IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.
The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LTA's questions on feedback for COE systems show which way they want to go. Wayang!

Thread starter Confuseous
Start date Jun 8, 2013

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)

Asset

Jun 8, 2013

The LTA is conducting a survey on the COE framework, from the perspective of social equitability. Some of the 22 questions the authority has asked include:

• Do you think the current COE categorisation based on car engine capacity should be changed?

• What do you think should be the characteristics of a mass-market car?

• Do you think there should be a surcharge on multiple car ownership? If so, should it be at the individual or at the household (residential address) level?

• If we were to implement a surcharge on multiple car ownership, how do you think it should be levied?

- http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/ltas-questions-coe-framework-public

You must log in or register to reply here.