- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 24,100
- Points
- 113
Hello Tony,
Being a smart person, I don't understand why u still don't comprehend the role of President of Singapore. By throwing your hat into the ring, u must know that this is a position that is neutral and that is why by law, the President must not be a member of any political party and is empowered to safeguard certain funds.
However, in the last month, u have given analysis of the GE results, speeches at the Peranakan Association, Speeches at the Chamber of commerce talking about the singapore economy, giving speech at SMU about the FT education policy, etc. Excuse me, but many of these speeches are political in nature, and defend the existing PAP policies. SInce u are supposed to be neutral, why don't u avoid these invitations? Cannot refuse the free makan? cannot refuse the honorarium fee?
Instead, if you really want to open your mouth at these events, why don't u tell us what u will do to improve our lot once u become President. What specific direction do you want to take the presidency or are u just going to do the same old same old and rubber stamp PAP policies like allowing their wage and bonus increases?
Until u do this, u sound exactly like a partisan PAP ministers talking and not like an impartial person that the role of president demands and expects. What confidence do the voters have that u will live up to the spirit of this position and the legal obligations of this position when u sound like any PAP cadre. What say u Tony?
Being a smart person, I don't understand why u still don't comprehend the role of President of Singapore. By throwing your hat into the ring, u must know that this is a position that is neutral and that is why by law, the President must not be a member of any political party and is empowered to safeguard certain funds.
However, in the last month, u have given analysis of the GE results, speeches at the Peranakan Association, Speeches at the Chamber of commerce talking about the singapore economy, giving speech at SMU about the FT education policy, etc. Excuse me, but many of these speeches are political in nature, and defend the existing PAP policies. SInce u are supposed to be neutral, why don't u avoid these invitations? Cannot refuse the free makan? cannot refuse the honorarium fee?
Instead, if you really want to open your mouth at these events, why don't u tell us what u will do to improve our lot once u become President. What specific direction do you want to take the presidency or are u just going to do the same old same old and rubber stamp PAP policies like allowing their wage and bonus increases?
Until u do this, u sound exactly like a partisan PAP ministers talking and not like an impartial person that the role of president demands and expects. What confidence do the voters have that u will live up to the spirit of this position and the legal obligations of this position when u sound like any PAP cadre. What say u Tony?
Last edited: