- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
Dear Dr Balakrishnan and Mr Lui Tuck Yew,
I seek you kind assistance to help resolve what seems to be a contradiction. Dr Balakrishnan, you said lowering rentals won’t lead to lower hawker food prices because hawkers are people making a living who will charge what the market will bear [1]. Mr Lui, you said placing taxi COE under the small car category is a concession to keep taxi rentals low [2].
If we apply Dr Balakrishnan’s logic on Mr Lui’s case, taxi companies are also run by people making a living who would also charge what the market will bear regardless of COE concession. That will go against Mr Lui’s claim that a COE concession helps keep taxi rentals low.
If we apply Mr Lui’s logic on Dr Balakrishnan’s case, lowering rents is a concession to hawkers that will keep hawker food prices low. That will go against Dr Balakrishnan’s claim that lowering rents won’t lower hawker food prices.
Or are you saying that hawkers and taxi company CEOs are essentially different breeds of people? Hawkers are passionless capitalists who would charge what the market would bear rather than pass on concessions to customers while taxi company CEOs are compassionate socialists who would not charge what the market would bear but would pass on concessions to customers?
Thank you
Ng Kok Lim
- https://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/help-resolve-contradiction/
I seek you kind assistance to help resolve what seems to be a contradiction. Dr Balakrishnan, you said lowering rentals won’t lead to lower hawker food prices because hawkers are people making a living who will charge what the market will bear [1]. Mr Lui, you said placing taxi COE under the small car category is a concession to keep taxi rentals low [2].
If we apply Dr Balakrishnan’s logic on Mr Lui’s case, taxi companies are also run by people making a living who would also charge what the market will bear regardless of COE concession. That will go against Mr Lui’s claim that a COE concession helps keep taxi rentals low.
If we apply Mr Lui’s logic on Dr Balakrishnan’s case, lowering rents is a concession to hawkers that will keep hawker food prices low. That will go against Dr Balakrishnan’s claim that lowering rents won’t lower hawker food prices.
Or are you saying that hawkers and taxi company CEOs are essentially different breeds of people? Hawkers are passionless capitalists who would charge what the market would bear rather than pass on concessions to customers while taxi company CEOs are compassionate socialists who would not charge what the market would bear but would pass on concessions to customers?
Thank you
Ng Kok Lim
- https://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/help-resolve-contradiction/