的导弹核武器。当时，“民兵”导弹的部署和改进使美国在军备竞赛中占据了先机，这在冷战的严酷气氛中是决不允许的，于是苏联在60年代末开始发展第四代陆基核导弹SS-18“撒旦”导弹。
当时，苏联国内有人提出了“还击—迎击”思想，即核打击应在来袭导弹离开敌人发射装置但还未到达苏联领土之时进行。这一思想不要求对导弹发射井进行抵御核爆炸的特别加固，从而降低了部署成本。但乌特金和其导师扬格利认为，应该从最不利的情况出发，侧重报复性的“还击”，发展抗打击能力高的大威力洲际弹道导弹。这一思想得到了时任苏联国防部长的乌斯季诺夫的支持，为此苏联战略火箭军提出了分导式弹头、竖井冷发射的要求。
SS-18被设计为携带分导式多弹头或单弹头的二级导弹，采用了更先进的技术和更紧凑的配置，使导弹结构重量减轻。1971年苏联开始SS-18的冷发射演练。1973年2月成功进行全程飞行试验，1975年12月SS-18导弹正式装备部队。初期服役的SS-18为单弹头，以后又增加了多弹头型和大威力单弹头型，分别命名为SS-18 I、II、III型。早期型SS-18采用自主惯性制导系统，精度不是很高，即使是多弹头也要求具备较大威力，才能打击加固发射井等硬目标，而威力提高意味着弹头重量的增加，这使其携带的弹头数最多只能有8个。科学家经过计算发现，提高精度比提高威力的效果要好的多。为此，苏联开始着手改进SS-18。
SS-18导弹前三个型号服役才过了几个月，苏联就在1976年8月16日通过了IV型的改进决议。南方设计局的改进方案采用了平台-计算机显示制导方案，使弹头打击精度由500米以上缩小到了350米以内，这使SS-18可用更小的弹头打击同样的目标，从而增加了携带的弹头数，使得设计方案中子弹头数量由8个增加到10个。1980年SS-18IV开始服役。1982-1983年，新导弹全部替代早期部署的三种导弹，部署总数达到308枚，达到了《美苏关于限制进攻性武器条约》规定的上限。
性能超前的“萨尔玛特”新型液体洲际导弹
一直以来，人们普遍认为固体导弹比液体导弹好，俄罗斯为何要反其道而行，重新研制液体导弹呢？其实，液体导弹也并非一无是处。据介绍，这种使用液体燃料的新型导弹——“萨尔玛特”性能远超前代产品“撒旦”，生存能力也因发射装置防御能力增强和采用多种主、被动防御措施而大大提高。其实俄罗斯早就开始酝酿研制新型重型液体洲际弹道导弹替代日渐老化的SS-18导弹。
2009年底，俄战略火箭兵司令什瓦琴中将宣布，俄罗斯将研制新型重型液体洲际导弹，以替换即将退役的SS-18、SS-19。随后不久，马克耶夫国家导弹中心、俄罗斯通用机械设计集团（原来的礼炮设计局，SS-19设计方）等单位开始新型导弹的预研工作，并参加项目竞标。2011年初，该项目竞标结束，马克耶夫国家导弹中心的方案脱颖而出。同年，俄国防部副部长波波夫金表示，俄国防部已将新型液体重型洲际导弹项目列入俄联邦《2011-2020年国家武器装备计划》，预定于2016年完成导弹设计研制工作，2018年装备部队。根据《2011-2020年国家武器装备计划》，俄罗斯将为新型液体洲际导弹拨款770亿卢布，约合16亿美元。2011年4月，俄战略火箭兵前总参谋长维克托·叶欣上将曾透露，新型液体洲际导弹“萨尔马特”将会在SS-18的基础上进行深度改型升级，预计起飞重量略小于SS-18，拥有更强的突防能力，可更加有效地突破美国导弹防御系统。
根据马克耶夫国家导弹中心披露的消息，“萨尔马特”导弹可携带10个重型或者15个中型分导式核弹头，射程大于10000公里。该导弹预计将可能采用“一体两型”的设计思路，针对西欧和美国提出不同的设计方案，其中：针对美国的方案，导弹起飞重量150-200吨，射程16000公里，投掷重量达8吨，略高于SS-18；针对欧洲的方案，导弹射程9000公里，起飞重量100-120吨，投掷重量5吨。两种设计都采用了分导式核弹头。
据介绍，“萨尔马特”将采用井基冷发射方式，发射时先用火药蓄压器将导弹弹射到发射井上方20-30米左右高度，然后导弹自行点火起飞。“萨尔玛特”将采用新型惯导+星光制导+卫星制导的复合制导方式，其分导式核弹头的打击精度比SS-18更高，预计在250米左右。在导弹突防能力方面，由于导弹的投掷重量有所增加，其可配备种类齐全、数量更多的诱饵，突防能力凸显。
俄罗斯缘何“钟情”液体洲际导弹？
根据采用推进器的不同，洲际导弹可分为固体洲际导弹和液体洲际导弹。与液体洲际导弹相比，固体洲际导弹具有体积小、反应时间短等优点，其生存能力和快速反击能力都有较大优势，洲际导弹固体化已经成为洲际导弹的重要发展趋势之一。既然如此，为何俄罗斯还要再次发展液体洲际导弹?
原因是多种多样的，从液体洲际导弹本身性能看，与采用固体火箭发动机的导弹相比，液体火箭发动机具有比冲高的优点，其单位重量推进剂产生的推力更大，导弹的射程更远、投掷重量更大。以液体推进的SS-18导弹为例，其最大射程16000公里，投掷重量高达7吨，可携带10枚50万吨TNT当量的核弹头。此外，投掷重量大带来的另一个好处是可携带种类完善的诱饵，提高了导弹的突防能力。
另一方面，美国加紧部署导弹防御系统与俄罗斯核力量的日益衰弱是俄研制液体洲际导弹的重要原因。当前，俄罗斯的核武库已经到了更新换代期，原有的大量核导弹濒临退役，而新研制的核导弹还没有跟上装备。因此，俄罗斯适时对外宣布推出新型液体洲际导弹，等于是向美国传达一个信号，即“俄罗斯的核威慑能力还在”。
最后，俄罗斯现役新型洲际导弹大多使用固体燃料，威慑略显不足。以“亚尔斯”为例，其投掷重量不超过1.5吨，只能携带3个分弹头，而 “白杨”M则只能携带单弹头。相比之下，美国上世纪90年代就研制了投掷重量达3.2吨的MX固体洲际导弹。
因此，液体洲际导弹技术成熟，研发难度小，生产成本低，加上苏/俄液体洲际导弹技术一直走在世界先进前列，俄罗斯在此时重新研制液体洲际导弹也就不足为奇了。俄罗斯认为将来固体燃料洲际弹道导弹的威力也许还不足以打破美国的反导系统，因此可由重型液体燃料洲际弹道导弹来对抗。如果美国不放弃自己的计划，则可用这种导弹制造出射程几乎可覆盖全球的非核高精度战略武器。
俄罗斯未来陆基洲际导弹将“新秀”频出
据俄罗斯卫星网2015年1月4日报道，未来，俄罗斯“核盾牌”将添新装备。预计，俄罗斯2016年将增添RS-26固体燃料洲际弹道导弹；2018年前俄罗斯将完成研制“巴尔古津”铁路基导弹，2020年前完成研制液体燃料洲际弹道导弹“萨尔马特”。
事实上，至今仍无关于新导弹RS-26的正式消息。这一导弹的性能特点目前还处于被保密之中，仅有的消息是，这是一款俄罗斯研发的、采用固体燃料的最新型洲际弹道导弹。自2013年以来，关于这一导弹试射的信息从未被更新过，据悉当时进行了四次发射，其中三次获得成功。俄罗斯战略导弹部队司令卡拉卡耶夫表示，目前RS-26的实验仍在继续，明年将完成，而2016年起导弹将进入战斗值勤。
俄罗斯从未透露过关于新型液体燃料洲际弹道导弹“萨尔马特”的部署地。俄计划于2020年前制成这一新导弹，以取代现有装备的“总督”洲际弹道导弹。据悉，这一导弹将被用于对抗发展中的美国全球导弹防御系统。卡拉卡耶夫表示，“按照我们的计划，这款重型导弹将部署在乌茹尔（克拉斯诺亚尔斯克边疆区）和栋巴罗夫斯基镇（奥伦堡州）”。
据俄国防工业领域消息人士透露，铁路基导弹的项目草图已完成，目前正在研究设计文件，而企业方面已在尽全力赶制试验样机。预计，2018年前俄罗斯将完成研制“巴尔古津”铁路基导弹。早在苏联时期，铁路基导弹就已被列装入战略导弹部队编队，但由于1993年的《第二阶段削减战略武器条约》，俄罗斯于2005年不得不放弃这一导弹。而《第三阶段削减战略武器条约》没有规定限制研发新型导弹，包括铁路基导弹。俄罗斯国防部副部长安东诺夫表示，俄研发新型铁路基导弹不需要重审关于削减战略武器条约。
预计，这款新型导弹将于2040年前列装入俄罗斯战略导弹部队战斗编队。如此一来，俄罗斯战略导弹部队将重新拥有集井基、公路机动和铁路机动三种型式弹道导弹。另外，明年俄罗斯战略导弹部队还将接装超过20多枚“亚尔斯”的井基和公路机动战略导弹。（谢武）
查

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

http://xw.qq.com/news/20151118023900



俄军准备试射最强洲际导弹
2015-11-18 10:06:01环球时报 36 大字

　　资料图：俄罗斯现役的发射井重型洲际导弹是SS-18撒旦

　　资料图：RS-24亚尔斯洲际弹道导弹
　　原标题：俄准备试射最强洲际导弹 美军反导系统防不住
　　据俄塔社17日报道，俄军工综合体人士透露，被克里姆林宫寄予厚望的新一代“萨尔马特”重型洲际导弹将于2016年第三季度进行试射，原型弹的组装工作将于2016年春夏之交在普列谢茨克航天中心完成。报道称，相关机构正在紧锣密鼓地准备这种俄罗斯史上最强洲际导弹的发射工作。尽管新导弹试射的时间已比原计划推迟数月，但正式服役时间没有改变，还是2018年底。
　　消息人士称，克拉斯诺亚尔斯克机械制造厂负责“萨尔马特”导弹的生产工作，所有元器件均在俄罗斯国内解决，这意味着自苏联时代以来乌克兰南方机械厂对重型洲际导弹的技术垄断将被打破。“萨尔马特”导弹将于2016年3月先在普列谢茨克进行模拟井下“冷发射”试验，7-8月进行正式飞行测试。如果一切顺利，俄罗斯将不再进行更多的重复试验，从而加速导弹的列装过程。
　　RS-28“萨尔马特”的北约代号为SS-X-30，是一种重型液体燃料陆基洲际导弹。俄国防部副部长尤里·鲍里索夫透露，“萨尔马特”总重达到100吨，长度超过35米，弹头重约10吨，能携带10-15枚分导核弹头，射程超过1.1万公里。这种导弹不仅对飞行轨迹进行优化设计，而且能让分导弹头从不同方向发起攻击，包括绕过南极实施核打击，性能远超上一代产品SS-18“撒旦”。
　　俄罗斯《技术与武器》杂志称，“萨尔马特”导弹号称能突破任何反导系统，甚至能应对使用常规弹头的美国“全球快速打击系统”。但它却采用维护保养频繁而复杂的液体燃料，着实让人费解。俄社会政治研究中心主任弗拉基米尔·叶夫谢耶夫道出其中真谛，原来俄军现役的50枚使用液体燃料的SS-18导弹已建有发射井、指挥室、存储维护设施、通信和道路运输等庞大的基础设施，价值甚至超过导弹本身，“萨尔马特”继续利用这些技术和设施，能够节省大量资金。况且液体燃料导弹可搭载10枚以上的分弹头，而俄军现役最先进的RS-24“亚尔斯”固体燃料导弹只能携带3枚分弹头，这就大大提高了导弹突防能力。
　　另外，负责研制“萨尔马特”的俄罗斯马克耶夫国家导弹中心宣称，他们拥有最先进的液体燃料技术和经验，液体燃料加注进导弹后可以长时间保存，战备能力不亚于固体燃料，因此不影响导弹的实际威慑能力。

 

[harimau]

Few pieces only for show again?

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

http://www.lexue163.com/v_801_XF1TH5a0uuIk.html



http://wapbaike.baidu.com/item/RS-28“萨尔马特”重型洲际导弹?adapt=1


RS-28“萨尔马特”重型洲际导弹
语音播报，能听的百科！ 立即收听
РС-26（英文：RS-28，“Сармат，萨尔玛特）”重型洲际弹道导弹，北约代号SS-X-30，是俄罗斯正在研发的战略武器，于2015年开始投放实验，预计于2017进行发射试验。
中文名称
“萨尔玛特”重型洲际弹道导弹
英文名称
RS-28（SS-X-30）"Sarmat"
前型/级
Р-36М2 “总督”/北约代号SS-18mod5/6“撒旦”
次型/级
无
研制时间
2009
发展沿革
2009年底，俄罗斯战略火箭兵司令什瓦琴中将宣布，俄罗斯将研制新型重型液体洲际导弹，以替换即将退役的SS-18、SS-19。随后不久，马克耶夫国家导弹中心、俄罗斯通用机械设计集团（礼炮设计局等组成）等单位开始新型导弹的预研工作，并参加项目竞标。2011年初，该项目竞标结束，马克耶夫国家导弹中心的方案脱颖而出。同年，俄国防部副部长波波夫金表示，俄国防部已将新型液体重型洲际导弹项目列入俄联邦《2011-2020年国家武器装备计划》，预定于2016年完成导弹设计研制工作，2018年装备部队。根据《2011-2020年国家武器装备计划》，俄罗斯将为新型液体洲际导弹拨款770亿卢布，约合16亿美元。2011年4月，俄战略火箭兵前总参谋长维克托·叶欣上将曾透露，新型液体洲际导弹“萨尔马特”将会在SS-18的基础上进行深度改型升级，预计起飞重量略小于SS-18，但拥有更强的突防能力和投送能力，可更加有效地突破美国导弹防御系统。
技术特点
根据采用推进器的不同，洲际导弹可分为固体洲际导弹和液体洲际导弹。
与液体洲际导弹相比，固体洲际导弹具有体积小、反应时间短等优点，其生存能力和快速反击能力都有较大优势。
性能数据
而与采用固体火箭发动机的导弹相比，液体火箭发动机具有比冲高的优点，其单位重量推进剂产生的推力更大。导弹的射程更远、投掷重量更大。
以液体推进的SS-18mod5/6导弹为例，其最大射程16000公里，投掷重量接近9吨，可携带10枚75万吨TNT当量的核弹头，或者2000万吨级单弹头，额外的盈余则可携带种类完善的诱饵，SS-18最多能携带超过40个诱饵，从而大大提高了导弹的突防能力。
服役事件
根据马克耶夫国家导弹中心披露的消息，“萨尔马特”导弹可携带10个重型或者15个中型分导式核弹头，射程大于10000公里。
该导弹可能采用“一体两型”的设计思路，针对西欧和美国提出不同的设计方案。
总体评价
降频型号用于对欧洲目标发动攻击，采用两级液体火箭构型。而针对美国本土的标准型号则为三级构型，具备将10吨荷载从极地送达美国本土。

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

The Progess is far ahead of original schedule, supposed to test launch in 2017, but already done, months ago.






http://russia-insider.com/en/military/russia-rolls-out-super-missile/ri11225



Search



Russia Insider ? Military
Russia Rolls Out Super Missile, Russian Nuke Tech Now Decades Ahead of US
The giant new Sarmat liquid fueled ICBM able to smash through any missile defense shield is now ready for testing

Daniel Fielding Tue, Nov 17 | 22,646 53
Donate!
3.65k
Shares
3.61k
22
1


Russia's giant Voevoda ICBM - to be replaced by the new Sarmat
Russia has announced that its next heavy ICBM (“intercontinental ballistic missile”) is ready for testing.

Very little is known about the missile other than that it is liquid fuelled and bigger than every other ICBM in existence save for the one it replaces - the gigantic R36M, which NATO calls “Satan” but which the Russians call Voevoda.

You can see a film of Russian soldiers launching the Voevoda here.

Though the new missile - called the Sarmat - is believed to be smaller than the Voevoda, it will be at least as powerful.* This is because it benefits from the huge advances in materials and liquid fuels since the Voevoda was designed in the 1960s.

Whilst the new missile capabilities are unknown, there are rumours that it will use a hypersonic warhead or warheads - making it capable of defeating all defences.

The single most impressive thing about the new missile is the speed of its development,

Development was launched in 2009 - just 6 years ago - and it is already ready for testing.* This is despite the fact that the Soviet factory that previously built the USSR’s land based liquid fuelled ICBMs is lost to Russia since it is located in Dnepropetrovsk in Ukraine.

In other words the Russians have developed a new production facility - in the Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk where sea launched missiles were previously produced - and produced a prototype ready for testing in just 6 years.

The new Sarmat missile will take its place alongside the smaller and less powerful road mobile solid fuelled ICBMs like the Yars that Russia has been building since the start of the century.* There are now plans to install a variant of the Yars on railway carriages.

In addition, after a troubled development history, Russia’s new sea launched ICBM, the Bulava, is now in full operational service on board Russia’s Borei class submarines.

That means that Russia has three new ICBM systems in production or advanced development:

The Yars land mobile solid fuel ICBM

The Bulava mixed fuel sea launched ICBM

The heavy Sarmat liquid fuelled ICBM

By contrast the US’s current land based ICBM - the Minuteman III - dates from the 1960s, and its sea launched ICBM - the Trident II - dates from the 1980s.

Donate!
3.65k
Shares
3.61k
22
1


DID YOU ENJOY THIS ARTICLE? - CONSIDER HELPING US!
Russia Insider depends on your donations: the more you give, the more we can do.
$100
$50
$25
Other amount
ON FIRE
Hillary Clinton Explained in One Picture - America is Waking Up
Ben Garrison 15,056
Russian Jets Feint a Strafing Run on a US Destroyer. Americans Feint Shock and Horror (Video)
Mark Nicholas 11,554
Allies and Enemies: Why The Syrian Coalition is Winning
Federico Pieraccini 11,346
PAST ARTICLES WE REALLY LIKE

Click here to see complete list
Hillary Clinton Mocks Putin, Gladly Accepts $500K in Jewels from Head-Chopping Saudi Dictator
Riley Waggaman 5 Mar 2016 34,060 127
Crimea Was One of The Great Heroic Battles of WW2. The West Seems Ignorant of This
Alevtina Rea Apr 2015 5,495 34
Excellent New Russian MH17 Documentary: Ukraine and West Are Guilty (Video)
(RT) Jul 2015 10,214 56
Top German Editor: CIA Bribing Journalists
Oct 2014 41,961 47
Ukraine: Such a Disappointment for a Girl
Patrick Armstrong Aug 2015 4,997 40
**by Taboola*Sponsored Links*YOU MAY LIKE
Why Singaporeans Are Not Well Prepared For Retirement
Ace Profits Academy
10 Things Every Traveller to Perth Must Experience
Tourism Australia
How This Singaporean Mom Becomes An Investing Superstar
Wealth Nation
30 Drinks & Snacks to Buy at Daiso
HungryGoWhere SG

ARTICLES BY AUTHOR
Putin's Billions: Mystery Solved - They Don't Exist
Yatsenyuk Goes - Finally!
Russia Versus ISIS: Russia Brings on the KA52 Attack Helicopter
Ukraine's Government Crisis Comes to a Head
Fighting in Nagorno Karabakh: A Headache for Moscow
All articles
RELATED ARTICLES

Russia Has A Badass Navy MILITARY WATCH Federico Pieraccini 11,845 6

Is Kiev Wildly Understating Combat Deaths? BREAKING STORY Charles Bausman 12,615 12

What Ceasefire? Ferocious Fighting in Donetsk Inflicts Heavy Civilian Casualties WAR UPDATE Graham Phillips (Radio excerpt) 1,654 1

The EU Should Send In Peacekeepers, Or Else the Ceasefire Might Not Hold OPINION Dmitri Trenin (Carnegie Moscow Center) 2,036 26


JOIN US! |ABOUT|CONTACT|INVESTORS|CROWDFUNDING|RSS
Copyright © 2016 Russia Insider
Russia Insider uses cookies on this site to enhance your user experience.
By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.
OK, I agree No, give me more info

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

Few pieces only for show again?

Few dozen of such giant ICBMs actually would be made [hopefully also being used for nuking USA NATO], not for show. Not more than 100 such largest ICBM will be necessary, each @ 10~15 warheads, 40 such ICBMs can take care of 500 targets already.

Putin got so many other models of ICBMs SLBMs, cruise missiles w nuke warheads. These others are smaller than SAMAT, but much more in numbers. SAMAT are inside fortified nuke defendable silos underground. Other nukes, are inside nuke subs, like Borei class, got 20 SLBMs inside @ 10 nuke MIRV warheads, there are half dozen of such subs. Can take out 1200 targets.

There are hundreds of truck launched and railroad train launched ICBMs like YARS TOPOL-M etc. Can take care of hundreds more targets.

There are many more cruise missiles w nuke tips, lanched from strategic bombers like TU-160, TU-22, from warships, and from smaller subs than Borei class. Can take care of thousands more targets.

There are short-ranged and mid-ranged missiles like famous Iskanda, can fire tactical nuke warheads. Not so big like ICBMs.

There are nuke torpedoes mainly for destruction of US NATO nuke subs mainly the Ohio class, and US aircraft carriers.

There are still some nuke bombs alike smart guided bombs, just nuke tips, to pick off some high value tactical targets. Bombers need to fly almost above target to attack, but can be Sukhoi fighter bombers types, no necessary to be heavy strategic heavy long range bombers like Tupolevs.

 

[johnny333]

Why waste $$$ on more nuclear weapons when there are already enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world a couple of hundred times.

The world doesn't need people like Putin, an ex-KGB crook who enriches himself at the expense of the state. Sporeans are not the only idiots of this world, there are also stupid Russians who support Putin.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

Itbis all worthwhile when these powerful good weapons get ALL USED ASAP, to reduce excessively over-population to a tiny population, compatible with amount of resources still remaining on this planet, and reduce consumption level, and reduce destructive pollution discharge, all to level below what the planet earth's natural ability could recover gradually.

That saves a future of human existence and a planet ecology that many other spicies got chance to evade total extinction caused by man.

Arms race is going on, the are defence being developed to intercept nukes, so delivery of nukes needs upgrading to penetrate these defence. Prevent successful interception, and ensure targets gets the nuke properly. It's important to nuke away high pollution cities especially those of high living standard, high consumption of resources.

Important to nuke away first on the list, those Ang Moh idiots, who inisist and force-selling flase humanity values, leading to unlimited SQUANDERRING of resources, to develope, grow, and pamper a huge global population. Calling it PEACE, FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, HUMANITY, and blindly disregrad the TOTAL EXTINCTION they are CAUSING on this planet.

Why waste $$$ on more nuclear weapons when there are already enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world a couple of hundred times.

The world doesn't need people like Putin, an ex-KGB crook who enriches himself at the expense of the state. Sporeans are not the only idiots of this world, there are also stupid Russians who support Putin.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

[video=youtube_share;ATHhsrH16VQ]https://youtu.be/ATHhsrH16VQ[/video]

My favorite nuke from Putin is this not very big one, but very useful very effective. Can have a lot hidden everywhere, even right with USA NATO territories, unknowingly.

Why they are good is they are undefendable nasty surprises. Their effectiveness and shock levels are 10000X more than 911.



http://dailysignal.com/2011/08/22/the-club-k-a-deadly-%E2%80%9Cpandora%E2%80%99s-box%E2%80%9D-of-cruise-missiles/


The Club-K: A Deadly “Pandora’s Box” of Cruise Missiles
Lajos F. Szaszdi / August 22, 2011 / 2 comments

Russia’s military-industrial complex is offering an ominous weapons system in the international arms market called the Club-K cruise missile system. It consists of a quadruple launcher for Club cruise missiles hidden inside an innocuous-looking cargo container that serves as cover for the missiles’ Transporter-Erector-Launcher (TEL) and the control cabin, where two operators would handle the satellite communications and the missiles’ targeting and launching. The Club missiles are known by NATO as the SS-N-27 “Sizzler.”

Fittingly, the marketing name given to the system is “Pandora’s Box.” The container-looking weapon system can be fired from a container ship, a train cart, or a container truck. By appearing externally as a simple container, the Club-K can be positioned covertly, ready to unleash a surprise attack, probably firing simultaneously from more than one container.

The Club-K missiles have satellite navigation, which currently would utilize the U.S. GPS and the Russian GLONASS systems, and possibly also China’s Beidou 2 system and Europe’s Galileo in the future. According to the Club-K promotional video, targeting coordinates would be provided from space by a satellite, but these could also be supplied by airborne platforms.

The warheads of the Club-K missiles might not be exclusively conventional. According to Jane’s, the Club missiles are analogous to the Soviet RK-55 cruise missile, which was designed to carry *a 200-kiloton nuclear warhead. The SS-N-27A land-attack missile could also be armed with a high-power generator used as an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapon or E-Bomb.

The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage Foundation.* We’ll respect your inbox and keep you informed.

Sign Up
Container ships carrying the Club-K system could be used to attack commercial shipping, particularly in choke points like the Straits of Hormuz and Malacca. These container ships would be acting like Germany’s auxiliary cruisers of the First and Second World Wars, which were armed merchant ships used for commerce raiding. Cargo ships armed with the Club-K could be equipped with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to provide airborne Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR).

Even though use by Hezbollah is a possibility, the greatest potential threat could come from China, which reportedly was already interested in acquiring Club missiles for its submarines of the Type 041 Yuan class, the nuclear-powered Type 093 Shang class, and Russian-made Kilo class subs. China could load container ships with land-attack missiles, with E-Bombs for a surprise attack against Taiwan, and armed with nuclear warheads and E-Bombs to strike the port facilities used by the U.S. Navy in Singapore, the U.S. West Coast, the Panama Canal, etc. Chinese missiles could be launched from container trucks sent secretly to Mexico mixed with legitimate containers. India, another customer of the SS-N-27, could use the Club-K system against Pakistan or China as a first or second strike weapon. Iran could be another customer for the Club-K, once U.N. sanctions are lifted.

The Club-K is a highly destabilizing weapon system. Due to the nature of international trade, with millions of containers being shipped worldwide, transported by train and particularly by trucks, it would be very hard to detect, and an attack could happen at any time on any day without warning. The military and intelligence services of the U.S. and its allies must keep a close watch on this Pandora’s Box, to make sure it will never be opened in anger against them.

This is a promotional video of the Club-K.


Lajos F. Szaszdi
Sign up for our free email

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

[video=youtube_share;KEI6rnBdkEU]https://youtu.be/KEI6rnBdkEU[/video]



[video=youtube_share;XfXUROw-1i8]https://youtu.be/XfXUROw-1i8[/video]


Bravo Putin! HUAT ! AH !

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

[video=youtube_share;rGVaoF3cqe4]https://youtu.be/rGVaoF3cqe4[/video]

HUAT ! HUAT ! HUAT !

HUAT ! AH !

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

Few dozen of suc...
There are short-ranged and mid-ranged missiles like famous Iskanda, can fire tactical nuke warheads. Not so big like ICBMs.

....

Today's Moscow Ministry of Defense released a new Iskanda video:

It is basically miniaturized version of most deadly Russian ICBMs, inexpensive and light and highly mobile, can easily afford by thousands. Highly accurate and feared by USA NATO. US does not think Russia would really nuke them with their big lethally powerful top ICBMs and SLBMs, and in any case, if so nuked, there is really nothing they can do, except to hope to rise to heaven with minimum pains. However, for smaller mini-ICBMs like these, US knows the high likelihood to be hurt badly and repeatedly, and will die very slow and painful death, after a series of long painful wars - no immediate grand total game-over within 30mins like SAMAT.



https://www.rt.com/in-motion/340041-russian-iskander-rocket-test/


Home
In motion

Where to watch
Schedule

2
Published time: 18 Apr, 2016 11:36
RAW: Video of Russian Iskander-M missile successful test-firing released

COURTESY: RT's RUPTLY video agency, NO RE-UPLOAD, NO REUSE - FOR LICENSING, PLEASE, CONTACT http://ruptly.tv

The Russian Defense Ministry has released a video of the Iskander-M tactical missile launcher test-firing a cruise rocket.

The footage was shot during an exercise at the Kapustin Yar rocket test range in the Astrakhan region on Friday last week, the ministry said in a statement


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander



9K720 Iskander
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
9K720 Iskander
SS-26 Stone
Moscow Victory Parade 2010 - Training on May 4 - img14.jpg
Russian Iskander missiles on a TEL at the 2010 Victory Day Parade rehearsal
Type Short-range ballistic missile
Place of origin Russia
Service history
In service 2006[1]-Present
Used by Russian Ground Forces
Production history
Manufacturer Votkinsk Plant State Production Association (Votkinsk) - missiles
Production Association Barricades (Volgograd) - ground equipment
KBM (Kolomna) - developer of the system
Specifications
Weight 3,800 kg (8,400 lb) for Iskander-E[2]
Length 7.3 m (24 ft)
Diameter 0.92 m (3 ft 0 in)
Warhead 480-700 kg HE fragmentation, submunition, penetration, fuel-air explosive, EMP for Iskander-E.[3][4]
Engine Single-stage solid propellant
Operational
range
500 km (250-310 miles)[5][6] for Iskander-M
280 km (170 mi) for Iskander-E
Speed 2100 m/s cruising (hypersonic)[7]
Guidance
system
Inertial guidance, optical DSMAC (Iskander-M), TERCOM (Iskander-K), use of GPS / GLONASS in addition to the inertial guidance system[8]
Inertial, use of GPS / GLONASS and optical DSMAC terminal homing for Iskander-E
Accuracy 5–7 m (Iskander-M)
Launch
platform
Mobile TEL

n November 2008, the Russian President Dmitry Medvedev stated in his first state of the nation speech, that Russia would deploy Iskander missiles to Russia's western district of Kaliningrad "to neutralize, if necessary, a NATO missile defense system."[28][29] On September 17, 2009, US president Barack Obama announced the cancellation of the US missile defense project in Poland and the Czech Republic.[30] Following the announcement, on September 26, Medvedev stated in a press conference that he would in turn cancel the plans to deploy Iskander missiles to Kaliningrad.[

Targets can be located not only by satellite and aircraft but also by a conventional intelligence center, by a soldier who directs artillery fire or from aerial photos scanned into a computer. The missiles can be re-targeted during flight in the case of engaging mobile targets.[9] Another unique feature of Iskander-M (and Iskander-E)[13] is the optically guided warhead, which can also be controlled by encrypted radio transmission, including such as those from AWACS or UAV. The electro-optical guidance system provides a self-homing capability. The missile's on-board computer receives images of the target, then locks onto the target with its sight and descends towards it at supersonic speed.

Boost phase thrust vector control (TVC) is accomplished by graphite vanes similar in layout to the V-2 and Scud series tactical ballistic missiles. In flight, the missile follows a quasi-ballistic path, performing evasive maneuvers in the terminal phase of flight and releasing decoys in order to penetrate missile defense systems. The missile never leaves the atmosphere as it follows a relatively flat trajectory. The missile is controlled during the whole flight with gas-dynamic and aerodynamic control surfaces. It uses a small scattering surface, special coatings and small size projections to reduce its radar signature.[14]

The Russian Iskander-M cruises at hypersonic speed of 2100–2600 m/s (Mach 6–7) at a height of 50 km. The Iskander-M weighs 4615 kg, carries a warhead of 710–800 kg, has a range of 500 km and achieves a CEP (Circular error probable) of 5–7 meters. During flight it can maneuver at different altitudes and trajectories and can turn at up to 20 to 30 G to evade anti-ballistic missiles. For example, in one of the trajectory modes it can dive at the target at 90 degrees at the rate of 700–800 m/s performing anti-ABM maneuvers.[7][15] The missile is controlled in all phases.[16]

Iskander has achieved sufficient accuracy, range and reliability (ability to penetrate defenses) to function as an alternative to precision bombing for air forces that cannot expect to launch bombing or cruise missile fire missions reliably in the face of superior enemy fighters and air defenses. Training and competence requirements are much lower than for normal air force assets such as a fighter bomber squadron utilizing guided bombs.[citation needed]

Iskander is a tactical missile system designed to be used in theater level conflicts.[17] It is intended to use conventional or nuclear warheads for the engagement of small and area targets (both moving and stationary), such as hostile fire weapons, air and antimissile defense weapons, command posts and communications nodes and troops in concentration areas, among others. The system can therefore destroy both active military units and targets to degrade the enemy's capability to wage war.

Russian language version video, at around 6:00 into video I think they showed you the nuke warhead to be mounted on missile. The metal container on the workshop floor is typical nuke warhead field shipment container of USSR style.