Because I don't follow a false prophet. People who follow false prophets go to hell. So that's why you are going to hell.
You follow a false God, that's why you are a pork eater slit eyed chink who is going to hell. You are in no position to determine if I am going to hell.
The mongol main force raped and destroyed your arab masters at their capital baghad. The battle of ayn jalut was fought by the main force of the mamlukes versus a remanant army of Hulagu, who had already left the area with his main force. If you need to boast about such unequal odds as a victory, your ego must be so in desperate need for self validation.
Genghis Khan smashed islam all the way despite being grossly outnumbered and much poorer.
If Genghis Khan had ''smashed'' Islam - which is a religion, how on Earth could anybody smash a religion? - then there would have been no Islam left so many centuries later.
Clearly, your source of information is inaccurate. Much like most kuffars'.
Your European Masters were fucked in the anus and pussies by Mongol armies and Moscow, Eastern Europe were ransacked by the same Mongols. Your chink ancestors were
ruled by the Mongol Yuan dynasty.
Yet, much of the Middle East, Egypt, Saudi, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Libya, Tunisia, Sudan, Algeria were not even
touched by the Mongols. Indon, Malaysia, Brunei, Bangla, Maldives also remained untouched by the Mongols. Altogether.
Wrong.
Europe, from the start, even during the Roman era, was prosperous in fertile land, wood and trade. That's why nomadic tribes like the Huns, Visigoth, Alains, all headed west towards europe. The moslems invaded europe repeatedly throughout the history of islam partly because europe had great fertile lands for settling and plundering.
Moslems did push deep into Europe, into the center of France, until they were decisively beaten at Tours by Charles Martel. You clearly don't know your history and is dumb. Or you were educated at a madrassah, which basically means you are still uneducated.
You mean Europe was a natural resource rich region reliant on primitive activities like agriculture?
We don't disagree then.
Europe was primitive throughout the last 7,000 years of human history and contributed nothing. Even the Greeks had ripped off the Egyptian state of the art in tech and science, architecture and philosophy to form their ''civilization', which gave rise to such perversions as pederasty and
Oedipus complex.
Sth that chinks are not too unfamiliar with, either.
http://www.china.org.cn/top10/2011-09/02/content_23343011_10.htm
Liu Ziye, Emperor of Ancient China
Another sick royal. he is known especially for his crazy and immoral sexual acts.
Liu adored incest so much that he summoned his aunt Liu Yingmei into his chamber to satisfy his sexual desires, also kept overt incestuous relationship with his sister Liu Chuyu in the palace. Utimately, Liu ordered the consorts and princesses to have group sex publicly with his attendants in the palace and even forced the concubines to have sexual intercourse with animals. Those that dared to disobey were killed on site.
That explains why slit eyed chinks are most famously known as prostitutes, harlots, charlatans, bumchummers, faggots, and LGBT.
Wrong.
Ottomans invaded numerous European countries at the same time, most of them because they were Christian and because they were militarily weaker. The Ottomans, with the blessings of their imams, initiated war to take land from non-moslems.
Italians taught their kids that the moslem turks were murderers, rapists, pirates and bandits. And they were not wrong.
You were trying to tell us that Turks were the sick men of Europe, but due to slit eyed pork eating character of yours , ended up writing the Turks were the sick pigs of Europe.
How come you contradict yourself now? How come now you say that Turks were not sick pigs rather stronger than Europeans and that Italians were afraid of Turks?
Just like your false god, false religion, false persona, false name and false pride, your false narrative has fallen apart.
Moslems were not known to be forward and advanced. The ottoman empire was known more for its military jihad invasions of europe, its harems, forced conversion of christian kids into Janissaries (think of ISIS and its use of kids in terrorism), enslaving non-moslems in Balkan territories (think of ISIS and its treatment of the Yazidis). The abbassids and umayyids were not more advanced than the Tang or Sung dynasties. The mughals were only remembered for the white elephant tourist attraction Taj Mahal and their immense cruelty towards their Hindu subjects.
Inventions like the printing press, electric light bulb, railway, all did not come from moslems or islam.
That is your ignorance.
Muslims were
the leading light of the world, and all the most advanced centres of learning and research were concentrated in the Muslim world.
Chinks were inward looking societies, busy fornicating with their sisters and daughters while sipping alcohol and guzzling pork brothed soup or pork testicles.
Europe was in the
dark ages.
This is an actual, popular term, the dark ages, used in Western parlance today, acknowledging that Europe had been backward for centuries at a stretch. The good thing is it acknowledges the truth, but only partially, because acknowledging the truth in their entirety would reveal how much of European scientific and technological advancements were mere copy-cats of Muslim inventions.
A lot like how chinks and other slit eyed chopsticks today copy-cat Western ideas and tech.
Little wonder you are a moron. You actually believe in the message of the swine moron preach, zakir nair. Zakir nair is officially a money launderer, hate preacher and a charlatan, a fraud. The only people more stupid than zakir nair are those who believe in his sermons.
That is a lie.
The stable and prosperous places are universally are places without or minimal islamic influence. Look at Europe in the past, East Asia, North America. The poor places tend to be very islamic. Think of aceh, kelantan, terrenganu, marawi, fallujah, kashmir, south thailand.
Gulf Arab countries, Brunei, Malaysia, Turkey are Muslim majority societies, Decently prosperous and pretty stable.
North Korea has minimal number of Muslims. Utter sh*thole, backward, unstable.
Think of North Eastern thailand. Near Chiang Mai. Cambodia. Laos. Vietnam. Burma. Timor Leste. India. Nepal. Bhutan. Papua New Guinea. Venezuela. Argentina. And the whole lot. Utter sh*tholes.
Infested with a huge number of infidels, atheists, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus. Look at your beloved Zionists. A failed state leeching on Americans and Europeans. That still receive billions of dollars in American aid, officially. And tens of billions more in unofficial aid, a year.
And that is when the Yanks create instability. Without Yankee interference, and now that Yanks have tried turning their attention on the commie chinks, with spillover on other chink statelets like Taiwan, Hong Kong, Stinkypore, Korea and Japan, these countries will suffer worse.
Europe today is on the decline, and that's after they imported too many moslems who are mostly economically unproductive, working in low value work like selling kebabs, involved in all sorts of illicit vice activities or stirring shariah and terrorism shit from their turkish and gulf sponsored mosques.
Europe has never been richer and more advanced than it is today.
Islam created instability in the Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Animist worlds so that many of these places that were once prosperous were no longer prosperous. I don't see you having a problem with moslems invading non-moslem countries for plunder, rape, and forced conversions.
The wider Middle East, ASEAN, South Asia, Central Asia, large chunks of Sub saharan Africa, and North Africa, alongside the Balkans and Caucasus should belong to the Muslims.
It's
always the infidels who create trouble, instigate violence, murder and instability. If you look at it, anywhere infidels are present, there is trouble. Whether it be North Korea, where there are negligible number of Muslims, or the Yankee- Chink trade war, or the Viet-Chink border war, or the Chink-Ah Neh war in 1962, or American or French invasion of Vietnam, or Yanks fighting off commie chinks and gooks, it's
always some infidel or the other fighting a war.
Name a single war in the world today that does not involve a single infidel military, or their assistance in the form of ISR, logistics, diplomatic support? There is none.
The problem lies with infidels.
Cos i dont see any cheena telling the other two off. Only once i remember AhMeng telling us to cool down. Even syedputra also join in the fun to takan the Malays. As u can see i am the only Malay here. No problem if those cheena continue criticising the Malay/Islam. But when they at the receiving end, be sure to accept criticism too.
They must have feel very insecure with their belief. Tats why never ending attacking Islam and the followers.
