• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Russia threatens to wipe out the entire US with just four Satan II missiles in chilling warning over Ukraine

SBFNews

Alfrescian
Loyal
Russia threatens to wipe out the entire US with just four Satan II missiles in chilling warning over Ukraine
www.the-sun.com

A chilling moment on Russian state TV on Monday saw hosts issue the latest in a long line of threats, this time warning Putin could "destroy the entire east cost of the US" with just two missiles.

In footage from Russia's flagship propaganda show, a member of Russia's parliament boasts about the nation's military might, before also labelling 2 million Ukrainians as "incurable."

Sarmat missile test launch on April 20, 2022.

Sarmat missile test launch on April 20, 2022.Credit: East2West

The politician, Alexie Zhuravlev, was joined on the talk show by fellow MP and Russian-state mouthpiece Yevgeny Popov, the host of the Rossiya 1 channel show.

The lawmaker claimed that two of Russia's Sarmat 'Satan 2' missiles would destroy the entirety of America's east coast - before adding it would take just "two missiles for the west coast" as well.

"Four missiles and there'll be nothing left.

"They think the mushroom cloud will be taller than a high rise. That mushroom cloud will be visible from Mexico" said Zhuravlev.

Standing at the colossal height of a 14-storey tower block, the 208 ton RS-28 Sarmat missile, also known as the 'Satan 2', is capable of striking targets at almost 16,000mph.

The world-ending nuke can also carry 15 warheads and has the potential to obliterate an area the size of the UK in a single blast.

Putin-cronies have claimed the Russian military could have as many as 50 Sarmat missiles in their arsenal, and have even bizarrely threatened to use them to drown the UK in a radioactive tsunami.

Each of the Sarmat missile's 15 nuclear warheads are over 100 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in World War 2.
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin has also said that his Satan 2 missiles "can break through all modern anti-missile defences."

However, while these kinds of threats have become increasingly common on Russian propaganda shows since the invasion of Ukraine, the risk of mutually assured destruction undercuts much of the danger.

As well as threatening to wipe out the United States with their nuclear capabilities, the unsettling conversation also covered the crisis in Ukraine, as the hosts repeated the 'nazification' theme of Russia's invasion.

Describing them as "incurable," Zhuralev stated that two million Ukrainians should "be de-nazified, which means to be destroyed."

The talk show discussed a study that found 40% of Ukrainians do not support tearing down Soviet era statues in the nation, which is being carried out in some areas.

Zhuralev claimed that the 36% with "no opinion" on the matter were too afraid to share their opinion, making the case that: "three quarters of Ukrainians are against tearing down monuments, only 19 per cent support it."

"If we re-install their brains correctly, 12-15 per cent will also believe it shouldn't be done. So the maximum of 5 per cent are incurable," said the Russian lawmaker, arguing that they must be "destroyed."

The Russian military has claimed it has successfully tested its 'Satan 2' nukes

The Russian military has claimed it has successfully tested its 'Satan 2' nukesCredit: East2West
The Russian state TV talk show saw the hosts claim they could wipe out both coasts of the US with just 4 missiles

The Russian state TV talk show saw the hosts claim they could wipe out both coasts of the US with just 4 missilesCredit: East2Wes
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
We are almost getting to midnite.

Putin isn't one to be trifled with. He walks the talk when no other leader could or would.

The ball is in NATOs court.

Hug your loved ones while you still can. Mine are all at a safer location.
 

mahjongking

Alfrescian
Loyal
US shit stirrers better stop provoking these mad russians fuckers,
just need 1 mad fuck and ITE, its the end,
 

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
The one who likes to threaten is also the one that is the most fearful of being attacked. Commie countries are very renown for such tactics. Civilized countries don't practice this. Do you see Japan, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea, etc acting similarly? No.....
 

Willamshakespear

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't those guys know what they are even saying? RUS will launch 4 nukes at USA, & think USA will do nothing, sit back & be happily bombed out of existence????

The truth is that EVEN if just 1 nuke is launched, either from RUS mainland or RUS submarines which are tracked every moment, there will be FIVE nukes, pre-programmed to hit RUS mainland targets. Everyone whom hold nukes understood this policy. Thus to launch nukes, it won't be just one, sit back, have a cup of tea & then negotiate terms. There will be nothing left to negotiate, as thousands of nukes will be MULTIPLE launched at each other across continents, as none will know where each nuke will hit, so better be safe than sorry - wipe each other out pre-emptively - Mutually Aided Destruction...

There are NO winners in war. Victories are only pyrrhic when the costs - infrastructure damages, loss of precious & priceless Human lives from both sides are tabulated... The invasion in UKR had gone on long enough. It can't be won, not even on military terms. Had RUS forgotten about its own Afghan invasion quagmire in the 80s? While UKR is no match to RUS in military might, but if they just simply reorganize themselves into guerilla units, to strike at RUS targets on UKR soil - supply lines, petrol/ammo dumps, food resources, etc, it will make everyday a living hell for the RUS soldiers, whom are NOT protecting their loved ones from UKR invasions, but they themselves are attacking UKR, wondering at WHO they are actually sacrificing their precious lives for.

Furthermore, as the RUS defense ministry will never reveal the reasons why & where the RUS soldiers were captured or dead, if UKR was smart, instead of berating RUS families but sending ID cards of the captured or dead to RUS families who are in need of closure, will appreciate UKR & understand their plight in this unnecessary invasion, & win RUS families over to their side.

RUS thought it holds the cards, with an ace in its gas & wheat supplies. The latest is that Humankind has no need for it & will find other alternatives. Those who use RUS products - gas, wheat, etc, faces international sanctions even for their exports. Already long hit with sanctions for its Crimea seizure, it's economy was in tatters, and now it will only be worse, from all fronts.

It is over.

May President Putin arrest those who proposed & supported for invasion & be tried for Treason. UKR can be won, into RUS sphere of influence, but invasion had only removed any chance of it happening, & had been a costly event. It is time to call in the Swiss, well known to be neutral & honest brokers of peace, to try to find some pragmatic negotiated way to save the situation & ease the sanctions, & for RUS to progress & evolve...
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
www. the-sun.com

LOL, it's the muckraking anti-Brexit fake news clickbait merchants from the UK again.

When they are not fabricating crap about football clubs, 'muh Russia' is their Plan B these days. :biggrin:
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are NO winners in war. Victories are only pyrrhic when the costs - infrastructure damages, loss of precious & priceless Human lives from both sides are tabulated... The invasion in UKR had gone on long enough. It can't be won, not even on military terms. Had RUS forgotten about its own Afghan invasion quagmire in the 80s? While UKR is no match to RUS in military might, but if they just simply reorganize themselves into guerilla units, to strike at RUS targets on UKR soil - supply lines, petrol/ammo dumps, food resources, etc, it will make everyday a living hell for the RUS soldiers, whom are NOT protecting their loved ones from UKR invasions, but they themselves are attacking UKR, wondering at WHO they are actually sacrificing their precious lives for.
Ukraine is different. 50% of the country are Russian. .
During a free election, a russian end up being president as they form a slight majority.
The illegal revolt and coup in 2014 changed all that. From then on, there was no free and fair elections held.
Current Ukraine gomen unable to stop their civil war and their russuan speakers are tormented and subjugated.by nazis.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
May President Putin arrest those who proposed & supported for invasion & be tried for Treason. UKR can be won, into RUS sphere of influence, but invasion had only removed any chance of it happening, & had been a costly event.
If you understood the typical Russkie psyche, I wouldn’t expect Putin to call for a truce- the average Russkies wouldn’t even call it an abang-adik relationship between themselves and Ukrainians, the labelling of Ukrainians as “hohol“ didn’t happen for nothing :frown::frown::frown:

That said, I sincerely hope and pray the slavic brotherhood can truly be restored and mended, by which method and when? I haven’t the faintest clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jw5

Willamshakespear

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are NO winners in any war, more so when attacks bear no justifiable reasons or mere mealy-mouthed excuses to hide a leader's or elite groups self interests based upon weak Human emotions of pride, greed, lust, etc & especially stupidities.

President Putin himself was a prideful KGB agent back in the 80s, & for all his patriotism & efforts to further the proven misguided communist ideals which had led RUS families only into poverty even today, he & many others failed to change the course of the war in the RUS invasion in Afghanistan in the 80s. It is incomprehensible why he allowed himself to be persuaded by fools to persist in such proven mistakes again.

The self centered elites don't fight, but it is our fellow Humans who do. RUS soldiers are courageous, & will fight to protect their loved ones, but in fighting & slaughtering UKR citizens - fellow Humans if not Slavic brothers, on sovereign UKR land whom had never attack them, whom are they protecting, they will ponder..when greater economic co-operation, Rule of law, fair justice, equality & better fair opportunities for all would had uplifted the Slavic people..

 
Last edited:

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
There are NO winners in any war, more so when attacks bear no justifiable reasons or mere mealy-mouthed excuses to hide a leader's or elite groups self interests based upon weak Human emotions of pride, greed, lust, etc & especially stupidities.
What about the arms manufacturers? :coffee::coffee::coffee:
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
The truth is that EVEN if just 1 nuke is launched, either from RUS mainland or RUS submarines which are tracked every moment, there will be FIVE nukes, pre-programmed to hit RUS mainland targets.


eh? how many active nukes operated by russkies & yankies?

for yankies to fire 5 times nuke missiles, yankees must possess 5x the no of nukes ? got?

also ever heard of yellowstone that russkies keep harping about? and san andreas faultline?
and many more russkies keep hyping up?
 

Willamshakespear

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are 8 nations that are nuclear armed, including India & Pakistan. France, UK & USA are NATO members with nukes & on sharing basis with other members.

The moment a nuke launch from an enemy State is detected, none will know for sure where it will land, as allies & enemies are many. Thus each of them will already have plans laid out - max multiple nuke launch effect by all upon the nuke launched nation. Each nuclear weapon nation do not just own 1 nuke, but thousands

Old fueds & suspicions will literally surface - others will have a go on each other & are not going to wait to be nuked, eg-India vs Pakistan

So, nuclear war is not something to joke about, or to foolishly threaten anyone with such. The consequences are M.A.D.
 

Willamshakespear

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don’t miss out the best part- the nuclear subs made sure no where is safe :coffee::coffee::coffee:
I do agree with you on nuclear armed subs. However, with our current advanced tech, we know WHERE the subs left their bases from-their origins - & where they are now, every single moment of the day, thru a variety of sensors deployed, even in the deepest part of our oceans -the Marianna Trench or even under Arctic ice. Gone are the days when subs were known as being able to 'run silent, run deep' during the 40s.

Should they attempt to launch nukes, it will be detected immediately, & its origins known, with M.A.D happening within minutes to its home origins. The sub may be left untouched as there will be no time to take action while M. A. D is happening. However, the sub will have to surface one day, usually within 6 months for resupplies, but there would have been nothing left on Earth, no home to return to, as it would had been totally nuked & irradiated. They themselves will suffer from the deadly effects of irradiation, which will last for years if not centuries, as proven by the Chernobyl disaster while under the then USSR management.

No one wins in a war, more so a nuclear war....
 
Top