What has this prick done to be sue for defamation?
Who are the lawyers???????/ Huat ah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who are the lawyers???????/ Huat ah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious MANO SABNANI SUED BY OW...
- Thread starter Leckmichamarsch
- Start date
What has this prick done to be sued for defamation?
Who are the lawyers???????/ Huat ah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who are the lawyers???????/ Huat ah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
xiang lai de?
the same shit who wrote abt mrs lky flying back w re configured SIA plane n got sacked by xxx roaming in wilderness for long time going fr agm to agm for free makan asking mgmt funny questions until this GET SO MAD WITH THIS LYYLE GUJARATI. graduated in physics but nvr tained in financials!!
this scum nvr learn his lesson. Letz hope Ow strip him clean!!!!!!!!!!
Mano was my Pre-U 2 classmate. There was another by the surname Lim who probably was the son of one of then (now?) Kim Eng Securities owner; this Lim became sort of director...
Mano had a normal honest character, nothing bad I could detect then. I think he had no degree, neither in physics nor finance.
Mano became famous early. The Lim got rich early. I will become famous in the future and rich in the the hereafter !!!
Chan Rasjid.
"The Father of Unified Theory"
http://www.emc2fails.com
sounds like scroobal the shit stirrer.
MANO WROTE A BOOK THINKING IT WILL SELL LIKE hotcakes........ but TURNED OUT TO BE MUDCAKES
I don't understand what you mean by "dun bull". Mano was from the same school as Mahbubani, but years earlier, don't know how many. Do you mean you are also from the same class as Mano?
Chan Rasjid.
Sentinel100000
New Member
Serves him right!!!!! MS keeps lying on what happened at AGM!!!! Cause problems for good companies!!!!!
sibei annoying character!
he claim to be champion for minorities and ask companies the “tough Qs”
his statements show him out to have no exp in business but he still dare to tell companies what to do. if I was ex-BT editor like him, dunno where to hide my face.
even worse, he spreading “alt facts” almost as freely as donald trump and mislead the ppl he says he’s out to help.
dunno how he has gotten away with all the sh!t he’s been saying all this time. no accountability or integrity!!!
he claim to be champion for minorities and ask companies the “tough Qs”
his statements show him out to have no exp in business but he still dare to tell companies what to do. if I was ex-BT editor like him, dunno where to hide my face.
even worse, he spreading “alt facts” almost as freely as donald trump and mislead the ppl he says he’s out to help.
dunno how he has gotten away with all the sh!t he’s been saying all this time. no accountability or integrity!!!
teckhuat69
New Member
Ya lor, Mano's book is full of self flattery n lies to boost his big ego. What a waste of money spent on the crappiest of books! To make matters worse, its common knowledge he got ask companies to purchase his crappy book in BULK. If they refuse to entertain him he then starts to act like a nuisance at their shareholder meeting. Thats why he rushes from one shareholder meeting to another, even tho he only own very little shares!
Chan...............wat bs for not knowing me
Disgusting conduct....
Of course I know you, but you introduced yourself in a strange manner, and the choice of "Leckmichamarsch" seems to indicate you are Nepalese.
You started off with "dun bull" which I can't make of its meaning - you probably meant my mention that Mano was an ordinary, honest person as a classmate. Do you mean you knew him then as someone dishonest? I didn't. The posters here seems to have bad things to say about him, but we all have different "personalities"...what a big deal to brag about "I am for minorities rights" and ask "tough" questions at agm; it is after all well known that 99% business people are crooks (remember obike) - except Ma Yun. He wrote a book that may be more "original" then Kevin's "Crazy Rich Asian" - its a matter of taste. I brag that I have overturned Einstein's theory of relativity! I wrote physics papers that argued against Albert Einstein who is almost as a divinity in the physics world. Should I not then to be burnt at the stake for "heresy"! The crime of Mano is very, very much lesser! That's why I must side with him lest great misfortune befall me.
Ang Ah Bah, Its a long time ago!
Best wishes,
Chan Rasjid Kah Chew.
teckhuat69
New Member
i agree. yakuza and Mano same same. in japan the yakuza are known to disturb companies the same way, they are called 'sokaiya'.
They blackmail companies and demand payment if not they harass AGM!
Einstein's theory of relativity is proving to be more true than skeptics debunk otherwise. skeptics must now take a chill pill, eat humble pie, admit that they are wrong and do not have reliable and provable alternative answers.
https://www.space.com/41020-putting-relativity-to-the-test.html
Why Relativity's True: The Evidence for Einstein's Theory
By Paul Sutter, Astrophysicist | June 28, 2018 07:27am ET
Paul Sutter is an astrophysicist at The Ohio State University and the chief scientist at COSI science center. Sutter is also host of "Ask a Spaceman" and "Space Radio," and leads AstroTours around the world. Sutter contributed this article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
We all know and love the world's favorite theory of gravity: general relativity (GR), first cooked up by Albert Einstein himself in a magnificent feat that took seven years to complete and provided amazing insights into how the world works.
It's easy enough to state the bare essence of the theory in a couple pithy statements: "Matter and energy tell space-time how to bend, and the bending of space-time tells matter how to move." But the actual mechanics take a whopping 10 equations to describe, with each one very difficult and highly interconnected with the others.
As good skeptics, we shouldn't immediately believe this tangle of mathematics at first blush, even if it came from the brain of none other than Einstein. Instead, we need evidence. Good evidence.
A divine messenger
Out of all the features of his new theory, Einstein was proudest of its ability to explain the details of the orbit of Mercury. That innermost planet has a slightly elliptical orbit, and that ellipse ever-so-slowly rotates around the sun. In other words, the place where Mercury is farthest from the sun slowly changes with time.
If you apply simple Newtonian gravity to the sun-Mercury system, this change over time, called precession, doesn't show up — Isaac Newton's view is incomplete. Once you add in the gentle gravitational nudging and tweaking due to the other planets, almost all of the precession can be explained … but not all. By the early 1900s, it was a well-known problem in solar system dynamics, but not one that caused much controversy. Most folks just added it to the ever-growing list of "slightly weird things we can't explain about the universe" and assumed that we would find a mundane solution some day.
But Einstein wasn't most folks, and he thought Mercury was giving him a clue. When, after years of attempts, he was able to flex his general relativistic muscles and explain precisely the orbital oddities of Mercury, he knew he had finally cracked the gravitational code.
Bending light
Before Einstein put the finishing touches on the big GR, he came to some startling realizations about the nature of gravity. If you're isolated on a rocket ship that accelerates at a smooth and constant 1g — providing the same acceleration as Earth's gravity does — everything in your laboratory will behave exactly as it would on the planet's surface, Einstein reasoned. Objects will fall to the ground at the same speed as on Earth; your feet will stay firmly planted on the floor, etc.
This equivalence between gravity (as experienced on Earth) and acceleration (as experienced in the rocket) propelled (pun intended) Einstein forward to develop his theory. But hidden in that scenario is a surprising insight. Imagine a beam of light entering a window on the left side of the spaceship. By the time the light crosses the spaceship to exit, where will it be?
From the perspective of an outside observer, the answer is obvious. The light travels in a perfectly straight line, perpendicular to the path of the rocket. During the time the light was passing through, the rocket pushed itself forward. The light will then enter the rocket at one window — say, near the tip — and exit near the bottom, close to the engines.
From the inside the spacecraft, though, things seem strange. In order for the light to enter a window near the tip and exit near the engines, the beam's path has to be curved. Indeed, that's exactly what you see.
And since gravity is exactly the same as acceleration, light must follow curved paths around massive objects.
It's difficult to observe this one experimentally, because you need a lot of mass and some light that passes close to the surface to get a detectable effect. But the 1919 solar eclipse proved just the right opportunity, and an expedition led by Sir Arthur Eddington found the exact shifting of distant starlight that Einstein's nascent theory had predicted. [How a Total Solar Eclipse Helped Prove Einstein Right About Relativity]
Seeing red
Another interesting result pops out of creative thought experiments surrounding general relativity. This conclusion relies on the good old-fashioned Doppler effect, but it's applied to an unfamiliar scenario.
If something is moving away from you, the sound it produces will get stretched out, shifting down to lower frequencies — that's the Doppler effect. The same is true of light: A car moving away from you appears ever-so-slightly redder than it would be if the vehicle were stationary. (The redder light, the lower the frequency.)
Cops can take advantage of this shift by bouncing a light off your car to catch you speeding. The next time you're pulled over, you can use the opportunity to reflect on the nature of gravity.
So, if movement shifts light's wavelength, then acceleration can too: A bit of light traveling from the bottom to the top of an accelerating rocket will experience a redshift. And under GR, what goes for acceleration goes for gravity. That's right: Light emitted from the surface of the Earth will shift down into redder frequencies the farther upward it travels.
It took a few decades to conclusively demonstrate this prediction, because the effect is so tiny. But in 1959, Robert Pound and Glen Rebka proposed, designed, built and executed an experiment that enabled them to measure the redshift of light as it traveled a few stories up the Jefferson Laboratory at Harvard University.
Never stop testing
Even with all that evidence, we continue to put general relativity to the test. Any sign of a crack in Einstein's magnificent work would spark the development of a new theory of gravity, perhaps paving the way to uncovering the full quantum nature of that force. That's something we currently don't understand at all.
But in all regards, GR passes with flying colors; from sensitive satellites to gravitational lensing, from the orbits of stars around giant black holes to ripples of gravitational waves and the evolution of the universe itself, Einstein's legacy is likely to persist for quite some time.
https://www.space.com/40958-einstein-general-relativity-test-distant-galaxy.html
Einstein Was Right! Scientists Confirm General Relativity Works With Distant Galaxy
By Chelsea Gohd, Space.com Staff Writer | June 21, 2018 02:20pm ET
A new study validates Einstein's theory of general relativity in a distant galaxy for the first time.
This study supports our current understanding of gravity and provides more evidence for the existence of dark matter and dark energy — two mysterious concepts that scientists know about only indirectly by observing their effects on cosmic objects.
Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, published in 1916, explains how gravity is the result of a concept known as the fabric of space-time. Simply put, the theory predicts how much the mass of an object — in this case, a galaxy — curves space-time. [Einstein's Theory of Relativity Explained (Infographic)]
Since the theory was first published, it has been tested a number of times within our solar system. But this new study, conducted by an international team of astronomers led by Thomas Collett of the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at the University of Portsmouth in the U.K., is the first precise test of general relativity on a large astronomical scale, the researchers said.
Using data from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile, the research team found that gravity behaves the same way in a faraway galaxy as it does in our solar system — just as Einstein's theory predicts.
The researchers tested the assumption that "the same laws of physics we see working here on Earth are true anywhere else," Terry Oswalt, an astronomer and chair of physical sciences at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, said in an email to Space.com. Verifying general relativity "at all possible scales (especially the largest scale) is fundamentally important to physics as a whole, and to cosmology in particular," added Oswalt, who was not involved in the new study.
In validating general relativity, the findings also serve as additional evidence for the existence of dark matter and dark energy, Collett told Space.com. Dark matter and dark energy are two of the "weird things" that exist in the standard model of cosmology, Collett said.
The standard model is a theory which describes how fundamental forces and particles in the universe work and behave together, and it aims to explain our observations and experiments. However, our lack of understanding and explanation of dark matter and dark energy, "the two biggest mysteries in cosmology today," according to Oswalt, lead some to question the standard model.
"I doubt astronomers will be giving up the standard model of cosmology anytime soon," Oswalt said. So, instead of abandoning the standard model, researchers look to "make the models more precisely explain the observed data," he added.
In the standard model, dark matter is required to explain how fast stars orbit around galaxies and dark energy is required to explain why the universe is expanding faster, according to Collett.
Some scientists have suggested that "alternative gravity theories," as Collett described, could eliminate a need for dark matter and dark energy in the standard model. However, because this team has found that gravity functions outside our solar system like it does inside our solar system, for now it appears that our understanding of gravity is correct and dark matter and dark energy still fit in the standard model.
Collett noted that this study isn't concrete "proof" of dark matter and dark energy, but it serves as additional evidence that they exist.
To validate general relativity outside our solar system for the first time, the research team used strong gravitational lensing, a technique in which a massive object — in this case, a galaxy — acts like a huge lens by bending light so much that the image of a background object, also a galaxy, is distorted. This team of astronomers used the galaxy ESO 325-G004 because it's one of the closest lenses to Earth, only about 500 million light-years away.
If the two objects are well aligned, this effect creates a ring of images, known as an "Einstein ring," of the background galaxy. The radius of this ring "is proportional to the deflection of the light," Collett said, "so if you measure the radius of the ring, you can measure the curvature [of space-time]."
In addition to measuring the space-time curve, the researchers had to determine the galaxy's mass, because general relativity predicts how much curvature is created by a mass. They calculated this mass by measuring how fast the galaxy's stars travel. Then, by comparing this measured mass with the measured curvature of space-time, the team found what general relativity predicts for this mass, or galaxy.
So now, as far as we know, even outside our solar system, general relativity is the correct theory of gravity, Collett said. This team of astronomers hopes to study even farther galaxies and lenses, further verifying that gravity works the same throughout the cosmos.
"It is so satisfying to use the best telescopes in the world to challenge Einstein, only to find out how right he was," team member Bob Nichol, director of the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, said in a statement.
It's OK that people consider me a crackpot. That's not any big deal at all. People just have different opinions. I could also link you to articles by qualified physicists with Ph.D that categorically rejects all of Einstein's theories - special and general relativity. But do you want me to make this "lively and fun" Sammyboy forum a complete bore. Who here really cares about if Einstein is right or wrong! Posting links don't get us any nearer to the truth.
You can find at my website about 13 short papers of mine that argue the following:
1) Einstein's theory all fictitious including E=mc², special and general relativity. That implies any physics base on special relativity are invalid. Discovering gravitational waves is a total make belief - you cannot discover things predicted by a failed theory.
2) All modern high energy physics wrong. This includes all about what they did at CERN with their famous Large Hadron Collider (LHC), their fanciful quarks,etc.. their discovery of the God particle Higgs boson - all fake. You cannot discover what cannot exists.
3) Our nuclear physics all wrong: see my thread at :
https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/our-nuclear-physics-all-wrong.256578/
Why the atom bomb goes BOOM... has nothing to do with Einstein's E=mc². It is just the plain old "electrical" energy, not some fanciful "strong" nuclear force that the relativists like to invent. Nuclear physics need to be all rewritten according to what I have discovered. You should know why they talk and talk about having free and cheap nuclear fusion energy from water...and could never deliver the goods! How can you make any headway working based on a failed nuclear energy physics. My brag greater than that of Mano Subnani: "If they are serious wanting to succeed in fusion energy, they have to believe in what I tell them!"
Most people who say Einstein's a genius is just repeating from "hearsay". My 12 year old grand nephew told me Einstein's brain was preserved and they found the neuron's different from others. I countered: "Why is that I tell you "kow gong" is more clever than Einstein and you don't believe?".
You should understand why Xi Jinping ban google, facebook, etc from China. You can control the world as long as you can control and direct their thinking. The media for the past 100 years have "told" people how great and grand was Einstein's physics. So relativity and Einstein became a very classy brand name like lamborghini...How many of you who say Einstein's is right really understand special relativity physics? Fair enough, you don't. You just trust your doctor without studying medicine. It is call trust.
We choose whose words to trust and whose words not to trust. Trusting that "Einstein's a genius" is harmless as you don't "live by believing in Einstein alone, but more so by bread...". But if you trust your live on a false teacher - say - there may be very bad consequences. If I have a close friend who knows physics and if he reads my paper, he may agree with me that my discovery is all good and valid - nothing strange.
Chan Rasjid.
"Einstein's Physics All Wrong"
http://www.emc2fails.com
Similar threads
