- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 5,769
- Points
- 48
Unity is strength, but like anything else in this world it come at a price, not free and not cheap too.
It is my personal experience.
I paid price to work together with opposition, I won't point out which or who for this purpose, but the price is PAINFUL NEGOTIATION & SEVERE COMPROMISE IN POLITICAL STANDS. Not every party can take that and not every compromised cooperation can last long. Some times compromised cooperation can lapse, some time can be renewed, some time can not.
To see some unity, it REQUIRES and definitely called for MUTUAL compromising. Weather can be united or not really only depending on weather willing to compromise or not.
The REALITY problem is after some time into the cooperation or unity, one side or both sides will start to feel that they are unhappy to cope with compromise. They will feel that they are on the losing end of the deal. They will be unhappy to continue further. Then the compromised cooperation will lapse and they will each go their own ways.
This is why we had been seeing members and candidates moving among different parties.
There is only one clear advantage to justify the price paid for compromise, that is clearly assured victory against ruling party. Unless there is this price ASSURED, there is not enough motivation to pay the price and compromise.
Malaysian PAS & DAP compromised and moved together towards Anwar, that gave some results. But as we can see some things are falling apart after election victory. That is what I had expected.
:(
Personally I had compromised a huge amount since last GE. Some of the agreements made then already lapsed.
It is my personal experience.
I paid price to work together with opposition, I won't point out which or who for this purpose, but the price is PAINFUL NEGOTIATION & SEVERE COMPROMISE IN POLITICAL STANDS. Not every party can take that and not every compromised cooperation can last long. Some times compromised cooperation can lapse, some time can be renewed, some time can not.
To see some unity, it REQUIRES and definitely called for MUTUAL compromising. Weather can be united or not really only depending on weather willing to compromise or not.
The REALITY problem is after some time into the cooperation or unity, one side or both sides will start to feel that they are unhappy to cope with compromise. They will feel that they are on the losing end of the deal. They will be unhappy to continue further. Then the compromised cooperation will lapse and they will each go their own ways.
This is why we had been seeing members and candidates moving among different parties.
There is only one clear advantage to justify the price paid for compromise, that is clearly assured victory against ruling party. Unless there is this price ASSURED, there is not enough motivation to pay the price and compromise.
Malaysian PAS & DAP compromised and moved together towards Anwar, that gave some results. But as we can see some things are falling apart after election victory. That is what I had expected.
:(

Personally I had compromised a huge amount since last GE. Some of the agreements made then already lapsed.